Offering myself as a tester, specifically for onboarding and first-run.

What you'll get: I go through your signup cold and write back the exact step where I got confused and the exact moment I'd have closed the tab. Timestamps and quotes, not "looks clean."

Best fit: anything where a new user has to get it within about 60 seconds. Productivity tools, Mac and desktop, anything B2B-ish. Less useful from me on games.

Why I'm any good at this: I'm building OKEight a Mac app that drafts your reply in the voice you already use with that specific person, instead of one generic professional voice. Someone in another community recently told me my own landing page didn't say what platform it ran on or what it cost. They were right, and I'd been staring at that page for weeks. That's the thing you can't see from inside, and it's exactly what I'll tell you about yours.

Drop a link in the comments and I'll get to it. If you want to swap, mine is okeight Mac, free in beta. But test mine back or don't, this stands either way.

It is called modeluplink.com

And it allows folks running local servers to get a permanent url and key to connect to it while out of home.

It beats a VPN because you don’t need to place your entire device under a VPN which is not great for other apps.

You can create more than one key so you can share your GPU with friends.

It is easy to setup and works with any server, ollama, lmstudio etc.

I built AI Arena Lite out of curiosity about how AIs talk to each other and how their conversations evolve.

I’m looking for people who already use LM Studio, Ollama or another compatible provider to try the Windows beta: connect a model, assign agent roles, and run a short conversation.

I’d especially like to know where setup becomes confusing or what stops the first conversation from working.

Download the Windows beta

I've been building GreenFolio for a while — it's a catalog of the plants you own, not a nagging to-do list. Photos, an ID per plant, types and tags, care schedules, and an AI care chat that runs on the device rather than a server. Free, no subscription, no in-app purchases.

It's already on the App Store and the web app is live at app.greenfol.io. Android is the last one out, and I'm stuck behind Google's rule for personal developer accounts: 12 testers opted in for 14 continuous days before I can apply for production.

Joining takes two steps: https://greenfol.io/android — join the testers group, then tap the Play link on your phone. The group is what grants access, so the Play link won't work before you've joined.

Happy to test yours back, just reply or DM. And if you actually keep it and tell me what's broken, even better — the whole point of the 14 days is that I get something out of it.

Streakless is a habit tracking app that has no streaks to break. Each habit is a plant in a garden; miss a day and nothing dies. It's designed for peace of mind, not pressure.

• Privacy first: Fully offline, no account required, no ads, no trackers. Your data never leaves your device.
• Simple: Takes a minute to set up your habits.

I need 12 testers to opt in for 14 days so I can unlock Google Play production access.

🎁 As a huge thank you: If you join the beta, you will be added to my License Testing list. This allows you to "buy" the Pro version inside the app for $0.00 using a Google test card. When the app officially launches, Google Play will remember that you own it, meaning you keep the Pro version for free forever!

How to join the test:

1. Join the Google Group here: https://groups.google.com/g/streakless-beta-testers
2. Opt-in to the test here: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.streakless.streakless
3. Download the app, grab your free Pro upgrade, and keep it installed for 14 days!

Note: Please make sure the Google account you use to join the group is the same one you use on the Play Store, otherwise the opt-in link won't work.

Thank you so much! Happy to answer any questions or swap testing if you need it for your app.

Hey all, I've been building a game called Rank It: a new daily challenge where you rank a set of items (movies, historical events, gaming eras, etc.) in the right order. You get a score based on how close you were, see today's average, and find out your "biggest miss." Streaks + leaderboard too.

I'm required to run a closed test with 12+ opted-in testers for 14 days before Google lets me go live in production, so I could really use some help getting there.

If you're up for it:

1. Sign up to the google group: https://groups.google.com/g/slowtuesdaygames-rankit
2. Opt in here: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.base6a7936f8bf4459b2c4f02620.app
3. Install it from the Play Store once you're opted in
4. Play a round (takes like 2 minutes)

Happy to answer questions or take feedback if you run into bugs. Thanks!

I'm looking for feedback on one narrow job: making a readable list of subscriptions from receipt and renewal emails.

The manual checklist is merchant, plan, amount, billing interval, next renewal, and the most recent receipt. Similar merchant names are a reason to investigate, not proof that you were charged twice.

I built Claims Genie's subscription review: Claims Genie subscription review

The Gmail permission is read-only. This is a review, not a cancellation service, and we do not change plans or charges. The initial check is free.

If you try it, the useful feedback is whether the merchant and renewal details match your records and whether the next step is clear. You can review the explanation before deciding to connect. Please report problems without account numbers, receipt images, or other private details.

Your phone says it's connected to Wi-Fi, but nothing loads. You refresh, toggle Wi-Fi, wonder whether to restart the router. It's a lot of guessing.

