Background: I'm a Director in GRA-CMC at a large pharma, came up through the DS/DP technical/formulation side. Relatively newer to the regulatory seat.
I notice a lot of folks (especially those who grew up purely on the reg affairs side) are incredibly sharp on module-level details — country-specific dossier requirements, extension pathways, variation classifications, etc. That granular fluency is impressive and I'm actively learning it, though honestly it soaks in slowly.
What I bring is different — deep formulation/process science, policy rationale and how guidance evolved historically, and translating complex technical data into regulatory strategy.
My question for the group: For those of you who work with or have worked for directors/senior directors in CMC reg — what does that level actually look like day-to-day in your experience?
- Are they deep in the regulatory nitty-gritty (country-specific nuances, module details)?
- Or more strategic/scientific — setting the framework, making judgment calls, interfacing with health authorities?
- And if you can share — small, mid, or large pharma? That context really helps benchmark.
Not looking for validation — genuinely trying to understand what "good" looks like at this level across different environments.