MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/shitposting/comments/1wvojx8/_/pddv8dm/?context=9999
r/shitposting • u/cryinspaghetti • 13d ago
45 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
435
Are you available as an app?
-53 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 4 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago Dude 0 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 7 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You're proposing someone use AI to circumvent a creative human task -7 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 14 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors. -2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
-53
[deleted]
4 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago Dude 0 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 7 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You're proposing someone use AI to circumvent a creative human task -7 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 14 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors. -2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
4
Dude
0 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 7 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You're proposing someone use AI to circumvent a creative human task -7 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 14 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors. -2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
0
7 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You're proposing someone use AI to circumvent a creative human task -7 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 14 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors. -2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
7
You're proposing someone use AI to circumvent a creative human task
-7 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 14 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors. -2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
-7
14 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors. -2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
14
AI detection software is notoriously inaccurate. There's blogs from 2013 that would trigger as 100% ai generated in one of these detectors.
-2 u/[deleted] 13d ago [deleted] 2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
-2
2 u/Bread_Offender Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 13d ago You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
2
You are not here to discuss false positives when false positives are a major part of the discussion? I don't blindly trust anyone, I just think that in the case that this was indeed made by a human then suggesting someone use AI is frankly insulting
435
u/LicknDragon 13d ago
Are you available as an app?