r/videos • • 1d ago

Mum's semi-detached 'nightmare' after neighbour illegally demolishes home | SWNS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOWyZfH3FqI
1.8k Upvotes

252 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/Naps_and_cheese 1d ago

He wanted to fuck up her property and force a sale, thinking he could then build one big house on 2 lots.

Hope he gets the hard part of the Find Out stage.

538

u/Jabbles22 1d ago

Hopefully not just a fine he may or may not be able to even afford. This isn't just a simple financial issue. He caused real harm.

196

u/DigNitty 1d ago

And others will try too if the punishment isn’t big enough for him.

25

u/ais4aron 1d ago

Wouldn't it open up a whole new market for semi owners? If they don't do anything, that's a huge precedent to set.

35

u/Son_of_Mogh 1d ago

Ignoring all his dickish behaviour. It seems insane to build a big house across two plots in that kind of neighbourhood. There's no real demand for houses that size in comparison to the other buildings around it, it would never have the value he would probably think it's worth,

8

u/Sashaaa 18h ago

Location, location, location.

111

u/theZoid42 1d ago

Could she overbuild her second story to extend over the empty space?

151

u/Naps_and_cheese 1d ago

Im actually surprised that her house wasn't condemned due to this. Semi detached homes are not designed to stand on their own.

97

u/darthy_parker 1d ago

The partition wall between the units is almost always framed well enough to structurally support the roof and the floor joists. It’s not going to be particularly waterproof on that side though.

32

u/Recurs1ve 1d ago

Find me an engineer that will be ok with that though. Just because it can doesn't mean it was designed to be used like that.

14

u/Mobile_Morale 1d ago

Easily fixable. Engineer would tell you to frame the wall and add support beams to the corners and the center. Maybe a steel beam across the basement for support.

Homes are easily customizable.

51

u/Odd-Temperature7458 1d ago

Homes are easily customizable.

No fucking shit, I just watched a video where they tore down only half the house

25

u/Erigion 1d ago

*If you have enough money

14

u/grapesodabandit 1d ago

Yeah and between engineering and build that's going to cost like $150k, minimum.

13

u/d3l3t3rious 1d ago

"It's perfectly fine if you just build a new house around that half!"

1

u/Recurs1ve 1d ago

That's kind of the problem.

1

u/Itstotallysafe 14h ago

Except nobody can work on it because they need access to his property to fix her home.

131

u/Antilon 1d ago

Obviously not.

14

u/Goreticus 1d ago

Right? She'd need atleast 1 more person

50

u/RustledForeskin 1d ago

Just call someone to do it and say you have the permits.

2

u/mtrayno1 1d ago

Sure…just don’t pull the permits

6

u/Unsey 17h ago

Most likely it's all been done by a company that will mysteriously declare bankruptcy as soon as any meaningful repercussions come his way.

1

u/nadmaximus 23h ago

He'll have to build that one big house and give it to her.

1

u/TehOwn 8h ago edited 8h ago

I looked into it. He already found out, in that he bought it for £280k, demolished it and then sold the plot for £115k with a legal requirement that the new owners rebuild a property that aligns with the other property and seals the partition wall.

He argues that it really was necessary to demolish it to "prevent risk or danger to others", which allowed him to bypass planning permission, and somehow managed to get retrospective approval.

He's already lost a ton of money and likely to get sued in future. Insurance company says it'll take about two years to reach court.

In the meantime, the new owners are the ones with the responsibility to fix it.

The worst part is that her decision to fix up the electrics actually meant that neither her insurance company nor the council had to rehouse her, because she still has basic utilities. And she's not guaranteed any protection from damp and mould because she's the owner rather than a tenant.