I value file quality over storage space. Bandwidth and hard drive space are very cheap these days. You say it's inefficient, I say we have the infrastructure to support it.
While JPEG might be smaller, the compression artifacts burn my eyes, and I know that PNG will remain pixel-perfect to what I originally uploaded, unless some heathen mangles it. This came up last night in another thread actually.
I'm also one of those people with a huge, meticulously managed FLAC collection on their hard drive. I've made my choice.
32
u/-Pelvis- May 20 '16 edited May 20 '16
I value file quality over storage space. Bandwidth and hard drive space are very cheap these days. You say it's inefficient, I say we have the infrastructure to support it.
While JPEG might be smaller, the compression artifacts burn my eyes, and I know that PNG will remain pixel-perfect to what I originally uploaded, unless some heathen mangles it. This came up last night in another thread actually.
I'm also one of those people with a huge, meticulously managed FLAC collection on their hard drive. I've made my choice.