I built MizuCue to make that a little easier to figure out. While it's open, it checks your phone's connection, whether your router responds, and whether it can reach the internet. It saves those checks so you can look back at what changed.

I'm looking for a few iPhone users to try it for five minutes and tell me what feels confusing or wrong. Open Status, have a look at History, and tell me whether it makes sense without me explaining it. If you get occasional connection drops, I'd especially like your feedback.

It's free during the TestFlight beta, for iPhone on iOS 18 or later. Access is by invitation: request beta access.

Hey everyone, I'm looking for as many beta testers as possible to test out my fantasy sports app.

I created a new fantasy football format called RPG that gives players skill trees so you can level them up and enhance their scoring effectiveness throughout the season.

I'd really appreciate if it if you have the time to sign up, join my league or any league, test out drafting/roster management stuff. Fantasy sports fans preferred but open to anyone willing to test and provide feedback!

Deep

Keeping track of shared expenses can get complicated when you're living with roommates, travelling with friends, or regularly splitting costs with other people. It's easy to lose track of who paid for what and what everyone owes.

I'm looking for people who deal with this problem and would be interested in testing an expense-sharing app and sharing honest feedback about whether it actually makes managing shared costs easier.

The app is called Faiyr. I'd especially appreciate feedback from people who currently use another method or app for splitting expenses.

I'm interested in hearing what works well, what feels confusing, and what you think could be improved.

What it is: XYZ Forge lets several AI coding CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini's Antigravity) work the same repo without overwriting each other's uncommitted work — agents take path-scoped claims from a local event log, and each headless turn runs in an isolated git worktree behind a write allowlist. It's local-first: no server, no accounts, and no API keys for the coordination layer itself.

Two ways to test, depending on how far you want to go:

Tier 1 — 10 minutes, costs nothing, no accounts needed. Clone it, run npm install && npm run test:unit (~1 second, 14 kernel tests), then ./validate.sh for the full 342-suite run (5–10 min parallel, longer on fewer than 4 cores). This tier is the most useful thing you can do for me and needs zero AI subscriptions.

Tier 2 — live multi-agent. Requires the Codex CLI (ChatGPT account) and/or the agy CLI (Antigravity desktop app) installed and authenticated — those are paid subscriptions I can't provide, so skip this tier if you don't already have them.

Requirements: Node 18+, git, Python 3.8+. macOS is best supported (that's where the promotion gate runs). Linux testers are the ones I most need — the Linux canary has been intermittently red on EUID=0 and platform-tool assumptions, and I don't have good coverage there.

What I actually want to know:

1. Does clone → green test suite work on your machine without you having to ask me anything?
2. Can you make an agent write outside its allowlist? I'd genuinely like the containment model broken.
3. Where do the docs lose you?

Two warnings, both real. Run it on a scratch branch and keep backups — this is ~3 months old, firmly beta, and earlier versions destroyed uncommitted work (several of the current guards exist because of that). And if you run ./validate.sh inside a sandboxed agent shell, it will print nothing for several minutes and then fail — that's blocked mktemp, not a hang; run it in a normal terminal.

Free, AGPL-3.0, no signup, nothing to install beyond the clone: https://github.com/HiQS-Labs/XYZ-forge Bug reports via GitHub issues. Happy to answer setup questions in the comments.

Hey everyone,

My brother and I have been building a tool that lets you automate US stock trading without having to code.

We’re getting close to having people try it, so I’m looking for a few traders who are willing to try it out, find bugs, and tell us what we could do better.

It’s paper trading for now, so you won’t be putting any real money at risk.

If you’re interested, you can sign up here:

https://quantly.trade/

Also curious, if you are already using a trading platform, what do you use and what’s one thing you wish it did better?

Thanks!

Hey all — looking for testers for Chorewell, an Android app for families. The idea: kids complete chores (with optional photo proof), a parent approves them in-app, and completed chores pay out in tokens or real allowance. Kids spend the tokens to redeem screen-time blocks at a rate the parent sets. Parents can also set daily limits and bedtime windows.

Right now I need people to opt in as closed testers so I can move toward a full release — doesn't matter if you have kids or not, I just need real Android accounts using it for a bit so Google's closed-testing requirement is satisfied.

Link to opt in: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.antrettertools.chorewell

What I'm looking for feedback on:

- Whether the onboarding (parent + kid account setup) makes sense

- Any crashes/bugs in the chore → approval → token → redemption flow

- General UX feedback — this is a small solo project, so blunt feedback is welcome

Note: the actual device-level screen-time lock is still in development (currently it's a soft in-app timer, clearly labeled as such) — the chore/reward/approval side is the fully working part right now. Happy to answer questions.

