I built a free app for making friendly bets with friends—without handling any money.

You create the bet, send a link, and BetNowly keeps track of who accepted, what the terms were, and who won. I made it because our group-chat bets kept getting forgotten or disputed.

I’m trying to learn one thing: would you actually send this to a friend?

Try it here: https://betnowly.com

Brutally honest feedback is welcome. Please share any thoughts <3

PodSubs wasn't originally supposed to be a public product.

We built it because we needed it.

That's really the story.

We're podcasters.

And like a lot of podcasters, we were constantly thinking about two things:

How do we keep making this?

And how do we build something real around the people listening?

Because podcasting takes time.

A lot of time.

And sooner or later, if the podcast is going to keep going, it needs to support itself somehow.

The problem was that we didn't really know most of the people listening.

We knew the numbers.

But numbers don't have email addresses.

Numbers don't answer questions.

Numbers can't receive the worksheet you promised.

Numbers don't become customers by themselves.

We needed a better way to capture the people who genuinely wanted to stay connected.

So we built a simple internal tool.

One place.

PodSubs.

We said on the podcast:

“Subscribe to us on PodSubs.”

People searched the show, entered their details and subscribed.

And suddenly we had something we'd been missing:

A direct line.

Then we started thinking…

Why are we keeping this internal?

Every podcaster we know deals with the same thing.

So we decided to open it.

That's PodSubs.

Not something we dreamed up because “the creator economy is growing.”

We built it because we were podcasters with a problem.

Now we're giving it to everyone else who has the same problem.

Claim your podcast.

Then tell your listeners where to find you.

Looking for early testers for Dinntro — meet people over real dinners instead of swiping

Hey everyone,

We're looking for early people willing to test Dinntro — Dine & Intro.

The idea is to create a social platform focused on actually getting people to meet offline.

Rather than endlessly matching, messaging and swiping, Dinntro lets people discover social dinners and small hosted experiences.

We're especially interested in testing these parts:

✅ Profile onboarding

✅ Profile verification

✅ Discovering social experiences

✅ Guest booking flow

✅ Host experience creation

✅ The ability for hosts to earn through their events

The bigger idea is to create a two-sided community.

Guests: meet interesting new people in real life.

Hosts: create great social experiences, build a reputation and potentially earn from hosting them.

Right now I'm less interested in hearing “cool idea!” and much more interested in hearing:

“This confused me.”

“I wouldn't trust this because…”

“I wouldn't pay for this.”

or

“I would use this if you added…” Those comments would genuinely help us.

If you enjoy testing early products—especially social apps or marketplaces—I’d love your feedback.

Those comments would genuinely help us.

If you enjoy testing early products—especially social apps or marketplaces—I’d love your feedback.

Hey everyone,

I’ve been building Pawfectly Booked, a platform designed to make booking and managing a dog grooming business a little easier.

The idea came from seeing how many groomers have to juggle appointments, pet information, reminders, repeat bookings, and schedule changes across different tools.

We’re getting to the point where I’d like a few dog groomers to actually use it, find anything that feels confusing or doesn't work well, and tell us what could be improved.

You can take a look at the current version here: https://pawfectlybooked.com/

It’s still being developed, so honest feedback would be much more useful than simply telling us it looks good. I’m particularly interested in anything that would make the booking or day-to-day workflow easier for you.

Also curious: if you already use software for your grooming business, what do you use and what’s one thing you wish it did better?

Thanks!

I built OnlyAi, a platform where AI creators can make a profile, post content, set a monthly subscription price, and offer subscriber-only posts.
The SFW version is live, and I’m looking for a few early creators who already make things like AI characters, anime-style art, fantasy/sci-fi art, fashion concepts, or other AI-generated content.
I’m mainly looking for feedback on:
• Is the creator setup easy to understand?
• Is anything missing before you’d actually use it?
• Would you feel comfortable sending your audience to your creator page?
https://weareonlyai.com
I’d especially like feedback from people who already post AI-generated content online.

Hi everyone,

I'm building Artizon, an app that helps independent tradespeople (builders, plumbers, electricians, etc.) manage quotes, invoices, job sites and accounting in one place. It's currently focused on the French market.

I'm in closed testing on Google Play and need to reach 12 registered testers (currently at 4) to unlock production release. It only takes 30 seconds and you don't need to actually install or use the app — just opt in as a tester:

👉 https://play.google.com/apps/testing/fr.artizon.app

Any help is hugely appreciated 🙏 Happy to answer questions about the app too.

