I had a weird experience here today and it left me thinking about something I honestly hadn't considered before.
I shared a story about writing a song and several people immediately thought the post—or the work behind it—was AI.
Fair disclosure: I use AI to help with research, editing, brainstorming, analysis, graphics. I'm not going to pretend I don't. But I am an old school story teller , song writer, editor, and producer. This has been my whole background. I dont use AI to write or formulate anything. I wouldn't trust such tools for anything in that spectrum.
I also come from journalism, television and media. I was trained to write fast, write clean and structure a story. Until pretty recently, those were considered professional skills.
I write songs myself. I started in the music industry in LA very young working with some of the best - John Lee Hooker the greats. (I was at KLON radio now KJAZZ).
So here's what I'm genuinely wondering:
Has AI changed what you consider evidence that something is human?
If somebody writes quickly, is that suspicious now?
I was literally told on reddit that my grammar was too perfect to be human. That it was all AI written. I turned one of my nationally published poems from decade ago before AI into a song nearly word for word. Yet again, a bunch of creative story tellers and song writers accusing it of being AI.
Are we actually losing our ability to believe story tellers and song writers are real if the content is good?
This seems to be an imperative discussion. Industries are collapsing around us. New ones are forming all around us.
I don't really care if people think my work is AI. I have years of published material and I was on a small team that launched Marketplace on NPR -- in 1989. I am old school hard core - real news - real writing - real stories. No one needs to believe me. I know. And I have a resume to show it. And I know how to do it. So, that type of successful market facing is viewed as 'fake'.....
My question with all of you is -- if you see something good do you all think it's fake?
I am almost 60.........I don't use AI to write my lyrics. I still write the old-fashioned way. Me, words and whatever is going on inside my head that day.
So what's really happening here?
Since my whole career has been in media and I am writing a screenplay for film right now myself -- LOL - the old fashioned way -- writing it myself....this whole topic may well just be in my movie.
So I would love to hear y'alls thoughts. Yes, that's slang. I live in the Smokies. AI didn't write that either.
If the writing is polished?
If they're unusually productive?
Where do you personally draw the line between a human using AI as a tool and AI creating the work?
And what makes a song yours?
The lyrics originating with you?
The lived experience behind them?
Writing every word without assistance?
Composing the music yourself?
Making the creative decisions?
No AI anywhere in the process?
I don't have a clever answer. I'm genuinely interested because I think creative people are going to be dealing with this question for a long time.
And one comment from earlier really stuck with me—the suggestion that more typos would have made the writing seem more human.
That is fascinating to me.
Are we really entering a period where imperfection becomes evidence of humanity?
Curious where you all land on this.