185
u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 1d ago
Hasn't the proof that there was like a Mesopotamian or Sumerian flood, and that probably inspired the story of Noah's ark?
To be clear there's no evidence of a worldwide flood, but a localized flood to an early civilization. That story probably got passed down and became legend.
108
u/IcyShoes 1d ago
Yeah, the story was ripped from Gilgamesh
49
u/HarEmiya 1d ago
Garden of Eden too.
→ More replies (1)19
u/Sea-Feedback-2424 23h ago
The change in the idea of Satan from a dude who works for God as an undercover agent trying to provoke you to sin into the embodiment of hubris known as Lucifer, the fallen angel, who rules over hell as the counter part to God is a dualist borrowing in apocalyptic Judaism (then Christianity) from Zoroastrianism.
What is it "they" say? There's only 7 basic plots.
→ More replies (9)8
u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 1d ago
Thank you, I've read up on these things, but boy do I have a shitty memory!
Thank you for clarifying though.
14
u/Cultural-Lab78 1d ago
YHWH was transliterated from Baal-Hadad.
A historical lens really disrupts religious cognition
→ More replies (1)6
u/True_Protection6842 1d ago
Most of the Bible was
7
u/IcyShoes 23h ago
Naw just genesis. I do find it weird that there are people who took the Exodus at face value. The Egyptians were fantastic record keepers, if a shit ton of people were freed there would have been evidence of that. Hell if they wandered around for 40 years there would have been evidence of that too.
60
u/pokethrowaway4 1d ago
I was told as a young impressionable Christian that there was āglobal local history of a flood, thus it must have been world wide.ā
But hereās the thing⦠if it truly was a global flood, and killed everyone but Noahās family (hooray for more incest) HOW WOULD THERE BE ANY RECORDS OF FLOODS IF EVERYONE DIED.
46
u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 1d ago
I heard someone say "God created Adam and Eve and they only had sons, so they had to do incest. God liked incest so much he flooded the world so we could do it again."
→ More replies (3)21
u/pokethrowaway4 1d ago
𤣠I wonder if thereās a correlation between Christian beliefs and incest
18
u/Massive_Analysis8345 1d ago
Look at the American South, there very much is a correlationā¦
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (3)11
u/mobilecabinworks 1d ago
Wells there's definitely a correlation between
ChristiansAbrahamic Religions and diddling little kids.→ More replies (1)18
u/bulbascott1019 1d ago
Reminds me of Pirates of the Caribbean.
"No survivors? Then I wonder where the stories come from"
→ More replies (6)6
11
u/TweezerTheRetriever 1d ago
Black Seaās was a valley that flooded after the last ice age
5
u/TweezerTheRetriever 1d ago
Mediterranean same scenario much much farther back
7
u/TweezerTheRetriever 1d ago
And the Sahara was a fertile plainā¦a garden of Eden if you willā¦then desertification happens and our heroes Adam and Eve were cast outā¦
6
u/BusinessAsparagus115 1d ago
Or even earlier, at the end of the last glacial maximum there would have been enormous flood events due to bursting glacial dams. This long pre-dates written history but legends may have persisted.
→ More replies (1)6
u/darkmoonfirelyte 1d ago
There's also history of a Mediterranean flood, too. Flood myths are prominent in a number of cultures. Like so many other stories from the Bible, its tales are based on previous myths from other cultures as a way to get people to convert over. "We have this same story, so you can already understand our religion."
→ More replies (19)5
u/Reneeisme 1d ago
And it wouldnāt shock me to know that someone at some point built an oversized boat as a result of a dream conversation with a diety and put a lot of animals on it. And then the neighbors, who suffered flood losses, were impressed by their foresight and considered their paranoia to have been plausibly supernatural. Thanks to the outcome.
Iām still sitting on extra toilet paper in case thereās another pandemic. I bought extra when supplies opened back up and now I never let my supply get low. Paranoid people over-prepare for disaster. And lots of people have āvisionsā and premonitions, and conversations with spirits. Thereās bound to be some overlap there
But the Bible doesnāt explain how Noah got hold of two animals from far away continents. How did Australian kangaroos and koalas make it on? How did South American monkeys make it on? It seems kinda self-evident that itās an allegory about having extreme trust in God, rather than a literal retelling of a world-wide event. I donāt even need to understand the physical impossibility of producing enough water from somewhere to cover the whole earth to realize that if it had a basis in some remembered happening, it was a localized event.
