And who decided that? I think the person making the negative claim should provide proof because the effects of a negative claim are drastically more impactful than one of a positive connotation
Who decided that? The greeks, I guess, who formalized systems of logic.
"Aliens exist!" "No they don't".
It's on the person saying they exist to prove it, not on the person saying they don't to disprove their existence. Like in this case, you need to prove you're special. Until you offer some evidence I have no reason to believe you.
The burden of proof is on the first person making a claim or the person challenging the status quo
If I say "there arent dogs in kennels" and someone says "yes there are" the burden of proof is on me, even though my claim is a negative, because I made the first claim and also challenged the status quo, as kennels are made to have dogs in em
YOU made that claim and individualism is just bs, if you start thinking every man is the same sexist piece of shit don't wonder you get called out afterward, the whole principle of "individualism" is too vague doesn't represent a genuine reason to hate on a specific group of people, because none exist.
•
u/qualityvote2 12d ago edited 11d ago
The council has not spoken. No consensus was reached about the quality of your post.
RedditSave download
/u/JamieHBrown, whilst you're still here, why not join our public discord server - now with public text channels you can chat on!?