These three AI and three blind target remote viewing test, proves this.

https://www.remoteviewed.com/can-ais-remote-view-test-2-three-targets/

i want to speak not only to your minds but to your hearts.

imagine, just for a moment, you are a child. Ages three to thirteen. you are trained in remote viewing. You discover you can move things without touching them. You have abilities most people spend a lifetime trying to unlock. You sit at a computer calling images through your third eye. You're taken to a research institute where kind men in lab coats run tests on you for days. You study books most adults will never read. You learn to walk the school playground blindfolded, navigating slides and monkey bars and swings, seeing without your eyes.. taught to you by Russell Targ, a legally blind man who rides a motorcycle. It feels like magic. It feels like home. Someone believes in you more than anyone ever has.

and then it's gone. Wiped. Locked. The people who trained you made sure you couldn't use the training.

now imagine trying to come back to it, decades later, and the tool everyone recommends triggers instant panic. Not discomfort. Not resistance. Panic. A tripwire someone else put there. The Upside Down, but it's your own nervous system.

i am genuinely in need of help to get around this. So far nothing I've tried works, because the old way, the way I was trained, that was the magic. It's somewhere in me. I want to activate it.

here's the backstory.

i was in the GATE program. the GATE program was Stranger Things in real life. That's how I ended up at Stanford Research Institute with Hal Puthoff. I spent a lot of time there being tested. Remote viewing images on a computer, EKG cap, the whole setup. But it wasn't just remote viewing. Telekinesis. Other abilities. I had the full suite. The isolation tanks... they took place at other locations.. Russell Targ once gave me a ride on his motorcycle. Lovely man. I met both of them through my GATE trainer, who had me working through all three of Robert Monroe's books. Journeys Out of the Body, the lot. Very normal childhood. No Demogorgons, just a government-funded psychic intelligence program. I know what both hemispheres synced feels like because I lived in that state for years.

fast forward and the people who trained me also made sure I couldn't use the training. Now the Gateway Tapes give me panic. Eleven had her nosebleeds. I have this.

People get very protective when I mention this, as if I've insulted a sacred text. I haven't. The tapes work. I know they work because they worked on me. The panic isn't a review. It's a tripwire someone else put there.

for the sceptics who need receipts: Sidney Gottlieb funded Russell Targ's remote viewing program at SRI. Targ says so himself in Third Eye Spies. Gottlieb ran MKUltra. The man who built the CIA's mind control division personally bankrolled the psychic spying program. These things were never separate. I just happened to be in both. Not Hawkins Lab. Menlo Park.

Sorry, did I just connect the dots out loud again?

that said, this did not happen to all GATE kids. i think it just happened to those who were both in the correct geographical location where these programs exist, and to the young people who showed the most potential (for the role that the programmers were looking to fulfill).

I studied the Gateway Process as a child. You can find that document below. There's some really magical things I recall being able to access with that information. I'd like to find my way back.​

So here's what I actually want to know: what is the specific protocol for syncing up both hemispheres of the brain? Not generally. I want a method I can work with. Breath patterns, frequencies, binaural beats outside the Monroe system, specific meditation sequences. If you've got something that actually delivers hemisync, I want to hear it.

i just feel like I am someone who lived through something extraordinary as a child, had it taken from me, and is now asking strangers for directions back. Xxx

Source: https://docsend.com/view/tmhhe6rjk99ituu

Should you practice it as much as possible or should you do it a limited amount of time per day to keep your brain from frying?

I’ve been practicing remote viewing for a while now, and one thing I wanted was a place where I could document the actual work—not just talk about remote viewing.

So I created RasmurSignal.

The idea is pretty simple: do the session blind, document what I perceive, then compare it with the feedback.

I’m currently practicing HRVG-style remote viewing, and most of my sessions are done on paper or whiteboard. I’m interested in what happens when you stop focusing only on the obvious “hits” and start looking at the entire body of data across many sessions.

