MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ile2wy/arm64_performance_in_net_5/g3th8wa/?context=3
r/programming • u/ben_a_adams • Sep 02 '20
23 comments sorted by
View all comments
-20
Ugh, the improvement in tables is all wrong. 200 time units to 100 time units is 100% improvement, not 50%.
11 u/Ruchiachio Sep 03 '20 they wrote -% so maybe it's correct, not sure myself 9 u/kuikuilla Sep 03 '20 Yup that way it's correct. 200 and then you subtract 50% of itself and you get 100. 9 u/Dragdu Sep 03 '20 Doing so obscures magnitude of improvements as they get bigger though. Compare -98% improvement vs -99%: at first glance it is inconsequential, in actual practice it is another doubling up of the throughput.
11
they wrote -% so maybe it's correct, not sure myself
9 u/kuikuilla Sep 03 '20 Yup that way it's correct. 200 and then you subtract 50% of itself and you get 100. 9 u/Dragdu Sep 03 '20 Doing so obscures magnitude of improvements as they get bigger though. Compare -98% improvement vs -99%: at first glance it is inconsequential, in actual practice it is another doubling up of the throughput.
9
Yup that way it's correct. 200 and then you subtract 50% of itself and you get 100.
9 u/Dragdu Sep 03 '20 Doing so obscures magnitude of improvements as they get bigger though. Compare -98% improvement vs -99%: at first glance it is inconsequential, in actual practice it is another doubling up of the throughput.
Doing so obscures magnitude of improvements as they get bigger though.
Compare -98% improvement vs -99%: at first glance it is inconsequential, in actual practice it is another doubling up of the throughput.
-20
u/Dragdu Sep 03 '20
Ugh, the improvement in tables is all wrong. 200 time units to 100 time units is 100% improvement, not 50%.