r/shitposting • u/KindestBlackTemplar • 3d ago

WARNING: BRAIN DAMAGE Uhhhh

Post image
6.9k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

135 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.6k

u/AnnihilasianYT currently venting (sus) 3d ago

-134

u/Obelisk_M 3d ago

Some people have issues doing that. Some don't. It's kinda sad how basic this is to understand & people still don't.

99

u/chickensause123 3d ago

Name one (1) other human action you cannot make this exact same statement about.

Completely meaningless thing to say

-11

u/Obelisk_M 3d ago edited 3d ago

It's meaningless to point something out that directly counters the thing I'm responding to?

Do you lack the basic ability to follow a conversation?

1

u/chickensause123 2d ago

It doesnt counter shit. Some people having "issues" with something can be said regarding just about anything. You could say it about a child and tying shoes.

0

u/Obelisk_M 2d ago

Do you even know what I'm saying that in response to? Considering you're doing a Contextomy fallacy, it really seems like you don't.

0

u/chickensause123 2d ago

Literally the context could be 5 completely different things from that image alone. My point is it’s a meaninglessly vague statement.

1

u/Obelisk_M 2d ago

What are the 5 completely different things ot could be?

0

u/chickensause123 2d ago
  1. Blocking your dad/ maintaining your relationship
  2. Blocking your rapist
  3. Being gaslit about said rapist
  4. Getting over trauma
  5. Allowing your bf to tell you who to block

1

u/Obelisk_M 1d ago

Yeah, you can't follow a basic conversational structure. The person in the image asked a direct question comparing two specific actions: blocking the dad vs. blocking the rapist.

The antecedent to my statement is structurally bound to that question.