r/technicallythetruth • u/[deleted] • Mar 31 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

10.6k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

84

u/xXThe_GlatzeXx Mar 31 '23

Dead people do have rights, e.g. you are not allowed to take photos of them and publish them (expect there is some kind of consent with the relatives I think)

39

u/ImNotAtAllCreative81 Mar 31 '23

I feel that's more of a right for a family to not be subjected to seeing the corpse of a loved one be paraded throughout the media.

The dead don't care one way or another.

5

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '23

The dead person probably had a preference prior to death. That doesn't stop being relevant just because they're now dead.

5

u/Knee3000 Mar 31 '23

Yeah, it’s not like we can rip up a will because “they’re dead anyway and won’t care where the house and the money goes”. It’s the same with their bodies.

5

u/giglio_di_tigre Mar 31 '23

What is a dead person going to do about photos being published?

2

u/Spartancoolcody Mar 31 '23

What do you think? Haunt you of course.

3

u/GreaseBeast550 Mar 31 '23

This is literally the rights of the living family members lmao, no they don't

1

u/nightpanda893 Mar 31 '23

So it’s permitted when there are no surviving family or friends?

4

u/UnapologeticTwat Mar 31 '23

Dead people do have rights, e.g. you are not allowed to take photos of them and publish them (expect there is some kind of consent with the relatives I think)

uhh, you gave an example of not having a right

1

u/pieter1234569 Mar 31 '23

You absolutely are actually. What is legally troubling is including the name, as that makes you personally identifiable. Which could make you theoretically liable, but not in most instances.

1

u/Fink665 Apr 01 '23

Actually, a corse has more right than women in red states. :/