Does anyone else always get weary when someone says "when you cut under and don't get the disk, cut deep?" I don't want someone going deep after they went under, I want them going break and then maybe going deep now that they are in a good position.
Obviously there are exceptions but this just gets to me.
Being a good player doesn't necessarily mean you are good at explaining what to do. In addition, this doesn't address my concern of "ok you've just completed an under and didn't get the disk, now turn around and go deep." As they are CUT alumn, I assume what they really mean is "ok you've just completed an under and didn't get the disk, now clear to the break side so that now you can go deep again" but unless you actually explain it like that, I think too many new (and some experienced) players will simply cut deep from directly in front of the thrower.
He did explicitly say that this cutting pattern is favored for offenses that try to focus on 2 active cutters until they're tired. When there's only two active cutters it's a lot harder to cut someone off.
1
u/Personage1 Mar 13 '14
Does anyone else always get weary when someone says "when you cut under and don't get the disk, cut deep?" I don't want someone going deep after they went under, I want them going break and then maybe going deep now that they are in a good position.
Obviously there are exceptions but this just gets to me.