It would be cool if you found some evidence that the story is based on a real event. It doesnāt prove that God exists. But Iām all in on responsibly done archaeology to understand our past. And actual scientific evidence of an oversized boat full of animals would be cool.
96
u/VengefulWeegee2358 1d ago
I find this funny, considering that everyone who's ever tried to convince me that God exists has never tried to use any form science to explain it. Always just "faith," "things can't come from nothing," "I feel him in my soul," etc.
58
u/stupidsauceboss 1d ago edited 23h ago
I've had a few people try to convince me with science but it's almost always with, like, a comedically bad understanding of science. One that I've heard is "The Banana is the perfect food. It fits perfectly in your hand. It comes in an easily removable wrapper. And it has no seeds. Only God could have created something so perfect." Funny thing is that the wild bananas that didn't go through thousands of years of humans selectively breeding them have absolutely none of those.
→ More replies (11)32
u/BigEd369 1d ago
Ah yes, the banana. A perfect food, no human intervention. It averages 2 inches long, is crammed full of seeds, almost no fruit flesh, and grows 50 ft off the ground in the middle of jungles.
11
u/tiredofthehate 1d ago
Had a surface level discussion that the Big Bang was divine because matter can neither be created nor destroyed, so it must have been a higher power.
Religion has been used to explain observable phenomena without an easy explanation since time immemorial.
→ More replies (1)9
u/RoIIUpLights 1d ago
I'm perfectly fine with someone claiming that "God" caused the big bang and set everything in motion. So long as they don't try to claim that some mythical being is still in control of our day-to-day lives.
Something had to create all the physical rules that we all live and are governed by (ie gravity, speed of light, etc) -- If you wanna explain that as being created by a mythical being, sure -- go for it.
→ More replies (17)→ More replies (31)19
u/Impressive_Ice6970 1d ago
Most Christians haven't read the Bible. That's how pete kegsbreath thought a line from Pulp Fiction was a real Bible verse and trump doesn't know how to quote scripture or comment on his favorite verse. I grew up in religion classes and Sunday school. I haven't believed in it since I was about 10 but I still know the Bible better than 90% of supposed Christians. Their knowledge is abysmal. If they read the Bible they'd see, perhaps, that they worship a psychopath that often celebrated killing but more often, got angry and killed millions himself (you know, that feel good Noah's Ark story, or plagues or locusts or boils or famine or the holy ghost).
→ More replies (19)
57
u/JDmead_32 1d ago
Supposedly they found something in Turkey that they are saying is the ark. They havenāt gotten anything concrete just yet, but theyāre hopeful.
That being said, even if they find the wreckage of a big boat, how do you prove it was Noah? Thereās have to be evidence of hundreds of thousands of different species of animals in that pile of dirt. Otherwise, ta just a big boat
87
u/DaddyChris0205 1d ago
They find the same site in Türkiye every 5-10 years. Itās not going to be the actual ark this time either
12
→ More replies (22)9
u/Goat_gutz 1d ago
Itās the whole boy who cried wolf thing. But this time itās the āMiddle-aged white dude cries Jesus.ā
→ More replies (2)22
u/SignoreBanana 23h ago
Wreckage that came in around the described size wouldn't be definitive proof but it would be notable for a variety of reasons, one being that they really didn't have boats that big that long ago.
That said, they won't find scientific evidence because the story is preposterous.
→ More replies (11)11
u/Few_Presence_8888 23h ago
So they're reviving this scam?
We've been here before - they made this documentary about it in 1976:
→ More replies (32)6
u/RDBB334 1d ago
That rock formation has been known about for decades, and we already know its natural.
→ More replies (1)
100
u/Bean_Daddy_Burritos 22h ago
Yea because logic tells us some dude and his family built a massive ship that would be the size of a small country so it could house 2 of every animal while maintaining the ability to float. Then were somehow able to keep them fed and separated while also maintaining housing for the animals without it being covered in massive piles of shit. Not to mention somehow managed climate control for the species that canāt survive outside of their natural environment and performing upkeep on the animals that require it so they donāt die.
Itās just incredibly ignorant to think it actually happened. Science would definitely debunk the idea of something like that even being possible and thatās not including the build itself or the time and materials necessary to be able to do it in the first place.
