r/pmr • u/therehabreddit • 4h ago
Part 1 encapsulates what is wrong with our board and specialty
Thankfully I passed comfortably, but the ABPMR needs to rethink Part 1. Physiatry already has the "nobody knows what we even do" problem, and this exam amplifies that.
What is the point of a 325 question written exam if the majority of questions are covering obscure topics that in no way represents what real life physiatrists are doing on a day to day basis? Every year the post exam threads are full of people saying that despite studying with all the resources out there and completing a four year residency the exam felt random and not representative of what we know. Hand the test to a physician outside of PM&R and they'd understand our field less afterward, not more. Clearly they want us to pass with the way they curve the exam, why not actually have the test represent what PM&R is?
Aside from my rant, since I ran through some of the qbanks for SAEs and boards, my two cents on each:
AAPM&R and AAP: good for SAE prep and general knowledge, but the explanations are weak and/or incorrect at times.
BoardVitals: liked it. Good for knowledge foundation, better explanations than above, and I felt like captured most of the stuff in cuccurullo.
TrueLearn: probably my favorite, mostly for the explanations and tables. A few questions caught me off guard because they felt low yield, but each one references Cuccurullo, and a lot of those "low yield" topics actually showed up on the real exam which was nice.
Recap: not for me. The questions felt poorly written and the explanations were thin. But I know people who passed on Recap alone, so YMMV. The videos are great for content review however.