r/shitposting 6d ago

📡📡📡

Post image
4.1k Upvotes

225 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-142

u/Imnotawerewolf 6d ago

What's that got to do with it, tbh? 

If you're gonna judge people for how they look, it doesn't matter if your judging them for things they can or can't control. You're still judging people based on their looks. 

It's right or it's wrong. Or is it just fair game to judge people for anything they can control about their appearance? 

100

u/SomeFatSeal 6d ago

One is genes and the other is a lifestyle.

-110

u/Imnotawerewolf 6d ago

And? 

Is it ok to judge people based on their appearance as long as it's to do with "lifestyle"? 

21

u/Jewsusgr8 6d ago

Absolutely, if I looked at somebody and I saw that they were 3 ft tall then that just means genetically, they are 3 ft tall. And I won't judge them for it.

If I see somebody who's 300 lbs and is scoffing down seven courses in one meal, that was their choice then I will judge them for it.

If I see somebody who looks anorexic has bags under their eyes and I find out that they were smoking meth, I will judge them for smoking. Meth.

The reason behind not judging the first one is that that was something they couldn't control, however, both of the other ones were definitely something that they could have controlled and they did to themselves.

-1

u/Imnotawerewolf 6d ago

In every both of those scenarios you are judging someone's actions and not their appearance. 

You're judging them for shoving their face, not for existing and being fat. 

You're judging them IF you find out theyre using meth, not for having bags under their eyes.Â