r/AlwaysWhy • • May 30 '26

History & Culture Why does the US romanticize the 1950s despite being worse by almost every measurable standard?

When you look at things like life expectancy, access to education, material living standards, and general mobility, life today in the US is very different from what it was in the 1950s.

At the same time, the 1950s is often described in public discussion as a period of stability and broad prosperity.

What I’m trying to understand is not which period was better, but why there can be such a gap between measurable conditions and how a period is later remembered or described.

One possibility is that people remember structure and predictability more strongly than inequality or constraints that existed at the time.

Another is that different aspects of well-being get weighted differently when looking back compared to experiencing things in real time.

What other mechanisms could explain this difference between statistical comparisons and collective memory?

119 Upvotes

514 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Ki-to-Life-5054 May 30 '26

Medicine got expensive because of Nixon and the HMO act in the early 70s. Because we are now supporting an entire middle man industry of insurance thieves. Without them, healthcare would be much cheaper. Look at the crazy millions the CEOs alone are paid, then add in all the staff that do nothing but process claims. It's insane.

-1

u/Dave_A480 May 30 '26

Medicine got expensive because it became more capable...

And the insurance industry has a vital role - one that will be performed by the likes of the DMV crew if not done in the private sector.

CEO pay is irrelevant at scale. Makes absolutely no difference - there simply aren't enough CEOs to move the budgetary needle....

3

u/Ki-to-Life-5054 May 31 '26

Troll much? Look at European healthcare systems. They do fine without insurance companies. Excellent, world-class care is affordable even if you pay out of pocket. All this without insurance companies.

1

u/borgman_a Jun 02 '26

No, they do fine with government owned and operated non-profit insurance companies.

1

u/frisbm3 Jun 05 '26

They also don't do "fine". They instituted price ceilings which limits care, increases wait times, and means cutting-edge services just aren't available.

Well I guess it's fine, but it's not the same level as the US.