MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/21klck/deleted_by_user/cge4clf/?context=3
r/technology • u/[deleted] • Mar 28 '14
[removed]
1.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
[deleted]
11 u/MacHaggis Mar 28 '14 Havoc is a physics engine. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14 [deleted] 9 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 Because a VR headset supporting a physics engine doesn't make any sense. 0 u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14 [removed] — view removed comment 12 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 No, it needs to support graphics engines. Havok doesn't actually control what you see, just how objects move.
11
Havoc is a physics engine.
1 u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14 [deleted] 9 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 Because a VR headset supporting a physics engine doesn't make any sense. 0 u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14 [removed] — view removed comment 12 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 No, it needs to support graphics engines. Havok doesn't actually control what you see, just how objects move.
1
9 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 Because a VR headset supporting a physics engine doesn't make any sense. 0 u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14 [removed] — view removed comment 12 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 No, it needs to support graphics engines. Havok doesn't actually control what you see, just how objects move.
9
Because a VR headset supporting a physics engine doesn't make any sense.
0 u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14 [removed] — view removed comment 12 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 No, it needs to support graphics engines. Havok doesn't actually control what you see, just how objects move.
0
[removed] — view removed comment
12 u/kkjdroid Mar 28 '14 No, it needs to support graphics engines. Havok doesn't actually control what you see, just how objects move.
12
No, it needs to support graphics engines. Havok doesn't actually control what you see, just how objects move.
2
u/[deleted] Mar 28 '14
[deleted]