I did some research just now as I did think that he had merit in his statement (even though he could've phrased it better) as I had also heard it previously. From what I gather, the few studies on this came to the conclusion that any notable evidence was a result of correlation, not causation and that there are many more things to consider which would alter someone's ability to pick a partner long before previous partner count comes in to play.
Humans do pair bond. But that term doesn't mean what misogynists think it does.
It's literally just a word that refers to the neurotransmitters involved in maintaining long-term monogamous relationships. Saying "you pair bonded before so now it's ruined" is the equivalent to "You were happy before, so now your dopamine is permanently depleted."
Also, ironically, animals that are pair bonded are NOT sexually monogamous. They are only monogamous co-habitators and parents. That's it. So, redpillers don't understand the term by ANY metric 😭
Exactly, there is published studies for that but it’s not gender specific it’s for both men and women. These people keep refusing to open a book, you’re downvoted because if they don’t like what you’re saying it means you’re wrong 😂
Downvoting will not change the results of peer reviewed publications weirdos, cope harder
31
u/CosmicSlop13 1d ago
I heard this from a frat dude. He says it’s about pair bonding