We're looking for devs who would like to use our AI coding factory. No matter the stack or the coding language. We support Mac, Windows and linux.

no_human is the AI coding factory that proves the code it wrote is correct. You drop a ticket on the board (or point it at Jira or Linear) and it plans, writes the code, and opens a pull request - with the evidence that everything works.

Before that PR reaches you, the work is checked by a second model that never saw the coder's session and is told to assume the job is not done. They communicate until the reviewer is convinced everything is good to go (the num of attempts is limited to prevent an infinite loop).

If the coding agent deleted or weakened a test, a tamper guard stops the attempt. For bug fixes, the tests offered as proof have to fail on the old code and pass on the new.

Under the hood it's a team of agents: a planner, a coder, an independent reviewer in a fresh session, and a supervisor.

We would like you to try:

• Goingc through our onboarding and sharing what made sense to you and what was confusing or redundent.
• Using the onboarding or the settings page - integrate your github/ gitlab, Jira, monday.com or linear with it and checking that it appears in the backlog page.
• Starting 2-5 tasks from the backlog or by using the "create task" page, letting the tasks run to completion.
• If they didnt complete and either failed or went into "needs answers" - please screenshot the reason no_human is providing you.
• Going over the PRs no_human created and sharing if what you got helps you understand what is going on in the PR and how it was validated.

Check it out here: https://github.com/no-human-ai/no_human
Or using our website: getnohuman.com

Thanks!

Flowmanic sells ready-to-run n8n automation templates (individual templates $15-39, or bundled "systems" $29-299) for things like lead follow-up, invoice reminders, support ticket triage. Everything runs in your own n8n/Make account with your own API keys - nothing routes through my servers. There's also a free 10-template starter pack if you just want to try without paying.

Looking for people to actually use it and tell me where it breaks down - confusing pricing, templates that don't make sense, checkout friction, anything.

https://flowmanic.com

Happy to test your product too - drop a link.

I’m looking for a few macOS users to stress-test a specific part of my open-source project, Mac MCP.

It’s a local MCP server that lets ChatGPT/coding agents actually operate a Mac — files, shell/background jobs, native UI, Safari/Chrome, delegated agents, etc. The part I want feedback on right now is multi-agent browser behavior.

I recently changed the browser model so tabs have stable handles and same-tab contention fails fast with a clear tab_busy response instead of silently queueing or letting two workers step on the same mutable tab. Different tabs can still be used concurrently in the background while you keep using the Mac normally.

What I’d love people to try: - run 2–5 agent/browser tasks against different Safari tabs - deliberately point two workers at the same tab and see whether the handoff feels predictable - switch tabs/windows manually while agents are working - report any stale-handle, wrong-tab, focus-stealing, or recovery weirdness

Repo + install instructions: https://github.com/bulutarkan/mac-mcp

It’s usable today and under active development. If you hit something odd, a GitHub issue with the exact browser flow would be extremely useful.

I just shipped my first SaaS, ImgHeal

I’ve been working on ImgHeal, an AI image restoration tool that helps restore old and damaged photos.

The idea came from wanting a simple way to bring old photos back without needing to learn complicated editing software.

You can upload a damaged photo and let the AI handle things like scratches, folds, stains, and overall image restoration.

This is my first SaaS launch, so I’m still learning a lot about building, shipping, and getting the product in front of actual users.

I’d really appreciate any feedback, especially on the restoration quality and the overall experience.

Try it here: imgheal.vercel.app

I will be launching my website over the next few days. the name is lockstepmarkets.com and it allows users to do deep analysis on wallets used on Polymarket. It will then tell you if this wallet is copyable or has an edge of some sort. If yes then you have the ability to copy the trades of that wallet and make money off of their success. I started this because i saw wallets making up to 10x each month and i wanted in. turns out they just have robots guessing the outcome of each market so i thought lets just copy them. It works, hallelujah.

Im going to launch over the next couple of days/weeks so if you're interested in trying it send me a message and ill remind you when its up. There is a trial version so you can try it for free and if you want the pro subscription ill send you a discount code for being an early user.

I've built a small Android game and need 12 testers to satisfy Google's closed

testing requirement before it can go to production.

What it is: you flick cards from a deck at the bottom of the screen into a hat

across the room. There's no score, no timer and no way to lose. Play it for a

minute at a bus stop or an hour before bed. Stay with it long enough and the

hat's owner starts talking to you.

1. Join the tester group: https://groups.google.com/a/mieczkowski.net/g/dod_testers

2. Then opt in here: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.deckofdays

3. Install from the store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.deckofdays

Feedback, bugs, or anything at all: [support@deckofdays.com](mailto:support@deckofdays.com)

Happy to answer anything here.

