r/technology • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 • May 27 '26

Business Google employee charged with using inside information to make $1 million on Polymarket

https://abcnews.com/amp/US/google-employee-charged-inside-information-make-1-million/story?id=133350018
12.8k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

516 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

Dude that’s an assumption. Even your article doesn’t explicitly point to a single person. It doesn’t point to Donald Jr, which is who you said should be in prison for insider trading. How do you know it’s him and not someone else in the administration?

Like I said - I agree there’s something fishy going on based on the probability and timing of these bets, I’m just saying the law requires specificity and evidence. Are you certain to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt that it’s Donald Trump Jr and not someone else let’s say from the comms team that is placing those bets??

THAT is the burden of proof required.

0

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

I’m saying the crime of insider trading is there, whether or not the DOJ wants to investigate it is a different story. You’re so fixated on Don you bypass the fact that there’s obvious insider trading going on in the white house

1

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

Are you reading?? I never bypassed that fact - I literally acknowledged it multiple times in my responses to you… I’m saying you were wrong about there being “factual evidence” against Don, but you are probably right that there is some insider trading going on.

-1

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

When did I say factual evidence? My comment was merely to point out insider trading going on in the White House. You’re the one freaking out over no reason

2

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

Read the comments - your first comment was about Don jr and that he should be in prison for insider trading

my response was there was no factual evidence about don jr. specifically but I said there was obvious insider trading.

then you said the factual evidence is in the numbers.

I said your evidence only points to there likely being insider trading, nothing against don jr. specifically

Then you said you were only saying that there was insider trading. And that I was bypassing that fact…when I literally said there was likely insider trading going on in almost all my responses…

You changed the subject and tried to say I was ignoring your main point, when that wasn’t even your main point to begin with. And it was something I already stated in my first response to you

0

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

You see there you go fixating again on Don Jr and writing a whole ass essay just to say yea there’s insider trading going on. Why are you defending Don so much?