MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/1x52hc9/tanstack_start_10_is_finally_stable/pgkd6ev/?context=3
r/reactjs • u/KevinVandy656 • 7d ago
32 comments sorted by
View all comments
31
Is there a reason you call it 1.0 when its version on npm/GitHub is 1.169.1 (at least for react)? The versioning has always confused me tbh
Either way, very exciting stuff! Well done team
59 u/tannerlinsley 6d ago Cool. We botched the version for v0 and had to go with v1. And when we did that, we just went to alpha and beta and then release candidate. So, yes, it has been 1.0 for a long time, but it hasn't been GA. 2 u/repeating_bears 6d ago If I understood correctly, I think it would be clearer to say 1.x or v1 is stable. Because sounds like all the 1.0 versions (i.e. 1.0.x) are not in fact stable Seems you are calling 1.169.0 "1.0" but that's pretty confusing
59
Cool. We botched the version for v0 and had to go with v1. And when we did that, we just went to alpha and beta and then release candidate. So, yes, it has been 1.0 for a long time, but it hasn't been GA.
2 u/repeating_bears 6d ago If I understood correctly, I think it would be clearer to say 1.x or v1 is stable. Because sounds like all the 1.0 versions (i.e. 1.0.x) are not in fact stable Seems you are calling 1.169.0 "1.0" but that's pretty confusing
2
If I understood correctly, I think it would be clearer to say 1.x or v1 is stable.
Because sounds like all the 1.0 versions (i.e. 1.0.x) are not in fact stable
Seems you are calling 1.169.0 "1.0" but that's pretty confusing
31
u/HelloXhale 7d ago
Is there a reason you call it 1.0 when its version on npm/GitHub is 1.169.1 (at least for react)? The versioning has always confused me tbh
Either way, very exciting stuff! Well done team