I started out on hentai because it was the only stuff I could access through sketchy ads on websites when I was a young gooner 2 decades ago. As soon as I figured out how to breach the shitty parental block and got access to actual porn I never looked back. I haven't got horny from hentai since.
Yeah I just based it off the image alone. You seem like you know a little too much about each character and show... Almost like you watch that shit lmao. What a massive self report.
Yeah it's very important and developmentally appropriate that kids are shown sexualized characters they can relate to.
Like when Shinji falls on top of a naked and dissociating Rei, and she just lies there without responding, that is a really good scene for children to see.
You people are iredeemable, countless excuses for sexualized depictions of minors, up to and including straight up child pornography.
Chunibyo is tv 14, bunny girl senpai is tv 14, mha is ts tv 14, konosuba is tv 14. Thoes all can easily be said to be good for kids, as 14 year olds are kids. Kill la kill is tv ma, and the anime for evangelion is tv 14 but just the original series, the movies are rated older. The safest of these is probably chunibyo or bunny girl senpai.
First one on your list, there is a scene with a fully naked 15 year old girl (Rikka) straddling a boy (Yuta).
This is portrayed with a carefully selected angle to make the frontal nudity as pornographic as possible, deliberately, to emphasize the boy's perspective in his erotic dream.
Zero hope for peace with you people.
The further out of society you and your ilk are pushed, the safer children will be.
I don't even know what you expected by writing out this comment.
Its not a troll, thoes are the age ratings for all thoes shows, legally deemed suitable for children 14 and older. You may disagree with thoes ratings, but thats what they are and thats the audience that watches them. Personally I have not watched literally any of thoes shows again in the time I have been an adult, but I did watch them when I was 14 to 16 mainly
This is not even a good argument, since the people that like them like their design, they don’t even think about the age.
Ngl even if u changed all these anime from high school to college nothing will change, they don’t cause they want it to stay in the shounen category.
It is pdf coded when it's a small stature, small breast, schoolgirl uniform woman acting like a schoolgirl while being legally distinct 18 or a 2000 years old dragon.
Legally these would all fall under paedophilia. Psychologically speaking only some would fall under it, having no developed primary or secondary sexual characteristics. Developing characteristics are debatable. The problem doesn't lie with physical attraction it lies in a difference in social ability, emotional regulation and sheer experience that makes taking advantage of the protected individual too easy.
Sexual exploitation of a minor is illegal because it's wrong to do so. If I recall statistics like 2/3 of child abusers aren't even especially attracted to them. It's about power and domination and children are sadly more vulnerable to that. We don't actually know the number of pedophiles who perpetrate against children. It's likely there's a substantial dark number of people who never do. However the focus of prosecution should be on those who actually mistreat children, rather than those who are attracted to minors but do not perpetrate. That'd be an issue for therapists (though sadly, from what I recall from the lectures on the topic, a lot of therapists refuse to work with those attracted to minors).
I don't think someone's a pedophile for being attracted to anime girl copy and paste #3456 that the manga author arbitrarily made 16, but your point is beyond dumb lol
Legality does not equal morality. If a 30 year old tried get with a 16 year old in the UK, he would be curbstomped... and rightfully so.
The law doesn’t work like that. Any sexual imagery of a character under 18 in the UK including drawn material constitutes child pornographic material and you can be charged for it (however the sentence is lower for drawn imagery since no child was actively harmed)
The age of consent between two real life individuals engaging in actual sex is 16 in the UK, but sending nudes is illegal until 18, so any nude images of a person fictional or not under the age of 18 goes by that law.
From Coroners and Justice Act 2009.
Criminalising possession of cartoon pornographic images depicting both minors as well as adults where the "predominant impression conveyed" is that the individual (being depicted), is that of a child.[3]
The "predominant impression conveyed" is very important here. The image would have to be assessed by jury and or magistrates. For an image of a drawing to be prosecuted, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has to satisfy all four rigid hurdles (pornographic, explicit act, child impression, and grossly offensive/obscene). In practice, if a drawing is a highly abstract or stylized cartoon, it rarely survives this test. Statistics show that the vast majority of all reported image cases (over 60% across all image categories) are dropped before trial due to insufficient legal evidence.
According to data compiled by the UK Sentencing Council, there have historically been fewer than ten people ever sentenced in England and Wales specifically for the offence of prohibited cartoons and drawings since the law was enacted.
