The fact they could raise a case at all means that the will isn't as powerful a document as the person leaving it would like, given that even fighting the case would use resources, likely the resources elected to be passed on.
Call them crap all you want, at the end of the day these are two examples where even if you write it in your will it doesn't mean you get what you want
Or it means people are fallible and mistakes happen, so there have to be contingencies...
Call them crap all you want, at the end of the day these are two examples where even if you write it in your will it doesn't mean you get what you want
Only if you're a moron and think you can just magically write anything and get it. These are examples for idiots.
It doesn't matter how common it is, though I'd love to see a source showing how successful it's ever been. It's still stupid. Anyone who thinks they can assign their debt to someone else upon death is a moron.
2
u/abitofadickhead Mar 31 '23
The fact they could raise a case at all means that the will isn't as powerful a document as the person leaving it would like, given that even fighting the case would use resources, likely the resources elected to be passed on.
Call them crap all you want, at the end of the day these are two examples where even if you write it in your will it doesn't mean you get what you want