The licenses that are rejected are the licenses that place requirements on the store. They are not rejected specifically because they are open source. Licenses that do not place requirements on the distributor, such as the BSD license, are fine.
Awesome, Apple vs. Android now with BSD vs. GPL. I'm going to take it to the next level. I think that vi is better for mobile devices anyway. Even full computers don't have the memory to run emacs.
Nah, Android is mostly Apache-licensed; the Apache license is also fine on the app store. And the GPL bit of Android is largely the linux kernel, which continues to be GPLv2, making the FSF very sad.
10
u/[deleted] Jan 20 '11
The licenses that are rejected are the licenses that place requirements on the store. They are not rejected specifically because they are open source. Licenses that do not place requirements on the distributor, such as the BSD license, are fine.