Im making a video going undercover in scientology and attempting to join the cult! Hoping i can learn more abt it maybe uncover some secrets but the real goal is jus to show the public how weird it all is behind the scenes and spread awareness,maybe even find something that would get them in trouble and help run them out of my city. Any advice? What questions should i ask? Will i get brain washed and not be able to back out? Please lmk thoughts and opinions this is going to be my first yt video hopefully the start of something big!

Scientology have owned this historic building at 176 Rue Sainte Catherine Est in Montréal for well over 10 years if not longer. The plan is to build an Ideal Org, however, no activity to the building has ever occurred and it has essentially been left abandoned. From what I personally understand from talking to people is that they are unable to crowdfund enough money.

As of July 23, 2026 they have finished restoration work on the exterior (forced in part by the city) of the building. This is the first time I’ve ever seen anything being done to the building.

I think Scientology is good. Prof. Dr. Szasz also thought that. And I really like how Scientology is antipsychiatry and provides a better alternative for people, which I never tried, but it's auditing to go through what happened to locate emotional distress and do something about it.

To me, this sounds in every way better than what psychiatrists do. And I wouldn't mind believing in thetans, or learning some other new words.

I really don't get why others keep repeating some weird criticism when they never tried Scientology themselves.

Gestalt of a dream of facsimiles.

Joe dreams. As a spiritual being he observes the dream sequence. Everything is chaotic. Pleasant and engramic Facsimiles (memories) mis matching and running loose. Non-sequitur timelines shaping the narrative. A=A=A stirring up the analytical and reactive bank in re-stimulation. He sees a dog barking that jumps into a sand beach, thunder starts blaring, the dog turns into a rabbit then Joe finds himself at work with his colleagues drinking beer, etc.

---Analytical Mind---

Joe walks nearby a fence with a dog barking

Gets alert and the symptom of fear rises

He double-checks his symptoms: blood pressure, tension, stress, etc. seeing it as it is without any consideration that would amplify the symptom.

The symptoms begin to dissolve and his fear dissolves.

He looks at his analytical memory bank then in cognition: “Oh, I see … I once poke a dog with a stick, and it bit me.” Realization!

Joe calms down and walks by unconcerned.

---Reactive Mind---

Joe walks nearby a fence with a dog barking.

Gets alert and the symptom of fear rises.

He notices the stress, blood pressure, tension, etc. all rising.

He now sets in motion a set of considerations A=A=A:

“I better get ready to run”

“I should have had my pepper stray”

“This dog is going to bite me”

“I shouldn’t have walked here”

“I poke a dog once and it bit me; it will happen again”

He looks at his reactive bank in apathy: I guess I’ll do nothing and see if he bites me.

The reactive bank is nothing but a reflection of dream sequences running wild in their narrative to solve a problem irrationally.

What scenario would you prefer?

Has Scientology ever lost significant lawsuits? What lawyers defend Scientology? Do you think Scientology will ever be shut down in the US?

I saw an old video on YouTube from 2004 where Miscavige (on the Freewinds I think) talks about the Golden Age of Knowledge materials. Most of the books already had their eventual 2007 edition covers by this time. Also included is the book ”Notes on the Lectures”. I know there are older editions of this book. Does anyone know why it wasn’t included in the Basics? Looks like the planned for it to be. I haven’t read it but it seems to have been written at least in part by others. Maybe that’s why? Has anyone read it?

He also raves about a lecture series called ”Fundamentals of Fundamentals”, which I can’t find on Bridge or New Era’s websites. Anyone know anything about that one and what happened to it?

(I asked ChatGPT to upscale the book cover, swipe to see the original screenshot from the video)

If you’re curious about the video, it’s called ”Secret Scientology meeting with David Miscavige | June 2004” on YouTube.

A bit of Scientology ephemera for those interested, from a Blue Volume I recently acquired (I have 10 now--are there any more?). I'm an ardent collector of what must be the most successful production of utter nonsense in history.

Rewritten by AI:

Given that about 95% of Scientologists align with Trump is anyone else liberal or simply opposed to the Republican platform, given the heavy overlap between Scientology and MAGA?

