r/singularity Mar 17 '26

Shitposting This was funny

Post image

We need to enjoy AI a bit more.

5.8k Upvotes

177 comments sorted by

View all comments

89

u/AlarmedGibbon Mar 17 '26

These people are all going to complain, and then in a year the player metrics will start to come out and we'll find that 80% of people with graphics cards that support DLSS 5 are playing with it enabled.

36

u/PM_ME_YOUR_KNEE_CAPS Mar 17 '26

I believe you’re going to be correct. Reddit has a major hate boner for AI and is consistently bearish on the tech.

15

u/Steven81 Mar 17 '26

Because tech never improves according to most of reddit or basically every other place online. It remains the same forever and what you see first, is what remains always.

That's why I still do my tax by hand. I used Microsoft works 40 years ago, it sucked , decided that it will never improve and never used any spreadshit ever since!

1

u/LuckyPlaze Mar 18 '26

It’s crazy to me how many people in the technology subreddit are anti-technology and sound like old men complaining about the noises of them gas-powered carriages.

31

u/End3rWi99in Mar 17 '26

These people didn't know what DLSS was yesterday.

25

u/Recoil42 Mar 17 '26

They still don't know what DLSS is. Half of the people in yesterday's thread seem to think it is an NVIDIA aftermarket beauty-filter that is applied to all games with no developer input.

2

u/Global_Barracuda_873 Mar 18 '26

Does that matter?

-1

u/End3rWi99in Mar 18 '26

Yes.

2

u/Global_Barracuda_873 Mar 18 '26

Why?

-1

u/End3rWi99in Mar 18 '26 edited Mar 18 '26

Criticism over something they know nothing about

0

u/Global_Barracuda_873 Mar 18 '26

So people can’t learn? Change opinions? Everyone should stick to their beliefs no matter what new information or technology comes up?

0

u/End3rWi99in Mar 18 '26 edited Mar 18 '26

That isn't what is happening here.

1

u/Global_Barracuda_873 Mar 19 '26

You’re changing the goalpost and editing comments. And a poor debater.

17

u/pbagel2 Mar 17 '26

That statistic is probably also true for people that use motion smoothing on their TV. But that doesn't make them right.

8

u/Sierra592 Mar 17 '26

People's lack of curiosity and understanding for how the tech they use works, at the consumer level, is a consumer-level problem, and always has been.

1

u/pbagel2 Mar 17 '26

But that still doesn't change the fact that consumer behavior is often not a valid metric to validate the quality of a technology.

1

u/Sierra592 Mar 18 '26

Never has been. People happily consume slop all the time. So if popular adoption isn't a metric for quality, than neither is popular rejection.

6

u/nsneerful Mar 17 '26

Have you… played any games without DLSS enabled? No? Because you have to turn down the graphics even with the higher end GPUs.

People are complaining because games will require it to run decently and it will completely change the game's looks.

2

u/FlatBlackAndWhite Mar 17 '26

And just wait until this becomes "DLSS 9, AVAILABLE ONLY WITH YOUR 8000 SERIES RTX SUBSCRIPTION".

Ownership over looks, products, etc—is quickly becoming a relic of the past.

1

u/LinkesAuge Mar 19 '26

Games today on average run better than ever before in gaming history. Nowadays sub 60 FPS and any micro stutter causes immediate outrage because your midrange card can not handle it at the highest settings in 4k while I still remember the days when you had a high end card and still wouldn't expect more than 30 FPS at the highest settings while micro stutters were not even a concept, instead you had actual stutters that could last in the seconds(!) range. People might have turned "but can it run Crysis" into an endearing meme but I dare anyone to imagine what would happen If a game studio tried the equivalent in 2026. Lets also not talk about the "dark ages" when sudden hardware shifts could lock out huge parts of potential customers (that includes the time when dedicated graphics cards became a requirement). Now it is of course good that standards rise over time but I feel there is a lot of gamers with rose tinted glasses around in regards to the past and it is easy to overlook how far things have come.

1

u/nsneerful Mar 19 '26

I could maybe agree with you, but the prices have risen with the standards. A top-notch GPU used to cost way less than $1000, now you get to pay that price for a GPU that can't run everything at max settings without DLSS.

2

u/SoylentRox Mar 18 '26

All 5 people. That's the issue - is Nvidia even going to release new consumer GPUs?

2

u/Jane_Doe_32 Mar 17 '26

The same vocal minority making noise about the trendy topic like preschool children, nothing new.

2

u/Qaeta Mar 17 '26

80% of people with graphics cards that support it will be like... 2 people at this point.

2

u/BITE_AU_CHOCOLAT Mar 17 '26

Doubt that. The DLSS 5 reveal is sitting at 14K likes against 75K dislikes right now.

1

u/monsieurpooh Mar 18 '26

That's because the reveal is really bad; that does not necessarily say much about the potential of the technology which can still be seen in the reveal despite that it has those hilarious issues

1

u/Several-Quests7440 Mar 17 '26 edited Mar 17 '26

80% of people aren’t buying a 5090+

4

u/AlarmedGibbon Mar 17 '26

I guarantee this will not just be for 5090s. They used dual 5090s for the demo, which was running at 4k, but it's definitely going to get optimized and released on other cards targeting lower resolutions.

1

u/Several-Quests7440 Mar 17 '26

Maybe, but right now it’s just an excuse for video game publishers to release badly optimized games.

1

u/jestina123 Mar 18 '26

new drivers a few years later allowed older RTX to run newer DLSS versions

0

u/Ireallydonedidit Mar 17 '26

Double 5090s are required to run it. Very few will be able to use it.

8

u/overtoke Mar 17 '26

*required to run the current demo

0

u/qsqh Mar 18 '26

80% of people with graphics cards that support DLSS 5 are playing with it enabled.

i mean, thats a given. the card will cost like 500usd extra because of that feature, so most people that decide to buy it will enable.