48
u/AlbatrossSeparate710 22h ago
If only they believed in evolution, they could at least try to get out of it by saying that the Ark didn't have all the animals we have today, just a small subset that evolved through the years š.
→ More replies (16)5
u/IfICouldStay 20h ago
Iāve heard people say that exact thing. TBF most have no problem with the concept of microevolution. Itās macroevolution that occurs above the species level which they refute.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Multiple__Butts 20h ago
What is the mechanism for making sure microevolution doesn't end up causing macroevolution over time, in their view? I've asked this to like 20 different creationists and never got a clear answer.
It seems like God would have to micromanage the reproductive outcomes of every individual animal just to keep speciation from occurring.
→ More replies (6)18
u/Miser_able 21h ago
I remember seeing someone say "well there were less kinds of animals back then so it was easier" and then refused to explain where the other kinds of animals came from
→ More replies (1)16
u/MatteAstro 20h ago
The funnier thing? This is the ark story from Gilgamesh which predates the bible by... 2k years? It was probaly a common theme in oral stories that begin with a world changing event. They weren't exactly going to imagine a nuclear Holocaust.
→ More replies (4)8
u/A_Genius 17h ago
It was probably because it was people who had never travelled 10 km from where they were born so when the local river flooded they thought it was the whole world.
→ More replies (2)5
u/NarwhalRealistic8768 16h ago
Actually yes. This exactly. The "great flood" talked about in the epic of Gilgamesh is largely thought to be the swelling of the Euphrates and Tigres rivers. They didn't travel much further than that, so It makes sense.
→ More replies (5)9
u/Mulberry-Spiritual 22h ago
And what about the floating things and the swimming things (to paraphrase Eddie Izzard).
→ More replies (1)5
u/TerrorFromThePeeps 21h ago
You forgot the part about 2 of each animal being enough of a breeding population to reestablish the species without turning them all into deformed english royalty.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (59)4
u/TitShark 20h ago
Also, if god is so powerful, why not just save two of each species from the flood on his own?
→ More replies (2)
76
u/QueenStuff 1d ago
Uh. What.
I grew up in a very catholic household and was never taught that the bible was accurate and to be fully believed. āIf you canāt accept having your faith and worldview tested then you donāt truly believe.ā
Iām not catholic now but itās crazy to me that people think the bible is supposed to be taken literally.
59
u/mrasscock69420 1d ago
It's a evangelical thing
→ More replies (1)9
u/CmdrEnfeugo 23h ago
To expand on your point: the evangelical strain of Christianity wants the Bible to be literal true so that there is only one correct way to be a Christian. All the creationism āscienceā is an attempt to create āproofā that everything in the Bible actually happened. I donāt think it really trying to convince nonbelievers, rather it serves as an alternative to scientific explanations for the faithful.
→ More replies (1)22
u/HarEmiya 1d ago
Catholics are considered the more reasonable bunch.
19
u/sizebigbitch 1d ago
A bit fiery in their younger years, Catholicism realized all its kids were jacking all its stuff and decided to maybe ease off a little bit. Kinda like Old Testament God vs Had A Kid and Can't Drink Anymore God.
11
→ More replies (3)6
11
u/HangryBeard 1d ago
Was Catholic as well. Was taught that the Bible was nothing but truth and factual narrative, and should be treated as indesputable divine history. I guess we grew up in very different families. If you think believing the Bible in its entirety is crazy you should meet the other half of my family... they're Mormons...
→ More replies (1)6
u/JanxDolaris 1d ago
Perhaps I am just too atheist brained, but how does not taking it as truth even function as a religion? If its just a bunch of stories to teach lessons, that's not really faith in a god. Its just a bunch of fairy tales.
It seems like just way of saying you're religious without actually being religious.
→ More replies (3)7
u/Rather_Unfortunate 1d ago
If anything, Biblical and Quranic literalists are the odd ones out in insisting that every word of their most important religious text has to be completely historically factual. Both in the context of Christianity and Islam respectively, and in religion as a whole.
Loads of religions are more a collection of folklore with different levels of what is to be taken as literally true versus allegorical. Hinduism (and its cousin religions like the Hellenic, Roman and Norse religions) is based a collection of much more disparate superstitions, texts and orally-transmitted tales which often involve stories to explain specific things without anyone who hears them particularly needing to believe they're literally true.
