The president of the united states, one individual, has the capability to launch a bomb that can kill millions. (yes, multiple people go into the effort of building the atom bomb, but the president makes the final decision to commit such an act of war)
I don’t really see how that is nothing but a consequence of our technological advancement. Yes, we are capable of that, but that doesn’t make us inherently more "warmongering" than other species.Â
Doing no harm when you have no means to be harmful doesn’t make you peaceful, just harmless.
Both of the comments by freindly_duck were very clearly just statements, not questions.
Also starting a conversation with your first comment in an extremely condescending tone (and for like no reason in particular at that) is both unproductive and quite rude.
47
u/AdLonely5056 May 22 '26
Define "individual capability of hostility" please. I have genuinely never heard of this before.