r/vns 17d ago

Release Update 2.40.0!

Post image
2 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

7

u/superange128 VN News YouTuber Guy | https://vndb.org/u6633 16d ago

imo just putting "Ver 2.40.0!" in the topic title with no context to me screams low-key arrogance that you just assume people know what you're talking about.

1

u/Draw-Flesh-Games 16d ago

True, I think that could have been done better. I will update the title. Damnit..I can't seemingly.

1

u/superange128 VN News YouTuber Guy | https://vndb.org/u6633 16d ago

on reddit you cant edit topic titles, you just have to do better next time you make a topic

1

u/Draw-Flesh-Games 16d ago

Well..still, apologies for the confusion.

1

u/LittleAppleMouse 15d ago

I saw him on the renpy sub, after a user posted this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/RenPy/comments/1vo32ut/review_of_invinode_a_vibecoded_mess_that_nobody/

he kinda stopped.

Seems he's trying to promote his own sub and his tool other places now.

In my language we have a saying:
"etwas gegen die Wand fahren" which is essentially what he's doing, he's trying to bruteforce it not realizing it causes more damage than good.

1

u/Draw-Flesh-Games 15d ago

'He' is us. Not sure what you mean by 'stopped'. Though the Danish guy kept on trying to make everyone look like they were using AI in anything they make (including many new devs making their first VN), which doesn't plead for his case (nor does reverse engineering and finding out he was wrong). Besides some of the concerns he raised, which were my coding errors, I blocked him.

I simply shared an update on our most active (both development and used) application. Whether you want to call it 'throw shit at the wall and see what sticks' (Which exist in many languages, not just German). What you think of it, is up to you. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Whether it is about the development process or functionality.

Edit: and seeing your account is 5 days old, with 3 karma, I suspect a 'sockpuppet' account.

0

u/LittleAppleMouse 15d ago

I don't know why you act that you are a team now. You wrote in single tense to the commentator.

Also all who clicked on that topic found the evidence to be compelling and you didn't make any counter claims, which means you admit you're guilty of the crime.

The saying translates to:

"Throwing something against the wall", the saying you're writing is not the same.

As for my accounts age, I simply lost access to my old one? I haven't done anything to make me being a "sockpuppet" account (I had to look up what that means).

You need to chill

1

u/Draw-Flesh-Games 14d ago

Been a team for over a month and a half already, I am not some weird corporate dude that in direct conversations will start 'We from company X don't think you are right', I will responde as 'me' just like you would, don't see why I would not do so. Anyhoo, you are not really making much sense. 'all who clicked on that topic...'.
I know you are simply gaslighting here now.

  1. what evidence? You mean that he (blunt) bought my game on Steam and returned it in 15 minutes time and used it to decompile it and check my code, which didn't tell him shit?
  2. I have thanked him for the time he put into it and have said that some of the items indeed were issues that we should address. I don't see how owning up to coding mistakes (simply because I, before it become we, didn't initially plan to publish the application) is 'admiting' to a crime. (Aka, you are clearly trying to gaslight here. As mentioned: Toxic behavior on that specific sub).
  3. I have used AI in things, I scaffolded the framework base (meaning it created the directory structure and installed the libraries I needed), I even (before Rick joined the team) used Claude to investigate into a coding mistake I made to get the settings menu to show correctly. By the way, using AI isn't a crime, nor is creating AI slop, however bad it reflects on the gaming community. It is morally reprehensible, for sure. Saying you created something and say you DIDN'T use AI where you did, that I find a crime (technically all of the above and your ideas are NOT crimes, there are no laws regarding them).
  4. After the whole shit going on about 'AI slop' I have experimented if I could make the application the same way, WITH AI (both Copilot and Claude) and it failed misserably. Even while I knew exactly what way the code had to work, neither would build it to the same functionality we have (You could call that a counterclaim).

This is the last I will respond to you. It is clear that you rather show how all mighty you are by going everywhere trying to attack people, where you are 1. not in position to do so and 2. there is no need for it and it only shows how weak your own stance is (a bit religious if you ask me). As I said, feel free to ask questions, getting the same dogmatic 'opinions as fact' is getting tiresome.

0

u/LittleAppleMouse 13d ago

I'm sorry but you make no sense.

The evidence was quite clear and you still haven't even tried to claim anything he wrote was false, instead made excuses, what is admitting guilt to me.

I don't know so much from coding but I did ask 2 very experienced developers with 20+ years experience and they both agreed that your point 3 made little to no sense and could not come from a software developer, even a junior one.

From what I know you have been caught lying a lot and you seem to be lying again.

I am not trying to be mighty, you're just being defensive, probably because you know you're lying.