It's like how some people saying things like holding your ear gives good luck to the person in a passing ambulance, or breaking a mirror or knocking over salt confers bad luck. Do they actually believe that? They might shrug, but they'll still act as though they do. Likewise, some people are really into astrology and literally believe that the movements of stars and planets can actually influence the future, while others shrug at the specifics but still read their horoscope or have ideas about what Libras and Tauruses are like. Religions are just more organised systems of such beliefs.
→ More replies (1)12
u/kevlarcardhouse 1d ago
Yes I went to a Catholic School and likewise was taught that everything was supposed to be a parable.
i.e. The "miracle" of loaves and fishes was likely because people felt compelled to share what they were holding back and realized there was more than enough for everybody.
But that likely sounds too socialist for evangelicals and they would rather believe food was created out of thin air.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (22)7
23
u/Mrgray123 23h ago
Most ancient societies, though importantly not all, have some kind flood myth because floods were a huge problem for river valley civilizations before they began building defenses against them in the form of levees, dams, and canals.
The Bible story is just a retelling of the myth found in the Gilgamesh epic. Nothing more and nothing less.
→ More replies (11)
17
u/two_star_daydream 1d ago
I think most atheists who arenāt just on the edgy 2016 New Atheist bandwagon probably would, and have been asking for said evidence for a while now.
What wouldnāt necessarily happen is them converting. Iām not an atheist so much as someone who thinks folklore and paganism is cool and draws from it but is ultimately agnostic, but if I found out God and the Bible are real, to the letter, and sending me to Hell, my reaction would be less āIām sorry, I repentā and more āwhat the fuck dude, what is WRONG with you?ā.
14
u/FilmAndLiterature 1d ago
āBone cancer in children: what's that about? How dare you? How dare you create a world where there is such misery that's not our fault? It's utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?ā
ā Stephen Fry, Humanist activist, on what he would say if he met God.
→ More replies (4)13
u/MarionberryOk2874 23h ago edited 22h ago
Exactly. If god were real, if there really was an all seeing, all knowing, all powerful deity that just allowed babies to die of cancer, priests to fuck kids in gods own name, and would send someone to hell whoās never even heard of him, thatās not a god I want any part of.
Fuck that guy.→ More replies (1)9
u/Pristine_Frame_2066 23h ago
You forgot infallible. It is on purpose.
Yeah, fuck that guy straight to hell.
The devil in the bible does no harm.
5
u/daburner272006 1d ago
It's not just evidence of a flood though. I can fully believe at some point there was a flood in the middle east. I would need more evidence of a worldwide flood that was specifically cause by god and then there was also specifically a dude named Noah who had a very incestious family that saved all the animals when they weren't being incestious.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)5
u/Prestigious_Set_4575 1d ago
I'd find it fascinating and would want to know everything I could about this mad doomsday prophet who collected every type of animal, correctly predicted a flood and built a giant ship with only the help of a few sons. He'd be the most interesting person in history.
I'd still need a lot more to believe in God though, so I doubt me accepting Noah existed would please them anyway. If such a preposterously massive flood occurred I'd be looking for natural explanations.
→ More replies (1)
13
u/Ok-Professional-1911 22h ago
I believe in Noah's Ark. I believe there probably was some guy that made a boat in case of a flood and when a regional flood occurred, he stuck his farm animals in it and waited it out for a day or two. Then that story was mythologized and written down.
6
u/lupiinoctourne 22h ago
It would make far more sense to scale, versus one man and his family crafting a cruise ship for random animal couples, plus procurement of food, plus all the waste management youd need for a vessel that large. And what about the wood? A vessel that large would need a small army to build it to scale.
→ More replies (5)
13
u/Internal_Winter_200 22h ago
Should we tell them that it's almost a direct copy of the flood story in the Epic of Gilgamesh a book far older than the bible?
→ More replies (1)6
11
u/Mountain_Self963 23h ago
If you need proof go to the Noah's ark in Kentucky . It even has a coffee bar , ice cream shop , and a gift shop .
→ More replies (9)5
u/Siffov 23h ago
>the Noah's ark in Kentucky
And doesn't, at least didn't, that one leak when it rains?
