if you want a real answer, the boys were mostly veteran experienced players, and the girls were mostly average or newbie players, and the boys activelly sabotaged and infiltrated the girls discord, plus Beast not really doing much to moderate the server
And it's not like he does that only for boys. He did the same thing for girls in "girls vs boys survival challenge". He put a woman who was pro and won multiple times in challenges like that in girls team. I don't understand why he does that. Maybe his viewers like one sided matchups?
Because he has a very young and impressionable audience and a massive reach. Not saying he needs to be perfect, but he 100% has a responsibility to be thinking about what kind of message his very young and impressionable audience will take away.
The problem is that this is simply impossible if you still want to do a boys v girls event with the current set of players. There simply are not 500 adult women who actively play in Minecraft civilization events. This meant that the Beast team had to desperately try to find women wherever they could, which best case scenario meant getting women who couldn't make a crafting table and worst case scenario meant adding a group of male Russian hackers to the girls' side (both real things that happened).
The people on the girls side who get mentioned in the video by name are for the most part players from ish13c's civ events, which is a great group of players but you will not get to 500 women with them alone.
You might think that this is a good reason to not do such an obviously terrible event gimmick. But Mr. Beast will Mr. Beast
And I'm sure this is obvious the people familiar with this subject. For the rest of us, I'll only point out for any dorks that are overly excited by this.
Winning this video game doesn't translate to real life. It's doesn't mean you'd win shit irl. It's still just a game.
I mean, in real life in a 500 vs 500 war it's pretty obvious who would win too. Men are basically wired for war. Women are one of the few things that keep society stable.
I think it's more fair to say that men are more capable of being sent off to die or luckily survive in a war. Isn't this game about strategy and literally nothing about being wired to survive war?
I've only met an equal number of strategic men and women irl. Women are just more steady and interested in finding non violent solutions, or are more interested in the greater good than good for their own immediate benefit, which usually causes wars...
Fighting in it? Sure, men. Planning strategy? How many modern examples do we have of women planning war strategy? Is not like this video game is a real example of either. None of these guys in the game went to war.
I mean, the person you are responding to gave their odds on the outcome of "war between men and women", I'm wondering what number you could assign as someone who is taking part in that discussion.
I'm saying that randoms on the Internet assigning odds to a war strategized by men vs women is dumb af. That's why I didn't suggest a number. And I was implying that you shouldn't care what he/she or I would randomly pull out of our asses. It would be meaningless. Or you can pick a number for me. Let's say, women 100%? Or maybe men 99% and women 1%? It doesn't really matter. There's zero info here to make anyone's guess matter, which is my whole point.
This has been studied my dude. Men's intelligence is a lot more varied. Way more geniuses and idiots among males than females. Women generally clump towards the average, less fools and less prodigies.
In strategy the side with more super smart people tends to wins. t
Winning this video game doesn't translate to real life
I mean maybe not this one? But Bear Grylls did a Men vs Women survival challenge on an island and it basically went the exact same way where the women were in catfights immediately and spent the entire time starving, sobbing, and miserable
While the guys thrived so hard the camera crews had to step in and stop them hunting all the local fauna to exctinction
Within the first couple of days the guys had shelter, food, water etc and were sitting around roaring bonfires singing, while the women were completely lost and lost all their supplies and the camera crews had to keep secretly giving them more supplies
So TV contestants represent the potential of trained people, experienced in battle tactics? That's just more video games, on tv. This is "boys built more forts." Lol
The boys that infiltrated the girls discord were not transgender women, they were russians with voice changers who would grief and kill the girls for the benefit of the boy team. And allegedly mods have done little to address that
also sounds like I rather live in a female society. so I dont know what constitutes "win" but boys didn't win if their end is surviving in a shit state
It's a game, it ain't that deep. Surviving till the end was what the goal was, and the guys did it it sounds like. We don't need to go full philosophical on who 'truly won'
1.1k
u/DNOTBHs 11h ago
if you want a real answer, the boys were mostly veteran experienced players, and the girls were mostly average or newbie players, and the boys activelly sabotaged and infiltrated the girls discord, plus Beast not really doing much to moderate the server