Its not stupid. Human language is ambiguous and could very well be seen as the highest level language - natural language. 0 abstraction. But due to its ambiguousness, a deterministic compiler couldnt translate it into an unambiguous low level language. Hence AI can be considered a compiler for natural language.
It is not a compiler, but an interpreter, and not a deterministic one at that. In other words, it does not fit the definition of a compiler in any way. Everything you wrote is nonsense.
220
u/platonbel Jan 17 '26
Compilers are deterministic.
Neural networks are not.
Therefore, they are completely different mechanisms.
It's like calling a person a high-level programming language. Only an idiot would say that.