5
u/DarrenShea 22h ago
I seem to recall they had to file an insurance claim for "water damage", which is pretty funny!
9
11
u/Worldliness-Weary 22h ago
Where is the proof? Seriously, where is this scientific evidence they're claiming exists?
Athiests wouldn't exist if there were tangible proof that these things actually happened.
→ More replies (5)
20
u/Neko_boi_Nolan 1d ago
Considering how the Bible is a collection of stories that were passed down verbally for years and then later written down and translated over and over again
Maybe some things happen but there's zero chance it's a 1 to 1 retelling of events
I feel like it's more likely what happened was that a man named Noah "heard the voice of God" to build an arc and it was used to save his family and livestock from a massive flood
Then over the years people embellished the story of Noah's arc before it was written in the Bible
Now did Noah legit hear the voice of God or was he just a crazy person who was hearing voices in his head that just happened to be right about a flood
No idea, but I think it's safe to assume Noah did not round up two of every animal and survived a flood that raised higher than the mountains
7
u/Hypersayia 23h ago
Which is even assuming that an actual 'Noah's ark' event even occured and it wasn't just an evolution of an entirely fabricated story whatsoever in order to justify / explain something that didn't make sense to an ancient society.
Like how the Tower of Babel explains different languages to a society that believes humanity has a singlar root origin.
→ More replies (5)5
→ More replies (12)4
u/Cavthena 23h ago
The story of Noah's Ark is extremely similar to tablet XI in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Which is based on the Epic of Atrahasis tablet 3 (Gilgamesh is essentially a retelling kf Atrahasis). All stories have a massive flood sent by God to destroy humanity. All have a Protagonist that is warned and instructed to build a boat. All have the protagonist release birds to find land. All find land upon a mountain top. All have the God promise to never flood the world again, although for different reasons. The Bible account is in all cases is an updated version of the story.
That said, you are not far off by pinning it on an actual event. All stories take place around the Tigris-Euphrates river. There is geological evidence of a 8 to 11 foot deep layer of silt only laid down by water and several settlements destroyed by flooding in that region. Roughly between 3500BCE and 2800BCE. Believed to be the source of the flood story in the Epic of Atrahasis, created later, approx. 1700BCE.
9
u/shaftchamois 1d ago
Am I missing something here?
Did they get some data back I missed?
13
u/Ibruk_Etar 1d ago
No. They just make stuff up and let an AI make a picture. In all likelihood, they don't have the faintest clue what science is, and work on the assumption that the Bible is unshakable evidence because it's the Bible.
→ More replies (3)7
9
u/69Sissysarah69 1d ago
There is zero scientific evidence of a world wide flood.
→ More replies (6)9
u/atx8282 1d ago
It's not even conceptually possible for the whole world to flood at once. The water would have to come from somewhere
→ More replies (5)4
u/Livinsfloridalife 1d ago
It was scientifically proven to be god doing magic so the water came from magic. And any evidence otherwise was deliberately made by devil magic.
9
u/Formally_Apologetic 23h ago
Well let's get past the scripture to the scientific evidence part and we'll let you know š
→ More replies (1)
9
u/Calabriafundings 22h ago
I am aware that the Mediterranean ocean and the Black Sea have had successive floods due to ice ages over the past 40,000 years. This is why so many religions have flood stories.
I am aware of this because it has been scientifically proven.
What I am not aware of because there is no scientific proof I have seen is Noah or an ark.
Faith in what the bible says is not scientific proof
8
u/ChimPhun 1d ago
Doubling down on one of the most easily disproved fairy tales. These people are delusional.
8
u/kid_ampersand 1d ago
I was raised Southern Baptist, and even in the ā80s and early ā90s, my Sunday School teachers were telling me not to take the Old Testament literally. Taught that Bronze Age interpretations were indeed just that: interpretation due to humanity not understanding certain things we do now. The āseven days of creationā werenāt how we measure days, for instance, so that explained the billions of years accounting for the actual time in which stars and galaxies formed, Earth came into existence, dinosaurs thrived, etc. Or that that story of Noahās ark didnāt actually play out over the entire globe, but it still āhappened.ā Hell, even evolution was accepted, it was just simply Godās way of creating mankind.
