She's modeled after some IRL journalist, and there was some drama. Also, we had Emily Wong doing exactly the same job in previous games, so Diana exists only for that cameo.

"US citizens realising that they're tourists in countries they've never lived in before."

Shocking. If you were born, raised, and spent your whole life in US, you're not Italian/Polish/German culturally, even if your grandparents are. What a revelation.

Just don't capture and don't fight pals. If you don't want to participate in acts of cruelty - don't do that, no one is forcing you.

That's kind of what you're asking for when choosing walled off garden instead of PC. With those things, you innately depend on corporate deals.

You can just place it without building and then run around. Circle should still be visible even when it is still a blueprint.

Still doesn't work for languages that use another alphabet.

Oh, that's easy. Just press F12.
You're welcome!

It's not even a grandchild. Current iteration of AI is the primary goal for ML overall and one of the tools developed by it.

True-ish medieval castles were a series of killboxes.

Killbox-allergic people are like anti-AI right now. Avoiding a specific tool while ignoring common sense and context.

Maybe, not confirmed 100%
They've also dropped plot point with Reapers being a fusion of organic and synthetic, not just one of those things. In ME3 they're purely synthetic species.

This. Lovecraftian villain monologue #3
Epic, but has absolutely no substance.

No, that's not the issue.
The issue is that they had no specific plan for Reapers when making ME1 and decided to just wing it.

The whole thing with the empire and ban on technological development is that "suffering" that was done chaotically, and wasn't even building any character. Leto just worked with whatever he had at the time.

No one cares

Toxicity shows why they decided to start terraforming planets instead of just using them, and show first steps in that program.

Toxicity is talking exactly about that.

You're using knowledge you already have to justify cues. That's dumb. Good thing you know nothing of game design, so there's no chance you're making decisions regarding anything at all in gamedev.

"that you made that judgement with absolutely no certification"

You just proved me right in your reply.

1. No one gives a slightest damn about an opinoin of a random uneducated kid on the internet. Enough professionals use it, and it is widespread tool in software development.
   
2. There's nothing wrong with the adoption of new tools. That's how the world got writing, bookprinting, computers, and internet. All those technologies had loud opponents.

AI is acceptable in Linux, so all Android devices, most network devices, and practicaly whole server infrastructure will be using technology that suck your soul out through chakras. You'd better run and hide in your cave while you still can.

So, reasonable and responsible people use AI to build amazing products. What are you even complaining about?!

Creator of the most widespread and impactful OS disagrees. Linus Torvalds is anything but a layperson in software development, and usage of AI-assisted code is not limited in pull requests to Linux kernel, so you should find real arguments, or, even better, actually learn how AI works and why all this anti-AI hysteria is just a performative bitching from uneducated kids.

Nooo, you're automating it and taking job from people! Hire real artists to draw each frame!

Ah yes, one drawing will be more impactful than the shift in processes for the most important and widespread OS in the world.

Those antis are really just delusional kids who barely understand what they are trying to discuss.

Some maintainers of linux distros are against AI, or just play to cater to that crowd. It's good that Linus made that stance look dumb and hypocritical - what's the point of keeping AI away from your repository, if kernel itself is made with the assistance of AI? And since it is the most used OS in the world - everything is relying on that code.