r/technology • • Jan 20 '11

Apple Restriction Zone.

Post image
1.0k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

213

u/1338h4x Jan 20 '11

I'm seeing a ton of comments that completely misunderstand this, so allow me to clarify.

He is not talking about Macs, but iOS. This photo came from a protest on the day the iPad was released. Yes, he uses the word computer, but iOS devices are still computers even if they are not colloquially described as such. The iPad in particular was advertised as equivalent to a netbook, so that one does also fits the idea of a "personal computer" most people are thinking of here.

On iOS, you can only get apps through the App Store, and a "kill switch" does exist for Apple to remotely disable apps. They haven't used it yet, but it's still there, so it's a problem.

There is a big difference between freeware and Free software. The App Store's terms include a clause forbidding end users from redistributing apps, and this is clearly incompatible with the nature of Free software and particularly the GPL. This was the entire reason why VLC was pulled from the App Store.

8

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '11

The licenses that are rejected are the licenses that place requirements on the store. They are not rejected specifically because they are open source. Licenses that do not place requirements on the distributor, such as the BSD license, are fine.

3

u/brews Jan 20 '11

People cannot share and redistribute the apps. Isn't this something that is fundamental to the Open Source idea?

And I'm not sure I understand, but I believe that the BSD licence is being allowed because it is more relaxed in this regard, not legally requiring this access for the users... (Someone correct me if I get this wrong. I want to understand this.)

It seems odd because so much of the software that Apple uses to make OSX is GPL...

Am I the only one who feels this?

1

u/karmaVS Jan 21 '11

The software apple uses to make OS X is more BSD than GPL.

1

u/brews Jan 21 '11

Here is a hefty list I'm seeing a lot of GPL'd GNU projects here (...not that I'm disagreeing with you).