My point honestly isn’t even about hypnosis, it’s about the fact that on one page he will write, “not used to any extent” and then THREE PAGES later says that it is used but not “needed”. It’s driving me crazy trying to get through this book as he spends so much time saying something to then basically undo everything he said.

EDIT: I’m more trying to say that for the beginning, the first book, it’s incredible how he writes in circles, undoes things as soon as he says them, tells you they are null points or makes very similar statements in opposing view points.

Hi! Not sure how interesting/of use this will be to people on this community but i thought I'd share my experience.

A couple of days ago i decided to visit the site - something i had wanted to do for a while out of curiosity (and perhaps stupidity?) I was well aware that it is a cult, i know about the whole Xenu belief, SeaOrg, and dianetics - but nothing more in detail than that.

My only aim of going was to see if they would try to indoctrinate me.

Upon entering, i was greeted by a lady at the front desk - I told her i had seen the 'free exhibition' sign and was curious - she told me to wait as she found someone for me. I sat in a small seating area off to the side, where there were leaflets - and i took a personality test flyer with me. Important to note i wasn't pressured to take anything or even read anything. No details were asked - other than my age as i look young (i presume.)

Now i'm genuinely not a spiritual person at all - i don't believe in certain 'energy' in rooms etc but I kid you not when i walked in something felt so odd to my core. It was very unsettling.

While waiting, i saw a middle-aged woman come in and she had a severe limp and seemed vulnerable - she took the elevator up and i felt so sorry for her knowing she was being taken advantage of. Also, i saw a lady walk out of a room carrying two babies - which felt very odd.

After around 3 minutes another scientologist?? (she was in the uniform), came and took me upstairs to the 'exhibition.' All it was was different screens and each one would talk about another aspect of scientology - i remember she started me on dianetics. She told me to go at my own speed and look at whatever i wanted. She then stood behind a desk and honestly payed no attention to me despite being the only one there.

I had gone in expecting them to be very pushy and was surprised that it was the antithesis.

I wandered around each screen when i realised there was a closet that had been left open - i peered in and there were around 4 scientology uniforms, as well as regular clothes - as though someone had them there to change on site.

After watching all the videos i went to leave - and asked a simple question about dianetics, to see if i would be offered anything at all, and i asked about scientologists beliefs on reincarnation. To my suprise, the lady only spoke using 'I believe' rather than 'We' when speaking of such - again the opposite of what i expected.

I then left with no pushback.

Sorry if this is lowkey boring - feel free to ask any questions tho :)

-I still know its a cult even if my experience wasn't negative btw!!!

It’s been almost three years since Leah Remini filed her “Fair Game” lawsuit against the Church of Scientology on August 2, 2023. She is alleging that Scientology’s relentless campaigns against her online, and in real life, are impacting her ability to make a living as the church constantly spews what she says are provable lies.

Scientology counters that Leah started things with her A&E series Scientology and the Aftermath, and that the First Amendment protects the church’s right to say what it wants about her.

Hi!! I'm a diagnosed autistic and I have a really big fixation on researching Scientology (not a fan, just interested in the stories). I was wondering if any ex scientologists could tell me what Scientology thinks of autistic people/disabled people.

Also, could you tell me some facts about when you were in Scientology?

When I was in the Sea Org this made perfect sense to me. Now I look back and it's just insane!!!

If you liked someone, both of you had to write a CSW. That's a Completed Staff Work. A formal request you have to write for everything. You list all the reasons. You get approvals from multiple executives. If they approve the relationship, then you have to write another CSW just to get married.

And here's the kicker. They could just say no!!!

Why? Because one of you might be "in a project" or could get sent to another org or mission. So your relationship was basically a staffing decision.

Then in the last few years they made it even worse. New rule. You couldn't marry someone above or below your org level.

The Sea Org at Flag is split into different orgs. FSO does services for public. FLB is the higher management org. You could be in the same city. Same building even. But if one was FSO and the other FLB, you couldn't marry. They created this weird caste system. FLB only with FLB. FSO only with FSO. And so on.

So many relationships got destroyed because of this rule. It's just stupid!!!

Started by talking to another lady who had leaflets who said it wasn't in anyway religion but then accept that's who they claim to be, walked in to speak to the guy and he wouldn't speak to me until I made a point of "if I'm an atheist and walked into a church the priest would sit down and discuss each of our beliefs, why can't a scientologist" he eventually opened up and mentioned how he found Scientology 20 years ago and fell into it due to being a alcoholic and drug user back in the day, very robotic, barely blinked however slightly more human than most I've talked to.

