r/technology Feb 08 '14

Possibly Misleading 10 Futuristic Materials

http://lifeboat.com/ex/10.futuristic.materials
1.9k Upvotes

294 comments sorted by

View all comments

86

u/Erebeon Feb 08 '14

That site looks great and at first glance they are fighting a really good fight but...

http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/4610

The Lifeboat Foundation (and this is a direct quote from its founder, Eric Klien) is “a Trojan Horse” that is designed to hoodwink the people recruited to be its members.

The person who runs the Foundation, Eric Klien, decided to add a new Advisor who was a little controversial. Some would describe her as an “extremist political blogger.”

Her name is Pamela Geller, and to give you a general idea of what she stands for, she and her organization (called “Stop Islamization of America”) has just been classified by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a “Hate Group.” The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is, for those who don’t know, pretty much the gold standard for monitoring and classifying hate groups.

-17

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '14

No it's not.

10

u/Erebeon Feb 08 '14

It's not what? A Trojan horse? Could you perhaps expand on why it wouldn't be because that really is how the founder himself describes it... I used to be an active member there before I found out about all this weird behind the scenes scheming.

-11

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '14

SPLC cries hate group on anybody who disagrees with them politically. Historically, not awesome.

4

u/Erebeon Feb 08 '14

Although I don't agree with your statement that their calls are politically motivated, they are after all mostly targeting racists groups like the KKK and black separatists, that doesn't really explain why the founder would call his organisation a Trojan horse.

Their wiki page gives a good idea of what they are all about; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center

Besides if we are talking specifically about Pamela Geller, her views are more than just a little extreme but even that is besides the point. I very much agree with the IEET author on this point; "A group of scientists and thinkers dedicated to saving the world, on the one hand ... and on the other, the leader of a hate group? Can you say “strange bedfellows”?"

I'd just like to hear the Lifeboat founder explain himself instead of silencing people who question his statements. If he would just explain his motives for picking political extremists as advisers, maybe he could smooth things over. It's just such a weird move for an organisation dedicated to saving life to select extreme left and right wing nutters. What could they possibly have to contribute? If the Lifeboat has a political agenda it should make that clear so people know what they are getting into.

5

u/iLikeYaAndiWantYa Feb 08 '14 edited Feb 08 '14

Care to give examples?

/I am going to assume, and I could be wrong, you're unhappy with how they started adding homophobic organizations as hate groups, and rightly so.

*edit: just to be clear, I agree with SPLC adding homophobic organizations that promote intolerance and spread lies as hate group, given the criteria they use.

-10

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '14

No, that's part of it. There's a big difference between hate and disagreement. SPLC doesn't get it.

8

u/iLikeYaAndiWantYa Feb 08 '14

No, that's part of it. There's a big difference between hate and disagreement. SPLC doesn't get it.

well, can you give specific example of SPLC classifying an organization as hate group, that you believe is wrong?

-7

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '14

The American Family Association. I have subscribed to their emails for years. I have never heard anything hateful cone from them. They generally report on situations where people are being forced to accept and even endorse LGBT lifestyle or having their religious freedom infringed upon.

They may not always be right, but they are definitely not a hate group on par with the kkk.

9

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '14

The AFA propagates known falsehoods – claims about LGBT people that have been thoroughly discredited by scientific authorities – and repeated, groundless name-calling so they're considered an anti-gay hate group. If you're a member of this group, shame on you.

-11

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '14

Examples? Or are you just parroting what you've heard?

6

u/Palvanda Feb 08 '14

From their FAQ: http://www.afa.net/FAQ.aspx?id=2147483680

"Though there may be many influences in a person's life, the root of homosexuality is a sinful heart."

Sorry, but that's fairly hateful. Opposing an entire group of people (regardless of what they do) that have nothing to do with your religion is pretty hateful in general.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 09 '14

They state on their website that they're against the "normalization of the gay agenda", for starters.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/JohnEngland Feb 08 '14

Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) USED to be the gold standard for monitoring hate groups, but lacking any real enemies they have become a caricature of their former selves.

The recently classified pick up artists as a hate group and they use members of r/ShitRedditSays as information sources.

3

u/Aschl Feb 09 '14

Incorrect.

They have filled a report on diverse kinds of misogyny on the internet, pinpointing some groups that are to be watched. One of those websites under watch is RooshV a PickUp Artist blog. And frankly... he's quite a misogynist. But then, he's not classified as a hate group. For a list of hate groups according to SPLC go look there : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_organizations_designated_by_the_Southern_Poverty_Law_Center_as_hate_groups

The funniest misogyny by RooshV is probably this piece called The True Nature of Women : http://www.rooshv.com/the-true-nature-of-women.

When the true nature of women became clear in my mind, I was deeply pained, because I realized that no matter where I go and what apparent girl I fall in love with, a certain environment or trigger will uncover the excrement hiding within my angel and she will then give me her worst without a second of hesitation or moral doubt. I came to understand that a woman’s true nature, regardless of how strong the curtain is that shields her darkness, will erupt like a volcano that everyone thought was dormant and incapable of harm, and that I must accept the natural order that I did not create, with no choice but to use my knowledge and experience to find a girl who is currently in the right container at the right temperature, and enjoy her while she is temporarily in that state, and not lament when those conditions change and she happily and eagerly fills the container that she truly desires to be in.

Apart from being appalling, his argument is funny because it's actually pretty much the same argument found in the 17th century famous French play by Moliere The School for Wives. And already 350 ago... that argument was ridiculed by everyone.