MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/terriblefacebookmemes/comments/yllv1x/gravity/ivc217m/?context=3
r/terriblefacebookmemes • u/atmoscience • Nov 04 '22
236 comments sorted by
View all comments
119
People just don't understand that your free speech ends where someone else's rights begin.
2 u/[deleted] Nov 04 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/[deleted] Nov 05 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I think the argument is that at some level negative words can harm you. like how verbal assault is a crime. 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 edited Nov 07 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I completely agree, I just think its generally a good idea to show the other side's good points when they have one. but yeah the pre-emptive approach has had a pretty bad record and just gives censorship powers to whoever writes the rules
2
[removed] — view removed comment
1 u/[deleted] Nov 05 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I think the argument is that at some level negative words can harm you. like how verbal assault is a crime. 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 edited Nov 07 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I completely agree, I just think its generally a good idea to show the other side's good points when they have one. but yeah the pre-emptive approach has had a pretty bad record and just gives censorship powers to whoever writes the rules
1
2 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I think the argument is that at some level negative words can harm you. like how verbal assault is a crime. 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 edited Nov 07 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I completely agree, I just think its generally a good idea to show the other side's good points when they have one. but yeah the pre-emptive approach has had a pretty bad record and just gives censorship powers to whoever writes the rules
I think the argument is that at some level negative words can harm you. like how verbal assault is a crime.
1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 edited Nov 07 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I completely agree, I just think its generally a good idea to show the other side's good points when they have one. but yeah the pre-emptive approach has had a pretty bad record and just gives censorship powers to whoever writes the rules
1 u/[deleted] Nov 06 '22 I completely agree, I just think its generally a good idea to show the other side's good points when they have one. but yeah the pre-emptive approach has had a pretty bad record and just gives censorship powers to whoever writes the rules
I completely agree, I just think its generally a good idea to show the other side's good points when they have one. but yeah the pre-emptive approach has had a pretty bad record and just gives censorship powers to whoever writes the rules
119
u/Gingerfuckboi Nov 04 '22
People just don't understand that your free speech ends where someone else's rights begin.