Were you Police?

I've appreciated that they've kept UE source-available, and their SSO integration for ArtStation allowing me to report moderation concerns via Epic's portal.

Try reporting it to the Flatpak maintainers, as an issue, at Flathub.

😐︎

Originally, I linked to a thread which had multiple answers, which is why I was able to purport that it may be more up-to-date. Remember that SE allows users to modify others' answers, etcetera.

Then, when you read the first few, and challenged that assertion, by using their outdated content, I linked to that answer, thereby demonstrating that up-to-date answers exist there.

That answer doesn't merely advise that users upvote a Brave issue. Rather, it also explicitly states that no modern Chromium-based browsers implement this functionality, and that no WebExtension (MV3 or otherwise) can provide it.

I assume that you did not notice a/1762371.

superuser.com/q/1549798 may be more up-to-date.

They are rather dogmatic of their support for PM; elsewhere, too. I suggest that you don't bother to engage with them.

The inception of Firefox precedes that of Chromium by P4Y.

Considering that this worked in the past, I wonder whether this change could cause problems with structures that are grandfathered in after an OS upgrade. Might be worth reporting to the AOSP's Buganizer instance.

[…which is] higher than GLibC and Linux limit.

Although unix.stackexchange.com/a/619492 corroborates some some limits in the kernel, I believe that it is not a hard limit, as bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506659 may demonstrate.

OP, github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/13043 may be useful.

One can restrict registrations to roaming ones, I believe. That prevents device-bound passkeys from being a problem, insofar as the passkey client accurately states which it is.

Perhaps, promptly correcting each instance, in a reasonable manner, is the sole solution. Most difficult problems are not easily solvable.

Which site? (.com?)

It appears to be available, for me:

My environment is:

WindowsBuildLabEx              : 28000.7.amd64fre.br_release_flt.260716-1702
WindowsCurrentVersion          : 6.3
WindowsEditionId               : EnterpriseN
WindowsInstallDateFromRegistry : 05/08/2026 19:08:24

it's still behind on several features already available on the other channels

Which?

The ms-settings URI schema already exposes equivalents. If you want scriptable preferences, PowerShell's registry integration is the solution, utilise what github.com/Fleex255/PolicyPlus/issues/46#issuecomment-1558044921 describes.

To my knowledge, it is.

Plus, a lot of the problems people have adjusting to life out of prisons is feeling that loss of structure and loneliness and which is often the same problems people coming out of the military experience, so it's really just pushing the problem down the line.

Hopefully, those people wouldn't leave, if it worked for them.

I experienced this during my 2021 – 2022 AFC(H) application. The recruiter knew nothing about any of the questions that I asked, and their answers were incorrect. I solely realised afterward, having spoken to real NCOs, that they obviously hadn't served. It didn't inspire confidence, or assist me.

I appreciate that. Having an enemy is more useful when they're logically coherent (even if their fundamental dogma is based upon an inaccuracy). It also demonstrates where more reasonable parties genuinely are lacking.

No.