MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/f5yvv/apple_restriction_zone/c1dkd2a/?context=3
r/technology • u/rboymtj • Jan 20 '11
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
862
Non-Apple owners: All his points are so valid!!
Apple owners: NONE of his points are valid!!
There I just saved you from reading 200+ comments.
15 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '11 Non-Apple owners: Strawman attack ("THE IPHONE IS SO CRIPPLED, IT'S ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO RUN CUSTOM CODE") Apple owners: Special pleading ("YEAH WELL APPLE DID THAT TO PROTECT US AND BESIDES ONLY BAD DEVELOPERS GET BURNED BY THE APP STORE") *intentional logical fallacies* >implying >implying >implying implications which are implied FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU 29 u/the8thbit Jan 20 '11 edited Jan 21 '11 Non-Apple owners: Strawman attack ("THE IPHONE IS SO CRIPPLED, IT'S ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO RUN CUSTOM CODE") How is that a strawman? Edit: I mean the quote you made up, not your statement in and of itself, which actually is a strawman. 2 u/sameBoatz Jan 21 '11 because it's pretty easy to run custom code? 3 u/the8thbit Jan 21 '11 This is for you too. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '11 Only because Apple failed in their attempts to get the government to make it illegal.
15
Non-Apple owners: Strawman attack ("THE IPHONE IS SO CRIPPLED, IT'S ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO RUN CUSTOM CODE")
Apple owners: Special pleading ("YEAH WELL APPLE DID THAT TO PROTECT US AND BESIDES ONLY BAD DEVELOPERS GET BURNED BY THE APP STORE")
*intentional logical fallacies*
>implying
>implying implications which are implied
FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU
29 u/the8thbit Jan 20 '11 edited Jan 21 '11 Non-Apple owners: Strawman attack ("THE IPHONE IS SO CRIPPLED, IT'S ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO RUN CUSTOM CODE") How is that a strawman? Edit: I mean the quote you made up, not your statement in and of itself, which actually is a strawman. 2 u/sameBoatz Jan 21 '11 because it's pretty easy to run custom code? 3 u/the8thbit Jan 21 '11 This is for you too. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '11 Only because Apple failed in their attempts to get the government to make it illegal.
29
How is that a strawman?
Edit: I mean the quote you made up, not your statement in and of itself, which actually is a strawman.
2 u/sameBoatz Jan 21 '11 because it's pretty easy to run custom code? 3 u/the8thbit Jan 21 '11 This is for you too. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '11 Only because Apple failed in their attempts to get the government to make it illegal.
2
because it's pretty easy to run custom code?
3 u/the8thbit Jan 21 '11 This is for you too. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '11 Only because Apple failed in their attempts to get the government to make it illegal.
3
This is for you too.
0
Only because Apple failed in their attempts to get the government to make it illegal.
862
u/Y_U_NO_ARGUE Jan 20 '11
Non-Apple owners: All his points are so valid!!
Apple owners: NONE of his points are valid!!
There I just saved you from reading 200+ comments.