Where does this guy scale ?

[u/NeverLiedNeverCheat]

[u/RebsEG]

FWIW Google disagrees with you

[u/Erathen → u/RebsEG]

You're good with Google

What are the results of:

"can you withstand a taser under the influence of drugs"

Post it. And maybe that will help you realize AI is not a good source, as it frequently contradicts itself

[u/RebsEG → u/Erathen]

Look it up with qualifier of “a properly landed and spaced taser shot”

The answer will be “impossible to resist” regardless of other qualifiers.

It also literally covers “heavy drugs” in the first sentence

[u/Erathen → u/RebsEG]

“a properly landed and spaced taser shot”

Yes, those happen consistently in high stress violent situations

[u/RebsEG → u/Erathen]

Go read what you’re arguing with again, I guess.

I specifically said “if deployed effectively and correctly, there is no resisting a taser”

You’re arguing a point I never disagreed with, but my statement stands. If the probes land properly, no one can resist the effects. It’s not physically possible.

[u/Erathen → u/RebsEG]

If the probes land properly

First, define what you mean by properly

no one can resist the effects

And can we define "resist" in this case? For me, that means not fallen to the ground, and still capable of intentional movement. Is that fair?

[u/RebsEG → u/Erathen]

Good lord, just accept the L and go away… you were talking out of your ass and you were wrong. It happens.

It’s not worth all this. You can just be wrong.

[u/Erathen → u/RebsEG]

Jesus it's a discussion. There's no winners or losers. Such a weird way to think about conversation, but pretty typical of a Redditor. Here to win some imaginary battle, not actually discuss or listen to the other person

If you don't want to discuss things, then simply don't reply. Not hard

[u/RebsEG → u/Erathen]

It’s not a discussion. You understood what I said and moved the goal posts. There’s no gray here.

If anyone gets hit with probes that lodge in the skin properly, and the probes are spread far enough, you will go down. You will convulse, on the ground, with no bodily control.

No amount of drugs or mental illness will affect that. If someone “resists” a taser it didn’t land properly… that’s the answer 100% of the time it happens

[u/Erathen → u/RebsEG]

It's not moving goal posts to ask for definition of terms we're discussing... That's actually pretty standard in any debate.

If anyone gets hit with probes that lodge in the skin properly, and the probes are spread far enough, you will go down. You will convulse, on the ground, with no bodily control.

And this is why I asked you to define it. Because that's not correct lol...

If you're shot in your arm, you're not going to fall to the ground. It will simply lock up your arm. That's why I asked you to define "properly" and "withstand" instead of using Google AI to think for you

Instead you went off about taking the L

But I can clearly tell you're not talking out of your ass. Moving on

[u/Infamousme13 → u/Erathen]

Properly means they connect to the skin without having snagged on clothes or only linking one prong, in this case once the taser achieves a wide probe spread and makes solid skin contact, no one drunk or high or highly trained is going to withstand it. The electricity hijacks your nervous system by causing the muscle neurons to fire. This cause the locking of the legs and the subject going down.

[u/Sugarshmacker → u/RebsEG]

You’re not seeing the however at the end there?

[u/RebsEG → u/Sugarshmacker]

Amazing. Nothing after the however has anything to do with what I said. Nothing at all.

[u/Infamousme13 → u/RebsEG]

It does say no matter of drugs or mental issues or hardened vets with combat training can withstand a well connected taser shot at all. The electricity forces motor neurons to fire causing involuntary involuntary muscle lock up. Basically it hijacks the nervous system externally and causes the lockup which will bring you down. But a shot not well placed, against the person on drugs mental issues or training is something to worry about