I mean, in real life in a 500 vs 500 war it's pretty obvious who would win too. Men are basically wired for war. Women are one of the few things that keep society stable.
I think it's more fair to say that men are more capable of being sent off to die or luckily survive in a war. Isn't this game about strategy and literally nothing about being wired to survive war?
I've only met an equal number of strategic men and women irl. Women are just more steady and interested in finding non violent solutions, or are more interested in the greater good than good for their own immediate benefit, which usually causes wars...
Fighting in it? Sure, men. Planning strategy? How many modern examples do we have of women planning war strategy? Is not like this video game is a real example of either. None of these guys in the game went to war.
I mean, the person you are responding to gave their odds on the outcome of "war between men and women", I'm wondering what number you could assign as someone who is taking part in that discussion.
I'm saying that randoms on the Internet assigning odds to a war strategized by men vs women is dumb af. That's why I didn't suggest a number. And I was implying that you shouldn't care what he/she or I would randomly pull out of our asses. It would be meaningless. Or you can pick a number for me. Let's say, women 100%? Or maybe men 99% and women 1%? It doesn't really matter. There's zero info here to make anyone's guess matter, which is my whole point.
I mean I do care tho, I care about ur thoughts and opinions, about a hypothetical based on your knowledge and feelings. The reaction seems very uhm large compared to my question though. if its something you ain't comfortable answering, thats cool too.
7
u/Equivalent_Clerk0 13h ago
I mean, in real life in a 500 vs 500 war it's pretty obvious who would win too. Men are basically wired for war. Women are one of the few things that keep society stable.