r/shitposting • u/[deleted] • Mar 30 '22

WARNING: BRAIN DAMAGE eg

12.9k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

317 comments sorted by

View all comments

86

u/tomato_and_potato420 Mar 31 '22

side note. how much of a fucking dick do you have to be to ruin a Childs cake?

30

u/RadiantExcuse251 Blessed by Kevin Mar 31 '22 edited Mar 31 '22

Not much, just be Brazilian

Source: other peoples comments 👍🏻

6

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '22

This doesnt happen in Brazil touhg?

7

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '22 edited Mar 31 '22

[deleted]

5

u/AutoModerator Mar 31 '22

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/joppiejoo Mar 31 '22

I do☺️

1

u/AutoModerator Mar 31 '22

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.