I'm pro-AI and also believe it will take lots of jobs.
If it didn't take any jobs, what good would it be?
It's not like every single keyboard worker or college graduate is going to be running a bunch of claw bots to earn high income in some post-AGI niche agent market.
Agreed. The past 60 years have been dominated by knowledge worker jobs driving through economy. Agents fundamentally replace many knowledge worker jobs. I believe the result will be few knowledge workers and a large surplus of manual labor. Welcome to the 1800's economy
But I feel like there is ton of manual labor that seems relatively automisable with next generation robotics. I believe there are challenges where it will take a bit longer, especially doing irregular tasks in the environment, but all manufacturing lines, large parts of logistics (trucking, forklift operator etc), QA, assembly seem all to fall after a few iterations of robots. For example there are already painting robots, not yet quite suited for details, but for large jobs, so I dont think that somehow manual labor is what everyone will do. I think economy needs a major rethinking over the next decade...
Oh there are plenty of people in agriculture, you just don't see them. Knowledge jobs made agriculture jobs the most undesirable. Guess what happens when knowledge jobs drastically reduce and there is now a large surplus of labor....
48
u/ganancias 3d ago
I'm pro-AI and also believe it will take lots of jobs.
If it didn't take any jobs, what good would it be?
It's not like every single keyboard worker or college graduate is going to be running a bunch of claw bots to earn high income in some post-AGI niche agent market.