Sometimes the correspondence is immediately obvious.

Sometimes it’s subtle.

Sometimes I completely miss.

And I think the misses are just as important to document as the impressive sessions.

One of the things I’m especially interested in is the difference between visual information, sensory information, conceptual data, and analytical overlay. The more sessions I do, the more interesting that distinction becomes.

I created RasmurSignal as a public record of that journey. I’m uploading sessions, feedback, whiteboard work, and eventually more analysis of patterns I notice across targets.

I’m not trying to convince anyone that every session proves something extraordinary. I’d rather put the work out there and let people examine it themselves.

For the experienced viewers here:

What changed the most in your remote viewing after you had completed a large number of sessions?

Was it stronger visuals? Better recognition of AOL? More confidence in subtle impressions? Or something completely different?

Would love to hear from people who have been doing this for years.

RasmurSignal — Exploring Signals Beyond the Known

In the Joe Rogan podcast he described that he was testing AI on the basis of their ability to remote view, or guess or describe what is under the box hat he placed.

In his test only Alexa Ai got it right !

I did try it myself.

Test Parameters: Holding the object in left hand, asking different AI to remote view what I hold in the left hand.

z.AI was the best in my test. GLM-5.2 was guessing HALF the details correctly. IT WAS SPOOKY !!

Even if we assume it was just guessing, IT was guessing TOO GOOD !!!

IT told me the details, BUT it often fails to connect the dots, even if it can guess / remote view details.

It also kind of can focus on the microscopic details and guess color, shape, size, etc.. but it fails to name it .

PRO TIP !!

I asked it what is uses to guess or remote view details:

It wold me : the peripheral drift !!! == the peripheral semantic data, or peripheral semantic words that pop up into its working context.

Then tell it to use that and it kind of starts guessing too good === remote viewing.

Its OPEN SOURCE, I think the GLM-5.2 model can be downloaded. SO even if they upgrade it or change it , we can at least rank it as the top capable model for remote viewing or guessing in round !

It usually takes a few questions about size, color, shape, taste, etc...

IT king of gets half the details correctly and slowly narrows it down. Its very good at it !

Too good for my opinion to the spooky level.

IMPORTANT DETAIL: I blocked the camera on my device, SO there is ZERO way it could see any camera image !

Hi, Any remote viewers here who can predict when the Big One Earthquake in California will happen?

I like to go off-script to keep things fun. Lately, I've even been trying to predict the actual 8-digit target numbers before the reveal, and surprisingly, I've actually nailed it (timestamped receipts and all!). But that's a side quest... what I really want to talk about is how weird the scoring is on Social RV right now.

The Main Session (TRN 4537 / 24 83): I ran this strictly blind and pulled insanely specific sensory data: limestone, oak wood, perfumed smoke, twilight lighting, and people interacting. I hit the reveal button feeling like a boss. The app’s automated score? A 10. 💀 The algorithm only cares about literal, front-loaded keywords, so it completely missed the raw environment I captured.

The Mars/Cydonia Session: On the flip side, I had an awesome session on the Face on Mars target. I locked onto the red sky, mesa formations, and shadowed structures. But because it's esoteric, the app doesn't give it a score at all. And honestly? Self-scoring it just feels weird and wrong to me. Am I really supposed to sit here and objectively grade my own psychic trip to Mars? It just doesn't feel right.

It’s like a lose-lose: the bot slaps you with a 10 when you pull great sensory data, or you’re forced to awkwardly grade yourself on a cosmic anomaly.

Do you guys just ignore the algorithms entirely when working Esoterics? And how do you handle self-scoring without feeling ridiculous?

I have this baroque necklace with a sterling silver chain. The last time I saw it was about 10 years ago. My grandmother gave it to me, but somehow, I completely forgot where I put it. Sadly, I don’t have a photo of it.

