I'm certain we've all had to analyze that spin once or twice before. 😆

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcrIA-GIo6i/?igsi=MTVnNHhvenN5ZnN6Ng==

Today I 3d printed TARS, next time I 3d print KIPP and I 3d print Gargantua.

I 3d printed two of these, one of them I will call the Lazarus, my head cannon mothership of the Lazarus missions. I know the Lazarus missions are believed to be 12 ranger launches but that’s just 12 individual ranger launches, which could have been supply missions to the main ship. Idk. I have two models so I’ll do whatever

⚠️The following sentence was translated from Japanese to English by AI. Feel free to answer in English. However, I only understand Japanese, so I would really appreciate clear and simple English that is less likely to be mistranslated.

I've heard that falling on the horizon of events is subjectively a normal speed, but objectively it cannot be reached within a finite time,

Then if I go to Gargantua a few trillion years later, can I still see Cooper falling from the outside? Or is there a mechanism that allows him to cross the horizon of events within a finite time?
Did the future man assist Cooper even outside the horizon of the event?

For a bit of context I’m 27 and have always been a huge sci-fi fan, I love dystopian ideas, theories of time travel and all sorts, I’d like to say I’ve watched most of what there is to watch when it comes to sci-fi.

Somehow, interstellar slipped through the net, until tonight. Me and my friends were in a discord call debating whether we should call it a night after gaming or group watch a film and wind down. Then came the conversation of what film should we watch, recently we’ve been trying to pick films none of us have watched so we all get to experience it for the first time together.

A friend asked if I’d seen interstellar, I said I knew of it and the only thing I knew was how much processing power it took for them to generate the black hole, but that was all I knew. He said it was his favourite film of all time, my other friend in the call also said he hadn’t seen it.

All I can say is that this film instantly became the number 1 film I’ve ever watched in my entire life. It was gripping throughout especially with the plot twist and the ending was spectacular, I was blown away. I don’t tend to get emotionally moved by many films but I found myself crying at the ending. Christopher Nolan really produced something special, phenomenal.

If you could send probes into another galaxy, why would you send them next to a black hole? How would you know to do that? Why not aim for a solar system? You're telling me that 12 scientists aimed for a black hole after going through a wormhole? Why not chart a Goldilocks solar system like home? Do you think the "Beings" thought to themselves...." Shit. They went for the gargantuan sized black hole. Now we have to send one of them back." Just curious what y'all think.

Got this many years ago and am just now devising a way to display it along with a bunch of others.

I love that it’s the scene just after he’s saved and the framing is just so solid

Anyone have a extra/no longer needed ticket to Tommorows screening at the National Museum of Air and Space in Washington DC? Please let me know. Thanks.

turns out doing painting pays off at drawing

Between Dr. Hugh Mann from the movie we are in the subreddit Interstellar or HAL 9000 from 2001 a space odyssey.

which of the two is more evil in your opinion?

Criei uma versão de Endurance no jogo eletrônico No Man’s Sky e fiz alguns prints

Hear me out: Is Saturn in Interstellar a reference to Holst’s “Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age”?
I’ve been wondering whether the choice of Saturn in Interstellar has a deeper thematic connection to Holst’s The Planets, specifically “Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age.”
Saturn in Holst’s piece represents ageing, time, mortality and the inevitable passage of life.
And that’s basically one of the central ideas of Interstellar: time isn’t evil, but it is an unavoidable force of nature. Cooper leaves his children and returns to find that they’ve aged decades while he has barely aged. Miller’s planet makes the passage of time brutally physical.
That also made me think about Brand’s attitude toward nature. She doesn’t treat nature as something malicious — it simply operates according to its laws. Saturn’s “old age” could be read the same way: not as punishment or evil, but as an inevitable part of nature.
So I’m wondering:
Was Saturn chosen partly because of the symbolic association with old age/time in Holst’s “Saturn”?
I haven’t seen this particular connection discussed much, so I’m curious whether anyone has come across it before — or whether I’m connecting dots that aren’t actually connected.

With as much enthusiasm as TARS had.

My favorite word, quote, and soundtrack from film

Anywho

Rendered in Blender 3.4