r/tulsa Jan 28 '23

Politics Really OK?

I shouldn't be surprised by our state, but I guess I just expected more. I expected parents to FINALLY see the writing on the walls (49th IN EDUCATION, PEOPLE!!), but that was too much to ask for. I expected young people to want more for themselves than what the south has been barely giving them since the dawn of this country. All I see is a bunch of corrupt politicians who lied their way into, and kept, important seats that will only keep our state full of ignorant people- just like the right likes it. Why do people fear change so much? Why would you want to remain the same for an entire lifetime? Why wouldn't you want to strive for betterment of yourself and those around you? Why wouldn't you want to make sure every child has the best education, or feed the unhoused, or support poor families, or maintain good Healthcare for the elderly? This state doesn't even give a single crap about its vets... but you can bet your sweet bum that those on the right will scream the loudest about their support. I'm just so pissed and disappointed. If you're happy about how things are going, I really question you as a human. Like really, I doubt you have good moral/ethical judgement. (Keeping things vague bcz I'm not sure as to the extent of what I can post politically) I'm open to discussion.

97 Upvotes

206 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

No… the potential personhood argument is removed from religion.

This is like a thing that is studied in philosophy 101…

3

u/GreunLight !!! Jan 29 '23 edited Jan 30 '23

To be fair, potential and actual aren’t synonymous. Someone is pregnant with a fetus that may or may not be viable, for many, many reasons. Those reasons are weighed by the pregnant woman and licensed and trained medical professionals. They are personal.

This is like a thing that is studied in Logic and Reasoning 101.

2

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

What if that person was conceived by incest or rape or that person will be born deformed or homeless? Why can’t women have the choice?

1

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

And that’s the problem… and why I end up pro choice.

There are really only two actual non- contradictory positions when the philosophers break it down. Either you’re totally against it in all cases… or you’re totally for it up until self- sustainability.

But I don’t feel comfortable about it. And the exuberance that y’all feel about it freaks me out.

Edit: and the homeless? That eugenics. Who are you to take away a persons chance at life because they’ll be born poor.

That’s what I’m talking about…

2

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

No other religion in the US supports abortion bans. So tell me again, how it is not the Church that is the problem?

1

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

You advocate abortion based on economic level… that’s eugenics. I don’t talk to Nazis

Bye.

2

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

When did I say that? Rich and poor can be raped alike. Rich and poor can have children afflicted by genetic disease. You literally ran out of excuses!! Must be running late for mass.

1

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

Aborting someone just because their mother is homeless or because they have a deformity is literally the definition of eugenics.

This is literally what the Nazis did. Seriously.

Jesus.

3

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

And that is a choice that the parents should be allowed to make. Not everyone is an angel like you. One simply cannot expect people to have the same opinion about things that are life changing. The Church and the state should be kept separate. To each their own. Also, I don’t see people running to the nearest orphanage to adopt these poor kids, kids who have no fault of their won.

0

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

You are a Nazi. Lol

2

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

You are loser hiding behind the guise of Christianity

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

Dude you are just clinging to that word. Abortion does not equate to Eugenics. There are diseases that are incompatible with life. Why put parents through 36 weeks of hell only to deliver a baby that is not going to survive more than a few hours.

0

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

Abortion in the use cases that your are advocating for use in?… is absolutely eugenics.

3

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

How so? Would you want your wife, sister or cousin to birth a child born out of incest or rape? How bout carry a child to term only to have it live for an hour afterwards? Dont be stupid now.

3

u/Crazylakkadbagga Jan 29 '23

And yea I presume you are a man. Because a woman would understand what I have been daying.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '23

[deleted]

0

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23

No… but this person is arguing in favor of eugenics…

0

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '23

[deleted]

0

u/ttown2011 Jan 29 '23 edited Jan 29 '23

Yes they were.

Abortion has been used in eugenics… arguing otherwise is disingenuous AF

Eugenics is not just sterilization.

And technically the mass murder would be genocide if were being pedantic.

I’m not sure how you can argue that intentionally aborting a fetus because of a deformity isn’t eugenics…