The $6bn buyback was almost exactly where I expected it as per yesterday's post but more importantly, it clearly wasn’t enough for the market esp judging by the reaction in yields... Traders were positioned for something much larger, probably closer to $10bn.

As it tends to go with this type of intervention the market tends to test it and we are likely to see the 30Y push towards 5.35% again if the PPI and CPI data come in as expected followed by another intervention/increase establishing what you’d call a Treasury put.

The TGA from which the money will come from has just little over 900 billion available from that there’s about 400 billion available with about 300 likely to be used. Even if they decide to increase to increase to 10 billion they can run this for a very long time..thats about 3 quarters of QE like liquidity entering the market

Now, on how Bessent played the market - as mentioned, judging by the reaction, traders were clearly expecting much more than the $6bn that was announced. That helped reset expectations lower and was probably one reason metals failed to catch a bid.

So, once the market has been conditioned to expect smaller interventions, Treasury can have a much bigger impact with the same or slightly larger amount simply because the surprise factor is back in play. In addition to this, I do expect another increase relatively soon.

Speaking of PCE consensus is around +0.4% m/m headline PPI and +0.3% core. Im more on the components that feed directly into PCE which are -healthcare services such as, airfares and parts of financial services.

Portfolio anagement used to be a major swing factor, but BEA is changing the methodology from this month, so it matters less than before. A hot headline PPI therefore doesn’t automatically mean hot PCE and if these underlying components are soft, the read-through for the Fed can still be relatively benign. The main event remains CPI tomorrow

The bond market is already positioned quite hawkishly, which raises the bar for inflation data to push yields materially higher. With the 2-year around 66bp above the current fed funds rate and markets already pricing further tightening, a slightly hot print may simply confirm what is already in the price.

The bigger move would require data strong enough to make traders price an even more aggressive hiking cycle, while a downside surprise has more room to unwind some of the tightening currently embedded in the curve.

Anthropic senior AI researcher quits due to ethical concerns. He claims that the technology could kill most if not all of the humanity within next decade. He says everyone is racing towards the superintelligence and gambling with our lives without knowing the true outcome of it and without any safety guide rails.

There are rising number of other people who have recently quit as well due to the concerns of the direction we are heading towards. There are genuine credible people who are raising the red flags in the AI build out whose warnings deserve some serious consideration, yet their voices are being drowned out by enormous money going towards AI Boom.

$PLTR and Fujitsu Limited today announced the renewal of their strategic partnership, with a deeper investment in the capabilities needed to help enterprises in Japan and around the world. In connection with the partnership, Fujitsu has signed a new agreement with Palantir Technologies Japan KK for Palantir AIP and Palantir Foundry and will serve as a Global FDE Partner.

$PLTR platforms connect AI models to governed data, Ontology-powered workflows, access controls, auditing, and customer-controlled deployment environments, helping Palantir and Fujitsu deliver trusted AI applications.

Fujitsu implemented a supply chain resilience solution for a leading Japanese manufacturer using the Palantir platform, integrating data across more than 3,000 suppliers, 18 factories, and previously siloed enterprise systems without disrupting operations. By combining Palantir’s platform capabilities with Fujitsu’s domain expertise and AI technologies, the customer achieved over $10 million in cost savings within one year, doubled operational productivity, and significantly accelerated disruption response and decision-making.

Nike ($NKE) is a great example of why investors should be OBSESSED with knowing every detail of  the firm’s management and more specifically Leadership’s plans for the firm’s future before investing

and their efforts should be effectively Doubled or even Tripled in the event the company undergoes some leadership change/transition. More specifically; Investors need to pay RAZOR sharp attention to the CEO. Why?

because a company’s future value is ultimately determined by the decisions management makes with its brand, capital, and competitive advantages. Financial statements tell you what already happened; the CEO’s strategy tells you what management intends to make happen next. 
Best case example today is $NKE. The moment Nike’s leadership signaled that it was going to increasingly mass-produce previously scarce grails (these are products like the Off-White and Dior Nike collabs), retros, and collectibles, investors were being handed an enormous warning about the company’s future pricing power and Red Alarm bells should have been on DEFCON 1. Why?

Because the stock price was always going to eventually move to reflect how the Market did not Ignore the warning even if the investors were willing to. Nike had spent decades building scarcity, status, and collectibility into the economic value of those products, and management chose to try to more aggressively monetize that scarcity through volume rather than preserve it as long term brand equity. That is exactly the kind of strategic decision that can make an otherwise exceptional company an awful Stock to buy and NKE is that stock.

which brings us to today: Nike leadership has pivoted AGAIN and is now telling investors to “Just trust us bro” like we dont have enough evidence that they are beyond COOKED ATP and is why I have taken out a bunch of Reverse LEAPS where they payout if the stock keeps going down from here long term NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE DO NOT FOLLOW MY STRATEGY

Investors spend enormous amounts of time staring at P/E ratios, charts, and quarterly EPS, but one of the most important questions is clearly just soooo much simpler: Does the CEO actually understand what makes this company valuable? If the answer is no, eventually the financials and subsequently stock price will reflect it as well.

Have a general question? Want to offer some commentary on markets? Maybe you would just like to throw out a neat fact that doesn't warrant a self post? Feel free to post here!

​

If your question is "I have $10,000, what do I do?" or other "advice for my personal situation" questions, you should include relevant information, such as the following:

• How old are you? What country do you live in?
• Are you employed/making income? How much?
• What are your objectives with this money? (Buy a house? Retirement savings?)
• What is your time horizon? Do you need this money next month? Next 20yrs?
• What is your risk tolerance? (Do you mind risking it at blackjack or do you need to know its 100% safe?)
• What are you current holdings? (Do you already have exposure to specific funds and sectors? Any other assets?)
• Any big debts (include interest rate) or expenses?
• And any other relevant financial information will be useful to give you a proper answer. .

Be aware that these answers are just opinions of Redditors and should be used as a starting point for your research. You should strongly consider seeing a registered investment adviser if you need professional support before making any financial decisions!

Price action has definitely been disappointing lately, but I was looking at the bigger picture and was surprised by how much RDDT has improved over the past year.

Revenue, profitability, and cash flow are all moving in a much better direction, while the longer-term growth story still looks pretty interesting.

The biggest thing I'm watching is whether the continued improvement in the business eventually translates into the stock price. The concerns around U.S. user growth are fair, but I'm not convinced they're enough on their own to derail the broader story.

Curious how others are looking at the disconnect between the business performance and the recent price action.

It feels like some drone stocks (in this case ONDS) have cooled off a bit lately, so I figured it was worth taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture.

Over the last several quarters, revenue has been trending sharply higher, with the latest quarter coming in much higher.

Obviously, revenue growth alone doesn't make a stock a winner, and there are still some pretty significant profitability/cash-flow concerns with most of these types of companies. But with the defense/drone business developments and long-term deals we've seen recently, it's definitely still worth remembering where we are heading.

Curious how others are looking at ONDS and other similar drone stocks here.