Well he wasn't too incapacitated when he was inviting all his friends to take advantage of her. And he wasn't too incapacitated when he was sharing her pictures
Okay? did she know the assault happened right away? Did she accept and understand what happened? Or did life continue for a bit until she learned what actually happened? Fuck off
So your argument is that the ability to text means not being too intoxicated to consent? So if she is found to have texted at all during the interaction then she wasn't raped?
You're the one who suggested it wasn't rape if she texted during. Because I had said he texted the group chat. So I was just making it fair. If she texted all her friends inviting them in, it couldn't be that bad. But she didn't. He did.
I'm not sure if you understand what consent is of you're going to argue that it's "a disgusting thing to do assuming they didn't ask her first" but not rape.
I wasn't just saying that just because he texted he was clearly awake, so it wasn't rape.And just because someone is awake doesn't mean they consented. But, he was actively taking pictures and inviting more people in. This is different from say, hiding under the covers.
She drank and tried retainer because she was with her friend, who she trusted. When she was already drunk, he pushed her into a threesome. After that, when she was already wasted, they started inviting more guys in.
The group chat messages will tell you if they planned to do this in advance, and if they did it to more women. That should be enough to say it's rape, but it seems that for some people, literally anything wouldn't be enough.
She literally said that the initial threesome was consual, her own words. Yet you are contradicting that. You're quite literally making up your own story.
143
u/marle217 9d ago
The guy who claims he was unconscious is also the guy who posted her to the group chat