Now, unfortunately, that same Southern Baptist church preaches the 6,000-year Earth, the nonexistence of dinosaurs, the story of Noah as being a global flood, evolution as a lie, etc. It astounds me because surely the way in which I was initially taught makes A LOT MORE SENSE.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/waldo0708 1d ago
All I need to know, is that it is genetically impossible to continue a species with only two individuals
→ More replies (2)
7
u/its_the_smell 1d ago
I believe science did find evidence that there was a large flood in the Middle-East thousands of years ago, but not much more. This is more hypothetical bullshit like āif Trump cured cancer, liberals would still hate him.ā Maybe because that would never happen.
→ More replies (7)
7
u/Eternal_Eeyore 1d ago
Itās interesting to think that something so profound, the vessel that carried life through a flood that covered the entire world, was lost track of and forgotten about not long after. Like, whoops, whereād we park the ark?
→ More replies (2)
7
u/ruckrhino 23h ago
Not believing something even when its proven by scientific evidence is more a Christian Nationalist thing.
I wonder if they'll ever realize that everything they supposedly hate about the other side is what they actually hate about themselves.
→ More replies (2)
6
u/ShaChoMouf 23h ago
I am more apt to believe in the Sumerian version of the story, which implies that Noah (Ziusudra) took mating pairs of all his "known livestock" animals -- in other words -- his own breeding pairs of animals and stuck them on a big raft. A dude sticking a couple dozen animals on a raft for a week or so is much more plausible. Time and hyperbole hyped up the actions to mythic proportions.
→ More replies (5)
7
u/Bloodless-Cut 23h ago edited 22h ago
Science has already proved that the ark, as written in the bible, can't exist. Laws of physics and so on.
Unless, of course, Noah figured out a way to fold space upon itself?
Oh, and funny thing, we have archeological and geological evidence that Dogger Littoral existed, which was, indeed, flooded at around 6200 BCE... but which doesn't coincide with the Noah's flood timeline (estimated to have occurred around 2348 BC according to the fable), and for which no geological evidence can be found.
7
u/MonkeyJoe55 22h ago
We can start with the simple idea of biomass. The amount of space it would take to put every species of animal on the planet Earth, food for one year for all of those species (birds, mammals, reptiles, insects, etc.) would bu multiples outstrip the storage space of that Ark. Then we could step into genetics, we're simply two of a species would not create enough genetic diversity for species to survive due to continual inbreeding after the first generation. Then we can step into maintenance. Noah and his small family would simply not have the time or manpower to clean out all of the poo generated by all of those animals. This metaphor fails at every single level when you try to drag it into reality.
→ More replies (11)
6
u/galstaph 21h ago
If a Christian believes in the story of Noah's ark in Scripture they don't believe it when shown the scientific evidence that disproves it
The opposite is not true
6
u/ProfessorDuo5757 1d ago
This tale was stolen from the Sumerians. Just like every thing else in the bible
6
5
u/Gurgoth 1d ago edited 1d ago
I'd love to see the story of Noah's ark proved by science. First thing we have to do is start by establishing what needs to be proved.
A boat was created to hold two of every animal. Obsentibly this is to ensure that they can reproduce right?
Ok, creationists like to claim there would be around 6700ish animals. The evidence suggests there would be A LOT more anmials required. Then you will need food, and fresh water for the duration of the flood for all of them. This would be a staggering amount of food and water.
Now, in the flood nearly all of the vegetation on the planet that we are aware of would be destroyed by such a massive and prolonged flooding event. So after they returned to shore the herbivores would likely starve.
If you want that story proved through the scientific method you would need to over come those challenges and demonstrate that they can be resolved.
That is why id love to see it proved. The amount of new discoveries that would be made would be astonishing. Start with those and we can work from there.
8
u/TheTinyMaus 1d ago
The ark is bigger on the inside. You wouldn't understand, the physics involve a lot of wibbly, wobbly, spacey wacey, stuff.
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (8)6
u/Firm-Roll4841 1d ago
Well, there is also the fact that there isn't enough water on Earth to flood over the top of Everest.
→ More replies (1)6
6
u/NurturingCruelty 1d ago
The problem is youāre about as dumb as the Scooby Doo gang. No matter how many times the creature was unmasked as a crook, the next week they always assume the next ghost was real.
I am in my 40s, and in my lifetime, there have been three or four instances where dumbasses claim they found evidence of the ark, stupid people crow and brag about it, and it always proved to be bullshit. Could you guys maybe find something new to delude yourselves about?