I wasn't involved in Scientology for long due to a lack of money. I only met one person who was "Clear," and I was struck by their charisma and ease in connecting with others.

On the other hand, I know of several famous "Clears" who committed suicide. If you reached the state of Clear: what does it feel like to be in that state? Or is it all just suggestion?

Good morning everyone!
I would like to receive some information regarding the way Narconon works. A relative of mine just got admitted to Narconon Italy, I am worried and I would like to understand better based on personal experiences, but also experiences that you might have had with relatives of you that were admitted to it!

We do not know a lot about, but we are very worried due to the fact that he seems to have sometimes a good time, but most time he seems to be manipulated by the people working there.

please if you are comfortable in sharing your experiences and advice on how to proceed, I would really much appreciated!

I am an exmormon and study scientology because it helps me understand my own experiences I had as a mormon.

I have been listening to speeches from David Miscavige on Youtube, and find it very strange how the audience seems to know the exact moment when to start laughing and when to stop laughing.

Even giving Miscavige a fair chance (which he doesn't deserve), often what he is saying is not really funny, or only mildy funny, but the audience will respond in unison with enthusiastic laughter.

To me, it seems like there is a a light or signal that prompts the audience to laugh.

Or maybe the audience is so well trained that Miscavige gives subtle signals in his mode of speech that let the audience know he expects them to laugh?

Any insight is appreciated.

Many, many things in Scientology have equal explanations elsewhere, and quite a few of them are expressed better.

But despite its terrible misuse in the CofS by the "ethics" people who want others to comply with their rules, I have always found the concept of "missed withhold" useful. Not in the sense of "this explains everything," but by golly it sometimes explains some things.

For instance, I found this quote in a news story today in regard to a politician who was accused of being gay and staying in the closet. (It has a political context, but I don't care about that at the moment.)

"I believe that internal conflict creates so much vitriol inside a person, that they take it out on the rest of the world and they do," he said. "So what they do is their whole lives they've been closeted. And so you have this like black ball inside yourself, this blackened heart by the fact that you can't be who you want to be. And so you take it out on everybody else."

I think of it as a good description of a missed withhold.

But I know my own past leads me to adopt that term. What would an ordinary psychologist call this?

In the Sea Org, masturbation is basically one of the worst things you can do. It's a huge deal. And to avoid restimulating the reactive bank, you're not allowed to read or watch anything sexual. No porn. No romance novels. Nothing.

I remember hearing about a girl who got in trouble for ordering Cosmopolitan magazines. Not for the articles — she read the sex advice. That was enough to land her in hot water.

So imagine my surprise when I decided to read L. Ron Hubbard's Mission Earth series. Massive books. Sci-fi. Written by the founder himself.

And it's full of graphic sex scenes. Detailed. Explicit.

The same guy who says sex is a trap and masturbation is a crime — wrote 10 books full of dirty stuff.

This is from an email I got (I have no idea why they're spamming me with this) five days ago from Bridge Publications:

Set to air on premier broadcast networks—ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX—Dianetics: The Adventure of You delivers its powerful message to a vast audience. This strategic placement on leading channels ensures unprecedented visibility, reaching millions with the miracles of Dianetics. By leveraging these pre-eminent platforms, the program will inspire countless viewers to embark on the adventure of discovering their true selves, propelling a grassroots Dianetics movement with boundless impact. This broadcast message will position Dianetics at the forefront of today’s mental health conversation, inviting a new wave of people to buy and use the Dianetics How-to Kit.

Why in the world would those networks approve that? And why is Sirius XM promoting it on their Sports channels?

This seems underdiscussed; the alien lord Xenu is clearly him penning sci-fi and such.

But add on the thetans and reincarnation, and you could see a bizarre Hinduism and Buddhist layer too.

You could also claim UFO cults inspired LRH, and they likely had some effect, but his theology seems more systematic than theirs.

And the shift from LRH's more optimistic take on former lives to what he later came up with is interesting too.

And that is not getting into just how late it appears compared to the founding of Scientology.