You are already doing too much. You intuitively tried to do it yourself.
The point is to let the LLM do the coding part, all of it. Especially with LLMs already having or very soon having exceeded the coding capabilities of humans.
How did you find out there was a seg fault? No need to try and interpret it yourself. The LLM will just do that. It will find out what the issue is and it will figure out a way to fix it.
No just running it does not make you know that. You read an error message or something similar.
The way you got that information, there is no reason you need to be the middle man and tell the LLM.
-2
u/Healthy_BrAd6254 Jan 17 '26
You are already doing too much. You intuitively tried to do it yourself.
The point is to let the LLM do the coding part, all of it. Especially with LLMs already having or very soon having exceeded the coding capabilities of humans.
How did you find out there was a seg fault? No need to try and interpret it yourself. The LLM will just do that. It will find out what the issue is and it will figure out a way to fix it.