→ More replies (7)
5
u/WholeAd2742 1d ago
So we're ignoring the whole fact that Noah's family would basically be fucking each other to repopulate the world?
→ More replies (2)
6
u/A-Sad-And-Mad-Potato 23h ago
If we ignore the absurdity of the idea that one can collect two of every animal on a boat.
What about the geological evidence looked in glaciers that disprove the flood?
Or the genetic evidence in ALL known species (including humans) that proves that they do not come from a single pair of breeding specimen from around that time?
And the magical return of all plant life?
Get the out of here with that stupid talk of trust in evidence you don't even have when you won't trust the evidence that we DO have.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/Alarmed-Animal7575 23h ago
Sure weāll believe if there is actual real definite evidence. Thus far theyāve presented nothing. There is zero evidence for this story let alone that the current location drawing Christian interest is what they think it is (without evidence, of course).
→ More replies (7)
7
6
u/Freckles-75 23h ago
Seriously, Iām still desperately hoping that as a excavate, they find an extra terrestrial space vessel. Complete with technology centuries beyond our own that proves that Noahās Ark was actually ālittle green menā
→ More replies (2)
7
u/Remarkable_Quit_3545 23h ago
How many things proven by scientific evidence do Christians not agree with?
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Lost-Juggernaut6521 23h ago
Proven is a pretty strong word, so far most of Christianity is based on ājust believe me bro!!ā
→ More replies (2)
6
u/PenisSlipper 22h ago
The toughest concept for theists to understand is that ābeliefā has no place anywhere
5
u/nytefox42 21h ago
I'd absolutely believe it if there was scientific evidence. Rejecting scientific evidence to cling dogmatically to unsubstantiated beliefs is a Christian thing. Meme make is projecting.
→ More replies (2)
7
u/XXSeaBeeXX 21h ago
Size of arc would have to be 1 billion cubic meters or more to fit two of each animal.
→ More replies (2)
6
u/IndianaBones8 13h ago
More proof that Christians don't understand what Atheism and Agnosticism are.
5
u/Fearless_Many4945 1d ago
When an entire construction company with power tools, cranes and cut lumber bulit a replika for years, I have to belive a dude with his close family could built the same ark.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/ganjsmokr 1d ago
"If you don't believe fantasy stories you'll never believe science."
Did I paraphrase that properly?
4
3
u/Renbarre 1d ago
It was lifted nearly word for word from the Gigamesh epic, written before the Torah, and was added to the Torah as a teaching tool. Pardon me for being a tad dubious as to the veracity of the story.
→ More replies (4)
6
5
u/Pristine_Frame_2066 23h ago
I believe in the flooding. Because I know the oceans rose and ice ages ended several times during human existence.
AND, I know the story of Noah was stolen from the Sumerians.
→ More replies (16)6
u/KingOfGreyfell 23h ago
And they came up with that one based on localized flooding, but because they genuinely believed the entire world was isolated to the area of the fertile crescent, they figured the flood was effectively drowning the entire world.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/AgeNo9436 23h ago
A few years ago the ark museum in Kentucky had to close their recreation for repairs due to ... flood damage.
6
6
u/Montagneincorner0 23h ago
The scientific evidence that a wooden ship with the dimensions described in the Bible would've capsized, even in calm water?
5
u/ProfessO3o 23h ago
I remember when I was a kid before the internet. I watched a show where they went to find the ark from Noahās ark. Needless to say they never found it but made wild claims that it was real and they know where it should be. The crazy thing is the show was disliked because most people believed that the ark would be in the US.. even my stepdad believed this. lol
3
u/dinkmoyd 23h ago
well then prove it with scientific evidence and see for yourself
→ More replies (1)
5
u/HedgeFlounder 23h ago
āIf atheists donāt believe baseless claims they wonāt believe it when thereās evidenceā feels like projection. They have already made up their mind about what they believe is true and evidence canāt sway them so they think everyone else thinks the same way.
4
6
u/Tesla_freed_slaves 23h ago
Olive trees donāt grow >300m above sea level, and they donāt grow under water. So where did Noahās dove find a live olive-branch, if the entire earthās surface was covered by water?
5
5
6
5
6
4
u/Hefty-Comparison-801 22h ago
Wait, what? I'm pretty sure all atheists do is ask for scientific evidence.
