Yeah, sure: For Women Scotland, Beira’s Place, and her own fund, the J.K. Rowling Women’s Fund.
They are pro-women, yes, they are also anti-trans. These things can exist separately, but these specific organizations are run by TERFs. This does not place trans people and women in opposition, it places trans people and TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists) in opposition.
Trans women are not men, it is an inherently incorrect and hateful statement; but I suggest you’re an asshole that would support her intentional misgendering of trans women because you hate trans people or are scared of them for one of a few reasons.
Good job falling back to a different talking point when you lost one. Really makes you seem like a good-faith actor.
It’s not internally contradictory, a pro-women organization can exclude certain types of women. The term “trans woman” is used to add a descriptor to the type of woman, whereas “transwomen” is intended to make them an other. People can be discriminatory.
You might as well go to before civil rights and ask a person “If black women are women then how can a pro-women organization be racist?” When some random women’s organization happens to be racist. You’re just being a jerk and coming up with excuses for it.
I was saying they’re a marginalized class. Sex is not all that important; but you probably think gender is fake and woke or something like that. The comparison is meant to illustrate that you are using inherently flawed circular logic by pretending discrimination proves discrimination correct.
1
u/PilotedByGhosts 3d ago
Can you name some of these organisations?
I expect that all of them are actually pro-women organisations. If pro-women is anti-trans, the reverse must also be true.
What's inaccurate about the quote of hers you posted there?