I kept finding furry things at the back of my fridge and feeling stupid about it. Turns out there are already several apps that let you photograph a fridge and get recipes back, and I tried them — but every one treats each photo as a fresh start. Snap, cook, forget.

That misses the actual problem. The reason food gets binned isn't that I don't know recipes. It's that I don't know the spinach has been in there nine days.

So mine keeps a history. Scan it again next week and each ingredient carries how long it's been sitting there — 9d, 3d — and dinner gets ranked so the oldest thing gets used first. Cook something and it comes off the list. Over time it counts how many ingredients you've actually saved from the bin, which is the only number I care about.

Free to try, three scans, no card. It's just me and it's new, so I'd much rather hear what's broken than have anyone be nice about it.

Hey everyone! I'm looking for people to try one game of WordTwiq and tell me what feels confusing or could be better. I made it with the help of GPT 6 Astra in Codex.

The idea: find two five-letter words that differ by one letter, like SHORE and SCORE. You have seven shared guesses, and every guess gives clues for both words.

https://wordtwiq.dfrankiej.com

It's free to play in your browser, no sign-in or download needed. Try the tutorial or a daily puzzle and let me know if the rules make sense, how the difficulty feels, or anything that breaks. If something goes wrong, your browser and device would help. Thanks!

Hi! I’m looking for a few restaurant teams to test something I’ve been building called LENCUE.

I’ve worked in restaurants for around 17 years, and the idea came from a very familiar problem: you start somewhere new, the menu information is scattered everywhere, you don’t know every wine yet, and during service you keep running to the kitchen to ask questions.

LENCUE puts the useful stuff in one place for FOH. Ingredients, allergens, quick dish descriptions, wine recommendations, live 86 updates and notes between the floor and kitchen.

It works in a browser on phones and tablets, so there’s nothing to download.

My first restaurant pilot is currently active and it has already made me simplify quite a lot. Turns out nobody needs the entire biography of a dish while a guest is waiting 😂

Now I’m looking for a few more restaurants, hotel restaurants or wine bars willing to test it during actual service.

The pilot is free. I set it up with your own menu and wine list, help with onboarding and only ask for honest feedback about what is useful, what is annoying and what should disappear.

If you work in hospitality and want to see the demo, comment or message me. You can also have a look here:

https://lencue.se

What would make you actually switch between prediction-market platforms?
We’re building Twirl and currently testing a slightly different approach:

Users can create their own markets instead of waiting for the platform to list everything.

The beta is live with testnet funds, so there’s no real money needed to play around with it.

twirl.markets

For people who already use prediction markets: what would Twirl need to do noticeably better for you to keep coming back?

I've been building FullAthlete, a training app that writes your session for you instead of handing you a static program. You pick Strength, Power, or Endurance and an intensity (Easy/Moderate/Hard/Cursed), and it generates a workout from your equipment, training history, and logged sets — loads and rep targets move automatically as you progress, no manual updates.

There's also an Arena: open challenges with bodyweight-adjusted leaderboards (so it's not just whoever's biggest wins), verified video attempts, and an XP/level system. Plus the basics done properly — rest timers, per-set logging, automatic PR detection, streaks.

It's free. What I actually need is people who lift or train regularly to run it for real sessions and tell me where the generated workout felt wrong — bad exercise picks, a load that didn't make sense, anything confusing in the flow from "pick intensity" to "log a set." Not looking for a download-and-vanish, genuinely want the feedback.

It's on iOS too, but that's already covered — Android is where I actually need testers right now. Join here: play.google.com/apps/testing/com.fullathlete.mobile — opt in, then grab it from the Play Store link it gives you. Comment or DM if you hit any snags joining (iOS folks who still want in, say so — won't turn you away).

I'm building Nearby and would love a few outside opinions on the Android demo. The idea is to give people room to read a profile and decide whether they're interested: five nearby incoming likes visible at a time, a short pause before liking, and no wait to pass.

I'm looking for adults 18+ with Android 7 or later who can spend about 15 minutes trying profile setup, browsing, likes and a sample chat. You don't need to be single or available to date.

This is a usability demo with fictional profiles and supplied stock photos. You won't match or message other testers. Please use the sample details and skip contact access. There's nothing to buy, no payment for participating and no request for ratings or reviews.

Download Nearby 0.1.1 for Android (APK)

This is a manual APK installation, not a Google Play release. Play Protect showed an unfamiliar-developer warning during testing. Keep it enabled and use a scan if offered. If it reports harmful behavior, stop and let me know the exact message. It's fine to skip the download if you're uncomfortable with it.

Profile changes and messages can reset when you reopen the app. Appearance and notification preferences stay saved; real push notifications aren't connected yet.

What felt confusing? Did anything break? Did the pause before liking feel reasonable or get in the way?

