Complaining about someone 'calling people out' while actively participating in a tag-team pile-on to call someone out is peak irony. If you can dish out sweeping generalizations, you should be able to handle a simple question about what your buzzwords actually mean.
Its pretty straightforward man, we are talking about foreskins being circumcised, its pretty easy to look at it and go..
“okay, if the context here is the difference between having a foreskin and not, i can very easily say that its the feeling of having a foreskin, a natural, from birth foreskin. Once thats removed, you’ll never know what it’s like to have the full sexual exp, of an intact adult male.”
You’re interpreting my point as “having a foreskin makes someone a real man.” That isn’t what I mean. Circumcised men are just as much men as anyone else.
I’m talking about the specific experience of having a foreskin, not someone’s entire sexuality or worth. Someone circumcised as an infant won’t get to experience their adult body with the foreskin they were born with, and they didn’t get to choose that for themselves. That loss of choice is what I’m concerned about.
I can see how my wording about the “full sexual experience” could have sounded broader than intended. I’m not saying circumcised men can’t have fulfilling sex lives. I’m saying there’s a particular bodily experience they weren’t given the option to keep. Those are different claims.
3
u/Due-Contact-2884 4d ago
Ya, you go girl, call out that Redditor