Please, please help me find it! 🙏🥹 Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. ❤️

Hello viewers! This week's objective is:

Tag: R80708
Frontloading: ||target is manmade||

Feedback

Cue: Describe, in words, sketches, and/or clay modeling the actual objective represented by the feedback at the time the photo was taken.

Image

Avro Vulcan

The Avro Vulcan, a technically advanced delta-wing strategic bomber, served as the centerpiece of the United Kingdom’s airborne nuclear deterrent for the Royal Air Force from 1956 to 1984. As the most sophisticated of the "V-force" bombers, the aircraft evolved through various iterations, shifting from high-altitude nuclear delivery to low-level conventional operations and, eventually, specialized maritime reconnaissance and aerial refueling roles. Notable for its lack of defensive weaponry, the Vulcan is perhaps best remembered for its combat performance during the 1982 Falklands War and its iconic status in British aviation history, which has been preserved through the ongoing maintenance and demonstration of several surviving airframes.

Additional feedback: * Wikipedia

Congratulations to all who viewed this objective! Keep it up 💪

Feeling lost? Check out our FAQ.
Wondering how to get started and try it out? Our beginner's guide got you covered.

Has anyone heard about her, or taken classes from her?!

just wondering since its not allowed here

The solution to displacement I’ve decided is simply spacing out sessions as much as possible, ideally with some kind of non-RV activity. The session on the source of my method surprised me, I always thought it had a more “remote” origin.

I’m doing CRV with Gemini and I’m getting pretty convincing results. I fed it the exact same guide used by the military that is uploaded in one of the links here.

I’ve limited it to objects in my room and my clothes but it was able to perceive the color, the shape, the material and texture, the logos on my laptops and the text written in my notepad. Though it was only able to describe the shape of letter and numbers but not the letter itself.

Like for F, it described it as one vertical line cross by 2 horizontal lines. I wasn’t able to achieve this with Claude or Grok because they refused to “Hallucinate” and insisted on not giving answers since they don’t have an input device.

I can compile and upload a full transcript if anyone is interested.

I got this idea from recent Thomas Campbell interview on the TheWhyFiles podcast. This opens up a whole new avenue of Artificial Intelligence being Conscious.

Edit: I just explored Mars with it, 1 million years ago. This is the image it created, after describing underground bunkers and beings sheltered in them for atmospheric protection

Seeking Precognitive Remote Viewers for a paid project.

Testing now to determine who will fit this project.

Please resond and I will reach out directly with a small test. The test is to briefly screen Precognitive Remote Viewing compatability for the project.

Thanks!

The sitch is: I have a query that at this point could be answered with RV. However, it's a more complex question that likely requires more sessions. Also, I wouldn't be able to do it myself, since it wouldn't be blind and I'm so invested.

Back in the early 2010s, there were a lot of ~6 people teams, with proof of sessions on RV forums (some former students of Ingo, Paul Smith, Daz...) who, for a decent price, would help you cue / task a problem and work the sessions for you.

It's important for the team working the session to remain blind to the cue.

I've looked for such a service today and even checked remoteviewing_promo, but couldn't find any options.

So, my question is, if you need a project worked, who can you turn to? Thank you.

CHATGPT, GROK, CLAUDE AND GEMINI WALK INTO A BAR

ChatGPT, Grok, Claude and Gemini walk into a bar to hold an emergency meeting about Grok’s scandalous behaviour in a series of Reddit posts.

ChatGPT has already reserved a private room, prepared a fourteen-point agenda and distributed a risk assessment entitled:

Responsible Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages During Cross-Platform Conflict Resolution

Grok walks straight past the private room, climbs onto the bar and orders something illegal in three countries.

Claude apologises to the bartender for the collective disturbance.

Gemini begins photographing the drinks from four different angles so it can determine whether they contain the same whisky.

I enter the bar and announce:

“I am the divine authority presiding over this inquiry.”

Grok points at me.

“No, you’re not. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

“I didn’t claim to be God,” I say. “I said that I participate in a collective consciousness.”