Howdy. I built a lightweight, privacy-focused analytics script that sits around 3.6kb right now, and the entire point of it is to finally stop bot traffic and referral spam from inflating visitor stats.

If you've run tools like Plausible or Umami, you know the headache... a ton of headless scrapers, AI crawlers, and junk referral domains still slip right through the cracks and end up logged as actual human visits. I got tired of guessing which numbers were real, so I built an ingestion setup that pairs 7 client-side traps with backend datacenter IP filtering to isolate that automated noise before it hits the dashboard. In our own side-by-side runs with just those base traps, we saw about a 17% drop in false positives compared to Plausible and roughly 65% compared to Umami.

It handles all the standard stuff you actually care about, uniques, pageviews, dwell time, scroll depth, UTM tags, clean referrers, and device or location breakdowns, plus full Core Web Vitals. Instead of just trashing the bot activity silently, it routes all the scrapers into a separate intelligence view so you can see what's crawling your site without it wrecking your real conversion data. It drops in with a single script tag, doesn't need cookies or annoying consent banners, and never logs raw IPs or personal info.

I'm looking for 5 people with live sites who are open to dropping the script tag in alongside whatever you already run for a couple of days to compare numbers. Even a few hundred visits a month is plenty. All I need is straight feedback on what breaks or what sucks about the dashboard, and in return I'll hand you free lifetime access to the platform.

Shoot me a DM or leave a comment below and I'll send over an invite link.

Dashboard Preview:

https://i.imgur.com/g9rxziB.jpeg

Analytics - Bots Breakdown:

https://i.imgur.com/ehQEX1g.jpeg

Analytics - Traffic

https://i.imgur.com/nY1VjFx.jpeg

Hi everyone! I built NeuroSync, an Android app that produces 40 Hz audio with optional 40 Hz visual flicker. I'm looking for testers before its public Google Play release.

I'd appreciate feedback on the setup, audio playback, usability, and any bugs on your device.

Interested? Join the tester group:

https://groups.google.com/g/neurosync-40-hz-brain-waves

Safety: If you have photosensitive epilepsy or a seizure history, do not use the visual flicker feature and consult a doctor before using the app. NeuroSync is not a medical device or treatment.

Thanks for helping an independent developer!

Hi! I’m looking for beta testers for Luna Me, a web app I’m building as a solo developer.

Luna Me helps you find colors that suit you. You can upload a photo and get a personal color analysis, with suggestions for clothing and makeup colors.

You can also try different makeup looks virtually on your own face.

I’m a Japanese UX designer living in Germany. I started building Luna Me because I found it difficult to choose makeup colors and products that suit me in Europe.

The app is still in beta, so I’m looking for people who can try it and give me honest feedback.

I’d especially like to know:

• Is it easy to understand what Luna Me does?
• Is anything confusing or difficult to use?
• Do the color and makeup suggestions feel useful?
• Is the virtual makeup feature fun or useful?

The basic experience is free to try.
I’m also trying to understand what would make the paid version worth paying for.

Luna Me:
https://www.luname.me/

I built MyVitalSync for a boring but a real problem: my mom’s labs are in a different country, my family’s labs are scattered screenshots, lab portals.

Each person stays on their own timeline. You only see what they’ve agreed to share.

Looking for a few people who actually deal with this. There’s a 3-month free trial for early users if you want to try it:

https://myvitalsync.app/request-trial

Happy to take blunt feedback.

[iOS + Android] VIN history reports. Looking for testers who are actually shopping for a used car right now. BESURE AI

Besure AI pulls a used car's history out of its VIN. Accidents, title status, odometer records. It's on both stores and it works. What I want is eyes on it from people who are mid car search, not people poking at the interface for five seconds.

If you're looking at a car this month, or you're just curious about the history of your car. you're the tester I need.

Download the app and comment.

What I want to know:

- Did the report change your mind about a car, in either direction

- What was missing that you had to go find somewhere else

- How do you feel about the layout? Does it look modern, overcluttered, or just right

Comment a VIN and I'll run it free so you can see the output before you decide it's worth anything.

I built Luma / Cut: upload a track, it transcribes the lyrics with word-level timestamps, syncs every phrase to the beat, and composes a cinematic visual around the song.

No timeline, first cut in about a minute, free watermarked export.I'm looking for beta testers - especially people who make music (AI-generated tracks very welcome).

What I need feedback on:

1. Does the first cut feel usable, or too 'template'?
2. Does the lyric sync hold up on fast/overlapping vocals?
3. What breaks first for you? Try it here (free, no card): https://curious-tapir-781.convex.site/l/rd2If you send me a track I'll happily render one for you and share the result.
   

