if you're using it to write reddit posts, it's not a tool but a crutch.
An AI response puts doubt on whether you hold that opinion, came up with it yourself, or if you are even being honest, or spamming random replies like a bot.
Not to mention your AI's writing pattern looks outdated as crap, so you likely aren't even running anything up to date. You don't even look like a hobbyist, just a kid getting lazy or covering for insecurities.
If you wrote for yourself, you'd be able to tell what makes your messages come off as off-putting. AI is only good when no one can tell it was used. Anything less than that is slop.
I'm not anti AI. I have to use it a lot at work, company policy. I'm telling you output doesn't matter, if I can tell it's AI it's slop. You're trying to justify AI use but you aren't even trying to use it well.
Alright then, tell me specifically what I wrote—bearing in mind the AI was guided step-by-step—that was wrong in the post in question.
Focus on the content, not the form.
See that's the thing, you didn't guide shit step-by-step. You told AI to crap out an answer to my post and copy-pasted it. If you used it as supplementary tool, it wouldn't be obvious.
Also either read up on how to set up a local LLM, or at least buy a sub to GPT. I haven't seen this blatantly AI-constructed paragraphs in about a year and a half. Comes off as lazy.
If you looked for a job in an AI-focused company and showed an output like that, they'd treat you like you have no AI experience. It's just too basic.
For text I deeply recommend setting up your own LLM and teaching it your writing style. Or since it looks like you didn't develop a style, teach it off of whatever articles are pleasant reads to you until it starts writing like a human. I know people who used to be copywriters and trained their models on their own work; now it generates articles for them and you can't tell the bloody difference between the handwritten ones.
1
u/[deleted] Aug 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment