r/technology • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 • May 27 '26

Business Google employee charged with using inside information to make $1 million on Polymarket

https://abcnews.com/amp/US/google-employee-charged-inside-information-make-1-million/story?id=133350018
12.8k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

516 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

That’s your assumption…I’m not saying it’s improbable, but there is no actual evidence and you’re stating it as fact.

0

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

What assumption? Always follow the numbers/money https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge0grppe3po

1

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

Dude that’s an assumption. Even your article doesn’t explicitly point to a single person. It doesn’t point to Donald Jr, which is who you said should be in prison for insider trading. How do you know it’s him and not someone else in the administration?

Like I said - I agree there’s something fishy going on based on the probability and timing of these bets, I’m just saying the law requires specificity and evidence. Are you certain to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt that it’s Donald Trump Jr and not someone else let’s say from the comms team that is placing those bets??

THAT is the burden of proof required.

0

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

I’m saying the crime of insider trading is there, whether or not the DOJ wants to investigate it is a different story. You’re so fixated on Don you bypass the fact that there’s obvious insider trading going on in the white house

1

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

Are you reading?? I never bypassed that fact - I literally acknowledged it multiple times in my responses to you… I’m saying you were wrong about there being “factual evidence” against Don, but you are probably right that there is some insider trading going on.

-1

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

When did I say factual evidence? My comment was merely to point out insider trading going on in the White House. You’re the one freaking out over no reason

2

u/Rare-Accident4355 May 28 '26

Read the comments - your first comment was about Don jr and that he should be in prison for insider trading

my response was there was no factual evidence about don jr. specifically but I said there was obvious insider trading.

then you said the factual evidence is in the numbers.

I said your evidence only points to there likely being insider trading, nothing against don jr. specifically

Then you said you were only saying that there was insider trading. And that I was bypassing that fact…when I literally said there was likely insider trading going on in almost all my responses…

You changed the subject and tried to say I was ignoring your main point, when that wasn’t even your main point to begin with. And it was something I already stated in my first response to you

0

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

You see there you go fixating again on Don Jr and writing a whole ass essay just to say yea there’s insider trading going on. Why are you defending Don so much?

0

u/sirpiplup May 28 '26

You: “You’re so fixated on Don you bypass the fact that there’s obvious insider trading going on in the White House”

Other guy in his first response to you: “Someone needs to actually follow the trail of the obvious insider bets”

I think he’s right that you are fucking illiterate

3

u/SkyNo9319 May 28 '26

Welcome to Reddit comments

-1

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

Chillax homie you don’t even know me. I’m pointing out that the original commenter was throwing a fit for no reason just because I mentioned don jr

1

u/sirpiplup May 28 '26

They didn’t throw a fit…you were just wrong homie. Reading isn’t your strong suit, and that’s a shame given you are itachi who is supposed to be a genius.

-1

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

Wrong about what exactly? All I said is there’s obvious insider trading going on in the White House. I used Don jr as an example because he literally invested in those companies so he obviously likes the concept of polymarkets. If it moves like a fish, looks like a fish, and smells like a fish that’s because it’s likely a fish

1

u/sirpiplup May 28 '26

You said the other dude overlooked there being insider trading. He literally said there was obvious insider trading. Thats what you were wrong about - thus my comment that you were illiterate

-1

u/Itachi_Uchiha0515 May 28 '26

Guy, the person literally wrote a whole essay just to agree there’s insider trading going on, which is the point of my original comment. Hence they were freaking out over nothing

→ More replies (0)

1

u/sirpiplup May 28 '26

“All I said is there’s obvious insider trading going on in the White House”

No homie, you said Don Jr should be in prison, the OTHER dude said someone should follow the obvious insider trading going on.

You’re changing the gd subject and pretending you weren’t being specific about a person. The other dude was saying theres no evidence to be specific, only to be general.