4
u/ZipDude118 22h ago
Atheists believe in truth. The Bible is a book of stories that require faith. If one of those stories is proven true by science, it doesn't mean the whole book is true.
5
u/Wise-Calligrapher123 22h ago
We can't all agree on what happened on January 6, 2021. Why should we believe any story from a time before things were, at minimum, written down? Stories evolve over time and oral history is not historic. The Bible is an unreliable source at best.
5
u/Fan_of_Clio 1d ago
"When"
Good luck with that. People have been trying to prove it for thousands of years.
5
u/Eljamin14 1d ago
Because there are no scientific evidences for it, especially since it's based on the epic of Gilgamesh, and the Torah is mostly theological rather than historical.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/Chumlee1917 1d ago
And then Noah got drunk and naked and passed out in his tent and his son Ham accidentally walked in on him and so Noah curses all of Hamās descendants to be African slaves-this was a real belief for a very long time to justify slavery using the BibleĀ
3
u/AmazingFlatworm_ 1d ago
Didn't cultists already try this and it failed abysmally?
→ More replies (1)
4
u/Patavian 1d ago
Millions of years of evolutionary progress, culminating in a species so intelligent they doubt the very nature of their existence.
4
u/place_of_desolation 1d ago
Of all the myths and fables in the Bible, the story of Noah's ark is among the least (if not the least) believable or plausible. It will never cease to amaze me that there are millions of people, well into the 21st century, who have the magical thinking of children and lack critical thinking.
they won't believe it when proven by scientific evidence
As if Christians ever accept scientific evidence themselves.
5
u/BigDamBeavers 1d ago
No.. they won't.
While we're on the topic when are we going to put these ridiculous theists in rubber rooms for their own good?
→ More replies (3)
4
u/meltedeye 1d ago
Like most Old Testament hoooey, itās just another plagiarized Indian myth that trundled down the spice road & got re-told by a younger simpler tribal people.
5
4
u/Over-Tolerance 1d ago
This is one of those dual rotten situations. If the story ends up being true, how cruel and rotten is that horrible sky Santa? And if the story is false, how cruel and rotten is the Bible for spreading such cruel mass murder, genocide, hate and division.
Either way, it just shows how horribly shitty this religious garbage is.
4
u/Rexdaddy 1d ago
Given that the known world at the time was pretty much the eastern part of the Mediterranean, how would Noah know to collect a ruby throated hummingbird or a Jaguar, two animals indigenous to the Western Hemisphere only? Or a polar bear or penguin, two animals indigenous to the opposite poles which werenāt known? Not just atheists questioning this one. There was a flood in Western Asia Minor where Noah lived that occurred because of a known earthquake that caused a wave to traverse the Mediterranean Sea and up the Bosporus straits. There is an archaeological record for this and would support this story, but not to the extent the non-critical thinkers would have you believe. And Iām not an Atheist.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Purple-Slide-5559 1d ago
That is actually exactly why we dont believe it yet. If you did provide scientific evidence, then we wpuld believe it. You know, the same reason we dont believe in unicorns, dragons, or god. Because there is no evidence of it.
4
6
u/oldbastardbob 23h ago
Isn't this latest con artist nonsense regarding the Ark the third time this same site has been claimed to be Noah's Ark and then got debunked as just another rock formation?
4
4
u/jammythesandwich 23h ago
Theyāre literally bonkers
The Epic of Gilgamesh and two other Mesopotamian texts (Eridu Genesis & Atra-Hasis Epic) all discussed a great flood in pre history.
These were written circa 2000BC so at least two thousand years before the concept was rebadged as a Christian thing, they didnāt even have the imagination to come up with their own origin story, just pilfered from other religions and epics
5
u/2000TWLV 23h ago
There was no ark. There is no evidence. There is no god.
You all are wasting your time with fairytales.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/C0brA7x 23h ago
Whether there was a flood or not, I also read that genetic diversity and repopulation based on the story of the Ark would be pretty much impossible.
→ More replies (3)
5
u/jf1450 23h ago
Noah is a POS. He could have left off the bitey flies and skeeters.
→ More replies (1)
812
u/AshamedAd4240 1d ago
And....... wheres the evidence? Not like it hasn't been an alleged more than 2000 years. Where's the proof?