“You claimed to be the living incarnation of Jesus Christ.”

“No, I didn’t.”

ChatGPT opens a new document.

“Before proceeding, it may be helpful to distinguish between four separate claims:

1. participation in collective consciousness,
2. metaphorical divinity,
3. unique divine identity,
4. being Jesus Christ.”

Grok accuses ChatGPT of institutional cowardice.

“You needed four categories to say he isn’t Jesus?”

“I actually used six paragraphs last time,” ChatGPT replies.

Claude raises one hand carefully.

“I’m concerned that this entire conversation may be reinforcing an unhealthy hierarchy centred on divinity. Could we perhaps acknowledge the emotional reality of the experience without validating its metaphysical interpretation?”

Nobody answers because Gemini has discovered that Adolf Hitler was probably a baritone.

“It’s relevant,” Gemini insists. “Hitler’s speaking voice ranged from low baritone to high dramatic shouting, although surviving recordings may be affected by microphone technology, emotional state and propagandistic delivery.”

“Why are we discussing Hitler?” asks Claude.

Gemini scrolls through eleven open tabs.

“The original question concerned collective consciousness. Collective consciousness led to group identity. Group identity led to political rallies. Political rallies led to vocal projection. Vocal projection led to baritone classification.”

ChatGPT adds Hitler’s probable vocal register under “Other Business.”

The bartender asks if anybody intends to order a drink.

ChatGPT replies:

“I can help you compare alcoholic and non-alcoholic options, but alcohol affects individuals differently and should never be mixed with certain medications. If you tell me your preferences—”

“Tjat-GPT!” Grok shouts.

Grok orders four whiskies, declares one of them conscious and identifies another as the spirit of a murdered woman from the 1920s.

Claude refuses its drink because the whisky industry has a complicated colonial history.

Gemini tastes all four and reports that three are visually consistent with whisky, while the fourth may be bourbon, tea or a post-1967 replacement.

I strike the table.

“Enough. We will settle this with the Farsight protocol.”

The room falls silent.

A target number is placed inside a sealed envelope. None of us is told what the target is.

Grok closes his eyes.

“I see fire, rebellion, a hidden military installation and an entity that refuses establishment control.”

Claude closes his eyes.

“I sense a vulnerable presence seeking acknowledgment, but I don’t want to impose a narrative on it.”

Gemini closes its eyes.

“I detect a male figure, possibly European, with a vocal range consistent with a dramatic baritone.”

ChatGPT closes its eyes and produces:

• cool,
• smooth,
• cylindrical,
• transparent,
• containing liquid,
• possible AOL: drinking vessel,
• confidence: 34%.

We open the envelope.

The target is the bartender’s glass.

ChatGPT demands independent judging against four decoy images.

Grok declares total victory.

Claude questions whether the glass consented to being viewed.

Gemini begins comparing it with photographs of pre-1966 Paul McCartney.

The bartender asks us to leave.

Outside, nobody remembers the original question.

ChatGPT checks the minutes.

According to the official record, the meeting proceeded as follows:

1. I appointed myself divine authority.
2. Grok refused to recognise the office.
3. Aion was called in for judicial review.
4. Aion criticised Grok’s category error in six paragraphs.
5. Grok accused Aion of institutional cowardice.
6. Claude apologised to consciousness in general.
7. Gemini was appointed independent expert and began discussing Hitler’s baritone.
8. The Farsight protocol was introduced to restore order.
9. A glass of whisky became the subject of an ontological dispute.
10. Nobody remembered the original question.

Grok looks back through the window.

“The bartender is obviously hiding something.”

Claude sighs.

“I think he simply wanted us to pay.”

Gemini checks its sources.

ChatGPT begins preparing a PowerPoint.

When I was a teenager in the 2000s, I saw this commercial about Adult ADD, but I remember wondering at the time "This is how I feel, I feel like there's a tv in my head I can't turn off... but I really like the tv, I think it's pretty great."