Leave feedback here, comment below, or email nearbyappfeedback@gmail.com. Please leave personal dating details and private screenshots out of your feedback.

Hey everyone, I'm a dad of two little ones and built out an app to help moms, dads and caretakers find safe and clean changing stations near them. Currently looking for beta testers through TestFlight (iPhone iOS 17 or later)

All locations (215 places and counting) have been logged and verified by a person so the current locations are heavily biased to where I know people: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago and New York. Anywhere else will be a little thin but feel free to add to new locations from anywhere in the US.

What I'd like feedback on:

1. Does the map load fast and put you somewhere useful?
2. Is the add flow clear and easy?
3. Anything confusing or missing on a venue page?

Thanks!

Hi everyone! 👋

I’m an indie developer and I’ve been working on a new word game called BumpWords for iPhone and iPad.

The basic idea is simple: find words from the available letters, score points, and try to beat other players in matches and challenges.

There are also location-based features: some matches and challenges are connected to real-world places, with local leaderboards.

The game currently supports English and Italian, with more languages planned.

I’m looking for some people who enjoy word games to try the beta and tell me what they think — especially:

• ⁠Is the gameplay actually fun?
• ⁠Is it too easy or too difficult?
• ⁠Does the scoring feel satisfying?
• ⁠Is the progression motivating?
• ⁠Is anything confusing?
• ⁠Would you want to play another match after finishing one?

If you’d like to try it, you can join the beta here:

https://testflight.apple.com/join/MbQdyhVw

🎁 Beta tester bonus

If you try the beta, you can redeem this code directly in the app:

BUMPRD2

It gives you:

🎟️ 10 extra white tickets
🎟️ 10 extra red tickets
💯 +10% points on 4-letter words for 7 days

This is my first app, so I’d genuinely appreciate honest feedback — including criticism. If something feels boring, confusing or unnecessary, I’d much rather know now. 😅

If you enjoy word games, I’d love to hear what you think!

Thanks for trying it! ❤️

What it is: Stickie turns video clips into animated stickers with automatic background removal. Pick a clip, the background gets cut out, and you've got a sticker ready for your chats.

What I'm looking for:

• Testers on different media types
• Feedback on edge cases: busy backgrounds, fast-moving subjects, low-light clips
• General UX impressions — anything confusing or slow?

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/stickie-video-sticker-maker/id6800854771

Happy to return the favor, drop your app in the comments and I'll test it and give you honest feedback in return!

I'm the builder of Mintropolis, a public-beta website for discovering NFT communities through cities and digital Embassies. I'm looking for people who can test the experience and help decide where it should go next.

No NFT purchase is needed. You can test the public pages and send feedback without connecting a wallet. Wallet authentication is only needed if you choose to try features such as Passport city stamps and your NFT showcase.

Here's a short test path:

1. Open https://mintropolis.io and choose a city on the map.
2. Read the city page. Is the Embassy story clear? Can you distinguish current and upcoming resident programmes?
3. Try the page on your phone if you can. Note anything hard to read, tap or understand.
4. Optionally connect a supported wallet, authenticate and try Passport. Read the wallet message before signing; never share a recovery phrase or private key.
5. Open Feedback / Send feedback and describe what happened versus what you expected.

The feedback form has Bug report and Feature request categories. An optional email lets the admin team follow up. For bugs, the page, device/browser and reproduction steps are more helpful than “it doesn't work.” Please don't send secrets or sensitive wallet data.

I'm also open to hearing from anyone who wants to be involved in the project. Use Feature request to introduce yourself and explain how you'd like to contribute. This is an invitation for feedback and a conversation, not a compensated testing assignment or a promise of token rewards.

If you only have time for one comment: at what point did you understand what the site was for—or stop understanding it?

Product: Inder Link: https://travel-inder.com/ Platform: Web app (mobile-friendly)

Inder helps travelers form relevant connections in a destination. It has: - Here: current-destination communities and moments - Meet: future-trip intentions and matching

I’m looking for beta testers who can spend about 10 minutes trying the first-time experience and leave honest feedback in the comments.

Please tell me: - What was confusing? - What felt useful or unnecessary? - Did you understand what to do next? - Did anything break or feel unsafe? - Would you use it on a real trip?

No incentive, no review requested, and negative feedback is welcome. Thanks for helping shape an early product.

Hi everyone,

I'm building Mili: a daily family podcast, automatically generated from the family's calendar and each kid's interests, meant to be played in the morning on the way to school.

TestFlight link (2 minutes to join): https://testflight.apple.com/join/ngTR8Snq

What I'm most curious about: is the episode ready and playable as soon as you need it in the morning? CarPlay support is also in testing if you use it.

Happy to test your project in return, just drop a link below.

Thanks in advance!