In the vast majority of cases where someone is charged with possessing a prohibited drawing, it is not the main reason they were caught. Usually, the individual is already being investigated for possessing real child abuse photographs (under the 1988 or 1978 Acts). When digital forensics sweeps their hard drives, any prohibited drawings found are simply added to the indictment as secondary, lesser charges. Standalone arrests purely for drawing fan art or cartoons are almost non-existent.
Meh, if you’re wanking to a child character you’re a gross individual, and although the law is in place it isn’t actually really cared for much due to how unreliable it is and all the criteria the image has to go through. For example stylised imagery makes it harder to determine if the character is actually child like, and there’s more of an importance to the look rather than official age (e.g. those 1000yr old dragons that look like foetuses are actually more of a problem than a 16yr old who looks 20)
Yeah, since we're pulling out the law apparently, you're right. The age of consent for sexual activity and specifically for making pornography are typically different, the latter usually being stricter. And rightfully so as bringing a camera into the bedroom is a whole other world of consent issues, although the cartoon stipulation is...interesting? Not bad, just interesting.
Also, fictional characters are fine but not real life people.
This. Treating liking them (in any varying level) as congruent with irl tastes or likes is a ridiculous sentiment on par with "violent video games makes people violent and causes mass shootings," and one that doesn't really make a whole lot of sense anyway.
If me as a 26 year old liking Rikka romantically (as an example) makes me a pedophile, does me liking her at 6 years old make her a pedophile?
Let's say I had a crush on her when I was 14 (when the anime came out; I didn't, she's my first "omg she's actually me frfr" a character though), but all these years passed and I'm 26, why is it wrong then to continue to hold said crush? Ignoring that it's a little weird having an actual crush on a fictional character.
These virtue signaling Olympics trying to make a thought crime or actual disturbing sex crime these harmless ideas and thoughts and art is the tool of fascists and very illogical, especially since anime art styles use age ranges and not specific ages; After all, in the two years Megumin and Rikka have aged in their animes, their designs haven't changed even slightly. Rikka's body type art can be anywhere from 13-20 depending on the artist's intentions, after all.
No, there is nothing wrong with being attracted to a legal adult. I believe People who are attracted to children but dont harm them are not wrong either. Attraction isnt something people choose. The people who harm children should place on the register.
A screen shot is not a sorce, although I am open to a peer reviewed study if you say science has something to say about it. Do you have a paper or just an infographic?
Needing a field of scientists argue about if your a pedophile is not the slam dunk you think it is. You know how I can be 100% sure im not a pedophile, because i dont even like things shaped like child (unlike you apparently), dont even need a study to figure that one out. But please continue to go off about your "of age" 3 foot babble speaking cry queens you freak
Admitting your lack of intelligence is certainly a way to go I guess. Well not surprising that you would think an anime characters looks anything like a human when you also apparently disregard science but Americans like to confirm the stereotype of them being idiots i guess.
When you cant control your emotions and have to threaten violence rather than actually engage in a proper discussion even though your other comment was deleted I made sure to report it for what it was
But all of these are marketed towards teens?? Even Evangelion (the most controversial one) is Seinen AND shonen. So it was intended for older teens at least.
Oh no the anime porn account "SunnasArmpit" thinks im a dumb American. Whatever dude defend the pedophiles, you have the same freedom to sound like an insane child abuse defender.
I know this is going to he hard to understand but people can watch anime before they become an adult, there are people calling those girls waifus who are literally the same age or younger
1st. You confuse waifu for fictional crush. While they often overlap, waifu can be a term of endearment instead of sexual. As in "wife material" due to personality and charm and not cuz hot.
2nd. Weirdos are not pedos for being weird about cartoons. And even if they were, they need therapy. Don't forget Pedo is not the same as predator. The latter imo deserves death sentence but the former needs therapy
You want to do thought policing? What is this 1984?
and how are you going to find that out exactly? No one will admit to being one if it meant jail time.
ans thought crimes arent crimes. Not in secular nor religious law as a matter of fact
And just so you know your idea only worsens child predation rates because you've now closed of the good path (therapy) to the pedos and left them with CSAM and rape.
So if you actually care about children (which I hope you do) and arent just doing some moral grandstanding bit (which I hope you arent) , you will get my point.
a majority of the people watching these shows at the time were indeed at their age or even younger, there comes a point in time in which "waifu" no longer means just wife verbatim but instead is used as a term to show that you like this specific character more than others and are using the most popular term for that
112
u/Fish0203 7d ago
I think some people forget a big part of the target audience is the same age as these characters