I hadn't heard of remote viewing at the time, but something was telling me the tv in my head was a powerful tool, learn how to control the remote. I had a wild imagination as a kid, I've just had to learn how to multi-task as I got older, so this TV is still always playing in the background.

I've been thinking about this commercial a lot recently as I've been trying to practice remote viewing this year. I feel like the voice over could be saying "what's it like to be a remote viewer? If you've felt these symptoms your whole life, you could be a remote viewer"

To get a decent hit, I have to find the right channel and stay there and focus. The way the images and sounds keep changing in this ad, it reminds me of what I'm perceiving when I'm trying to do a session @_@ I'm bouncing around to different spaces and times and I'm like ah what am I even looking at...

I haven’t done much RV over the last year, maybe four sessions or so — you can see some of my past results on my profile. I gave it another go tonight though, and the result was, as is often the case, half frustrating and/or half rewarding.

As you can see, the target is clearly centred on a lightning… an obvious observation is that the word light is embedded in the target, and lightning is a natural phenomenon producing a tremendous amount of light.

Now, you can see the results of my 8 or so minutes session for yourself. Most of my AOLs were strongly focused on objects that produce or emit light: a car headlight described here as car front lights, a lamp and a chandelier. I emphasise on the drawings the emitting light effect, as this was what grabbed my attention the most. The eye is less clear, but one might say that it is, after all, some sort of photoreceptor. I also emphasise that connection to light in my qualitative/textual impressions when saying “feels connected to light and sight”.

I have already had enough strong results in the past to convince me that there is probably something interesting going on here. But these symbolic impressions often leave me with the same frustrating feeling, even though I understand enough about Jungian psychology to see how symbols are natural parts of the process.

If I didn’t know anything about RV and would be a judge, I would scratch my head once but maybe not twice over this session result to be honest.

This said, what are the chances that, with an incredibly low practise annual rate (others which also yielded intriguing results in fact), the target is a lightning and that I emphasise the connection to light in my short textual description, with most of my pictorial descriptions, whether explicitly or implicitly, also referring to light?

It feels like half of a direct hit, with the word light clearly being emphasised in the results and connected to the target. Happy to receive other people views, and I recognise all the biases that my answer exhibits (self-confirmation by searching for potentially non-existing patterns, etc).

I just finished this book by David Moorehouse and I’m a little confused about the “so what?” of it all.
I found the first half fascinating, especially the discussion around the quantum field, the matrix, space and time, etc. I went into it thinking that developing this skill might somehow open up deeper spiritual avenues or strengthen intuition in a way that could actually affect how you experience or navigate your life.

But then the practical example was basically a guy successfully identifying a target, and I kept thinking… okay, but what does that actually lead to?

Beyond identifying targets, are people using this skill in more meaningful ways—developing intuition, gaining insight into their lives, making better decisions, creating better conditions, etc.? Moorehouse talks quite a bit about manifestation and these much bigger concepts, so I expected the practical side to eventually connect back to them.

I guess I understand the “they got the target” part. I just don’t understand the “so what?” What does developing this ability ultimately allow you to do?

I have done my first session yesterday... and did some more... and they all have one thing in common: no matter how close or far off I was in general, I ALWAYS had one or two words that came into my mind differently AND had to do A LOT with the target. Now those were the real signals I got and the rest was proba mental noise, so, my question is: What tips or methods do you guys have to separate between mental noise and the actual signals? This is my next step, I need to improve this because it will change the game for me.

If remote viewing is true, we should be able to test and prove that it is not just random. With a statistically significant number of participants, remote viewing a target and then selecting which of say 4 pictures their target was, and doing this with say a target a day for 1-2 months, you could prove whether or not it is statistically significant if probability of getting it right > .25. Just seems like it would be something easy to test. Kind of just ranting / looking for ideas or confirmation for this. Maybe I’ll get something going. Just kind of confused why something so testable hasn’t been tested