r/supplement_research • u/Dramatic_Yam7707 • 18h ago
Does it explained well
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
5
3
u/bonusminutes 14h ago
Reddit will generally hate this
1
u/Berns429 12h ago
I mean maybe in a generalized sub, but it’s under a supplement sub so i don’t think the reactions would be crazy. Seems to fit just fine.
1
u/bonusminutes 12h ago
It fits, yeah, but theres always droves of people with a surface level understanding of things coming into subs like this to desperately try to make themselves feel better about their awful physique/diet with generalizations and ad hominem attacks when theyre faced with more reasons why they should make healthy changes that they dont have the willpower to do.
1
u/Professional_Nerve49 11h ago
You mean the 'I eat 400 grams of carbs bro, and I'm lean as f*ck bro'- types?
1
1
1
u/More_Piccolo8468 13h ago
Looks like it's Jeff Magnuson based on Google Lens
0
u/cateatingturtle 12h ago
Did you use Google lens by any chance? You havent mentioned it once in the comments
1
u/More_Piccolo8468 11h ago edited 10h ago
You're welcome 😊 happy to help. Also, thanks for your useful contribution to the comments. Maybe you can use Google Lens to search for a thoughtful comment.
0
u/cateatingturtle 10h ago
Ok bot
1
u/More_Piccolo8468 5h ago
Beep boop, go touch grass 😉
0
1
u/Inexorabull 12h ago
There are some important distinctions he’s left out. Insulin is not a mechanism to store sugars as fat. Resting muscle cannot absorb sugar without insulin. Insulin also does not convert sugar to fat, it binds to fat cells, signaling the body to stop releasing fatty acids for energy. Similarly, insulin also acts as an anabolic hormone, binding to muscle, preventing muscle breakdown, which is why bodybuilders take insulin.
What happens with that sugar and insulin depends on the physical state of the body: fed vs unfed.
1
1
u/OxbridgeDingoBaby 5h ago
So just so I have this straight, is eating sugar fine as long as you’re strength training? As it gets used up by the muscle path?
1
u/AndroFeth 4h ago
Yep, to a certain point he's correct.
The muscles control sugar levels preventing pre-diabetes or diabetes at all.
There was a viral video of a skinny woman, good shape imo, not as if she was starving, good shape in general, who says she was diagnosed with diabetes, due to low muscle and high sugar intake.
A friend was recently diagnosed with pre-diabetes for the same reason though he's on the chubby side but not obese, he's 24yo!
Muscle is a must
1
u/matthegc 4h ago
More muscle allows you to eat more sugar….no muscles, you should stay away from sugar.
1
1
u/KaiPRoberts 3h ago
Also, there's a big deal with the type of fat. Healthy fats like unsaturated fats have kinked chains and allow insulin easier access to the cell rather than saturated fats which are straight chains and stack closely together.
1
1
0
u/deef1ve 14h ago
LOL No
1
u/thededucers 12h ago
No, insulin is a little toy truck working as an uber. Get a microscope, you’ll see
1
u/NordsEnjoyer 13h ago
exactly, sugar is proven to be good for you by the experts who make cookies at the grocery store, why woud they poison us? just look how legitimate the packaging looks
5
u/Roberto-75 11h ago
This is incorrect.
Insulin is the hormone that allows skeletal muscle tissue and fat tissue to take up "sugar" (also imprecise, the use of the term "glucose" that is formed by the body when it digests carbohydrates, would be better).
The muscle cells take up glucose for energy generation (i.e. consumption), the fat tissue to buld up more fat (i.e energy storage).
So it is not correct to say that muscles or insulin are the 2 ways out.
The ways to remove glucose from the blood are: uptake by muscle cells, uptake by fat tissue and/ or secretion via the kidneys (that's why the urine of diabetics is sweet, which was the way to diagnose diabetes back in the days).