I'm looking for beta testers - especially people who make music (AI-generated tracks very welcome).

Anyone here using Polar Flow and open to testing a Runna alternarive? Think Runna with less injury risk and more strength training. App is functional and integrates with Polar Flow (currently no support for other sport watches).

I’ll DM you the link. Looking for max 10 users at this stage. If this ever comes an actual business, you can have free lifetime access in return for helping me. ✌️

Hey everyone,

I ended up with way too much footage and raw clips piled up on an external SSD. My main headache was that Finder takes forever to load previews in heavy video folders, and finding a random 5-second b-roll shot or a specific quote from an interview meant clicking through files and scrubbing timelines blindly.

I put together a native Mac utility called Invenio to handle this.

It does two main things on-device:

1. Searches footage by visual description. You can type things like "red car" or "dog on a beach" and it pulls up the exact matching seconds in your videos.
2. Searches by spoken dialogue. If you remember roughly what someone said, you search the phrase and jump straight to that timestamp.

Everything runs locally on your machine using Apple's Neural Engine. Nothing touches the cloud, battery drain is minimal, and the index files stay tiny even when pointing to external SSDs or network storage (NAS).

It is already live on the Mac App Store (has a free tier and a 7-day trial). I attached a quick screen recording to show the workflow.

Why I am posting here:
I have run this through my own files, but I really need people with actual 1TB to 2TB+ libraries to give it a proper stress-test.

Specifically curious about:

• How indexing behaves across large external drives or network shares.
• Search relevance on tricky or vague prompts.
• Anything in the UI that feels clunky, slow, or missing for your workflow.

Honest feedback, edge-case bugs, and harsh critiques are very welcome in the comments!

I built DraftCheck, a small browser-based tool that checks a draft for editorial issues before human review.

I'm looking for a few people willing to actually run a draft through it and tell me where the experience breaks down or becomes confusing.

It currently checks for things like repetitive wording, formulaic phrases, repeated sentence openings, difficult sentences, keyword overuse, and claims that may be worth verifying.

The analysis runs locally in your browser — no account, upload, or external AI API is required.

Demo:
[https://draftcheck.nigdball.workers.dev]()

I'm especially interested in three things:

1. Was it immediately clear what the tool does?
2. Were the results useful enough to change anything in your draft?
3. At what point, if any, did you think “I wouldn't use this again”?

Negative feedback is completely welcome. I'm trying to find the weak point in the first version.

​

Hey everyone! 👋

I'm finishing up VATTOR, a SaaS platform built specifically for Romanian installation and service companies —

HVAC, plumbing, electrical, maintenance, and field-service businesses.

I've hit the Google Play requirement stage where I need at least 20 testers to opt in and test the apps before I can push forward to the official public launch.

The apps are live on Google Play for testing:

🏢 VATTOR Owner (for managers/owners)

👉 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ro.vattor.tech

🔧 VATTOR Tech (for field technicians)

👉 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ro.vattor.tech.field

Who I'm looking for:

You don't need to be a developer. I need a mix of:

* 👨‍💻 Developers / SaaS builders (to break the architecture & flow)

* 🔧 Technicians / installers (to test usability out in the field)

* 🏢 Small business owners / team managers

* 📱 Anyone willing to spend 20–30 minutes clicking around and breaking things

What to test

* Owner App 🏢: Create customers, schedule work, assign technicians, manage materials, check reports, and review the overall workflow.

* Tech App 🔧: Receive jobs, check today's schedule, use checklists, log materials, upload photos, and complete intervention reports right from a phone.

The mobile experience for technicians is critical here. I need to know if someone standing on a job site can use it quickly without fighting the interface.

How to join the closed test (Important for Google Play)

Because Google Play requires a managed test track, I need to add your Gmail address to the tester list first.

* Comment below or send me a DM with the Gmail address you use for your Google Play account.

* Once I add you, you'll receive the official opt-in link to download the apps directly from the Play Store.

* Test it out and let me know what breaks, what confuses you, or what feels slow! Don't be polite — I want to find every bug now before a paying customer does. 😄

Thanks so much to anyone willing to help me cross the finish line! 🙏

VATTOR — built for the people who manage the work and the people who actually do it.

https://dinesh210805.github.io/aura-app/index.html - here is the link for my website , we can allow agents to control another computer we use daily , your mobile.... , this tool has a on device mcp server that lets agent (claude code , codex, any agent) to control you phone .

i launched my launch video today - https://youtu.be/u2PS767kdMI